▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ⟶
One of the most embarrassing aspects of U.S. politics is politicians who deny that money has any impact on what they do. For instance, Tom Corbett, Pennsylvania’s notoriously fracking-friendly former governor, got $1.7 million from oil and gas companies but assured voters that “The contributions don’t affect my decisions.” If you’re trying to get people to vote for you, you can’t tell them that what they want doesn’t matter.
This pose is also popular with a certain prominent breed of pundits, who love to tell us “Don’t Follow the Money” (New York Times columnist David Brooks), or “Money does not buy elections” (Freakonomics co-author Stephen Dubner on public radio’s Marketplace), or “Money won’t buy you votes” (Yale Law School professor Peter H. Schuck in the Los Angeles Times).
Meanwhile, 85 percent of Americans say we need to either “completely rebuild” or make “fundamental changes” to the campaign finance system. Just 13 percent think “only minor changes are necessary,” less than the 18 percent of Americans who believe they’ve been in the presence of a ghost.
So we’ve decided that it would be useful to collect examples of actual politicians acknowledging the glaringly obvious reality. Here’s a start; I’m sure there must be many others, so if you have suggestions, please leave them in the comments or email me. I’d also love to speak directly to current or former politicians who have an opinion about it.
• “I gave to many people, before this, before two months ago, I was a businessman. I give to everybody. When they call, I give. And do you know what? When I need something from them two years later, three years later, I call them, they are there for me. And that’s a broken system.” — Donald Trump in 2015.
• “[T]his is what’s wrong. [Donald Trump] buys and sells politicians of all stripes … he’s used to buying politicians.” — Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., in 2015.
“Now [the United States is] just an oligarchy, with unlimited political bribery being the essence of getting the nominations for president or to elect the president. And the same thing applies to governors and U.S. senators and congressmembers. … So now we’ve just seen a complete subversion of our political system as a payoff to major contributors …” — Jimmy Carter, former president, in 2015. (Thanks to Sam Sacks.)
• “[T]he millionaire class and the billionaire class increasingly own the political process, and they own the politicians that go to them for money. … we are moving very, very quickly from a democratic society, one person, one vote, to an oligarchic form of society, where billionaires would be determining who the elected officials of this country are.” — Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., in 2015. (Thanks to Robert Wilson in comments below.) Sanders has also said many similar things, such as “I think many people have the mistaken impression that Congress regulates Wall Street. … The real truth is that Wall Street regulates the Congress.” (Thanks to ND, via email.)
• “You have to go where the money is. Now where the money is, there’s almost always implicitly some string attached. … It’s awful hard to take a whole lot of money from a group you know has a particular position then you conclude they’re wrong [and] vote no.” — Vice President Joe Biden in 2015.
• “[T]oday’s whole political game, run by an absurdist’s nightmare of moneyed elites, is ridiculous – a game in which corporations are people and money is magically empowered to speak; candidates trek to the corporate suites and secret retreats of the rich, shamelessly selling their political souls.” – Jim Hightower, former Democratic agricultural commissioner of Texas, 2015. (Thanks to CS, via email.)
• “People tell me all the time that our politics in Washington are broken and that multimillionaires, billionaires and big corporations are calling all the shots … it’s hard not to agree.” — Russ Feingold, three-term Democratic senator from Wisconsin, in 2015 announcing he’s running for the Senate again. (Thanks to CS, via email.)
• “Lobbyists and career politicians today make up what I call the Washington Cartel. … [They] on a daily basis are conspiring against the American people. … [C]areer politicians’ ears and wallets are open to the highest bidder.” — Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, in 2015.• “I can legally accept gifts from lobbyists unlimited in number and in value … As you might guess, what results is a corruption of the institution of Missouri government, a corruption driven by big money in politics.” — Missouri State Sen. Rob Schaaf, 2015. (Thanks to DK, via email.)
• “When you start to connect the actual access to money, and the access involves law enforcement officials, you have clearly crossed a line. What is going on is shocking, terrible.” – James E. Tierney, former attorney general of Maine, in 2014.
• “Allowing people and corporate interest groups and others to spend an unlimited amount of unidentified money has enabled certain individuals to swing any and all elections, whether they are congressional, federal, local, state … Unfortunately and rarely are these people having goals which are in line with those of the general public. History well shows that there is a very selfish game that’s going on and that our government has largely been put up for sale.” – John Dingell, 29-term Democratic congressman from Michigan, in 2014 just before he retired.
• “When some think tank comes up with the legislation and tells you not to fool with it, why are you even a legislator anymore? You just sit there and take votes and you’re kind of a feudal serf for folks with a lot of money.” — Dale Schultz, 32-year Republican state legislator in Wisconsin and former state Senate Majority Leader, in 2013 before retiring rather than face a primary challenger backed by Americans for Prosperity. Several months later Schultz said: “I firmly believe that we are beginning in this country to look like a Russian-style oligarchy where a couple of dozen billionaires have basically bought the government.”
• “I was directly told, ‘You want to be chairman of House Administration, you want to continue to be chairman.’ They would actually put in writing that you have to raise $150,000. They still do that — Democrats and Republicans. If you want to be on this committee, it can cost you $50,000 or $100,000 — you have to raise that money in most cases.” — Bob Ney, five-term Republican congressman from Ohio and former chairman of the House Administration Committee who pleaded guilty to corruption charges connected to the Jack Abramoff scandal, in 2013. (Thanks to ratpatrol in comments below.)
• “The alliance of money and the interests that it represents, the access that it affords to those who have it at the expense of those who don’t, the agenda that it changes or sets by virtue of its power is steadily silencing the voice of the vast majority of Americans … The truth requires that we call the corrosion of money in politics what it is – it is a form of corruption and it muzzles more Americans than it empowers, and it is an imbalance that the world has taught us can only sow the seeds of unrest.” – Secretary of State John Kerry, in 2013 farewell speech to the Senate.
• “American democracy has been hacked. … The United States Congress … is now incapable of passing laws without permission from the corporate lobbies and other special interests that control their campaign finances.” — Al Gore, former vice president, in his 2013 book The Future. (Thanks to anon in comments below.)
• “I think it is because of the corrupt paradigm that has become Washington, D.C., whereby votes continually are bought rather than representatives voting the will of their constituents. … That’s the voice that’s been missing at the table in Washington, D.C. — the people’s voice has been missing.” — Michele Bachmann, four-term Republican congresswoman from Minnesota and founder of the House Tea Party Caucus, in 2011.
• “I will begin by stating the sadly obvious: Our electoral system is a mess. Powerful financial interests, free to throw money about with little transparency, have corrupted the basic principles underlying our representative democracy.” — Chris Dodd, five-term Democratic senator from Connecticut, in 2010 farewell speech to the Senate. (Thanks to RO, via email.)
• “The banks — hard to believe in a time when we’re facing a banking crisis that many of the banks created — are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill. And they frankly own the place.” – Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., in 2009.• “Across the spectrum, money changed votes. Money certainly drove policy at the White House during the Clinton administration, and I’m sure it has in every other administration too.” — Joe Scarborough, four-term Republican congressman from Florida and now co-host of “Morning Joe,” in the 1990s. (Thanks to rrheard in comments below.)
• “We are the only people in the world required by law to take large amounts of money from strangers and then act as if it has no effect on our behavior.” — Barney Frank, 16-term Democratic congressman from Massachusetts, in the 1990s. (Thanks to RO, via email.)
“… money plays a much more important role in what is done in Washington than we believe. … [Y]ou’ve got to cozy up, as an incumbent, to all the special interest groups who can go out and raise money for you from their members, and that kind of a relationship has an influence on the way you’re gonna vote. … I think we have to become much more vigilant on seeing the impact of money … I think it’s wrong and we’ve got to change it.” — Mitt Romney, then the Republican candidate running against Ted Kennedy for Senate, in 1994. (Thanks to LA, via email.)
• “There is no question in the world that money has control.” — Barry Goldwater, 1964 GOP Presidential nominee, just before retiring from the Senate in 1986.
• ”When these political action committees give money, they expect something in return other than good government. … Poor people don’t make political contributions. You might get a different result if there were a poor-PAC up here.” — Bob Dole, former Republican Senate Majority Leader and 1996 GOP Presidential nominee, in 1983.
• “Money is the mother’s milk of politics.” — Jesse Unruh, Speaker of the California Assembly in the 1960s and California State Treasurer in the 1970s and 80s.
• “I had a nice talk with Jack Morgan [i.e., banker J.P. Morgan, Jr.] the other day and he seemed more worried about [Assistant Secretary of Agriculture Rexford] Tugwell’s speech than about anything else, especially when Tugwell said, ‘From now on property rights and financial rights will be subordinated to human rights.’ … The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson … The country is going through a repetition of Jackson’s fight with the Bank of the United Stated — only on a far bigger and broader basis.” — Franklin D. Roosevelt in a 1933 letter to Edward M. House. (Thanks to LH, via email.)
• “Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government, owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people. To destroy this invisible government, to dissolve the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of the day.” — 1912 platform of the Progressive Party, founded by former president Theodore Roosevelt. (Thanks to LH, via email.)
• “There are two things that are important in politics. The first is money and I can’t remember what the second one is.” — Mark Hanna, William McKinley’s 1896 presidential campaign manager and later senator from Ohio, in 1895.
Again, please leave other good examples in the comments or email them to me at any time — I’ll keep updating this indefinitely. I’m looking specifically for working politicians (rather than pundits or activists) who describe a tight linkage between money and political outcomes (as opposed to something vaguer).
Each of the public officials quoted in this article, in their moments of unguarded frankness regarding the political system, forgot to add the following:
” . . . and I myself am a perfect example of what I’m talking about here.”
Jess Unruh also had a corolllary to “mothers milk”.
If you can’t take their money, f—– their women and vote against them then you don’t deserve to be here” (the Legislature).
However, having known Jess I also believe he would have been passsing legislation to correct our current corruption.
Hasn’t anyone noticed that Bernie Sanders and The Donald have a lot of policy overlap, like maybe 70%? Politicians for sale is probably first on the list.
But folks, what Bernie is selling is fundamentally the source of the problem.
Big government = more to merchandise.
There is no question that money leaves its mark on politics. But despite waves of protest against the unfair influence of large corporate donations on election outcomes, The Supreme Court of the United States has repeatedly declared this practice to be completely legal.
In return, politics has begun to leave its mark on money. A current political crusade against large corporate contributions in election campaigns has seized upon U.S. banknotes as its personal billboard, now sells rubber stamps to Americans and urges them to proclaim the #getmoneyout message in red-ink block letters on millions of U.S. treasury notes of all denominations:
http://www.budgetsaresexy.com/2014/04/is-it-or-is-it-not-illegal-to-draw-on-dollars/
These protesters claim that their actions are “100% legal.” Evidently they disagree with or ignore president Obama’s warning that defacing money is a federal crime:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/05/president-obama-wont-sign-dollar-bill-noting-it-crime/
To date, the Obama administration and its regulatory officials have ignored this growing blight on America’s currency. As a litmus test for any political candidate in the 2016 elections, we might pose the question: “Is it really legal to write on money?” and if the answer is no, what legal action might the candidate take to put a stop to it?
There is no correlation between what’s legal, and what’s honest!
You’re absolutely right, Mr. Minor. What I would honestly hope to see in the upcoming political campaign is some candidate appear on the scene with the guts, determination and resources to mount a legal challenge to this mindless mass defacement, debasement and in short, disrespect of U.S. currency and by extension of the U.S.A. electoral process itself, under the guise of calling for “fairer” elections.
If you bring a bullhorn to a debate in order to shout down opposition, is that not an infringement on freedom of speech? Yet, that is exactly what SCOTUS legalized when it declared that money is a form of speech. When well-financed groups support candidates by such quid-pro-quo contributions or are allowed to buy unlimited ads in direct support of a candidate, this is what we get. The little guy with his $25 donation to the candidate of his choice can’t compete with that.
You have left out one of the most outspoken people on this subject who is now running for the Democratic nomination for Presidency and that is Bernie Sanders. He has spoken out about this for most of his political life and is out there right now on the campaign trail talking about income inequality and how we have to have a constitutional amendment to end Citizens United. He does not have a super pac and does not get money from Wall Street, oil companies, or any large corporations. He is running a pretty effective campaign on just what he gets from individual contributors. Please include him on your list. He certainly deserves to be there.
I am very happy to join with anyone, anywhere, via the internet, in supporting the candidacy of Senator Sanders.
Bernie Sanders.. A yes the new prophet for change. What about the fact that he is a strong supporter, promoting the Crimes by Israel in Palestine! He has a dual Citizenship with Israel just like Shumer – another of Netanyahu’s puppets. Meanwhile the US supports these Israeli criminals with our tax money. Billions and billions – while Palestine is NO threat to the US ..
Amazing to see what happen to the Jews under Hitler and now Netanyahu does the same to Palestinians . It’s called Genocide ! I hope someone would have the guts to take care of this Schmuck! called Netanyahu.
Karine–two seconds on Google got me to this:
Sichel tracked down a mention of Sanders being a dual citizen in the comments section of a Facebook page, where a user had posted a list of senators and representatives who “have both Israel and U.S. citizenships.”
“No source is given,” Sichel wrote, “because the list is a total fabrication”
http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/article/2015/jun/11/backstory-behind-diane-rehms-question-bernie-sande/
I have to say, after reading the Freakonomics article, i felt funny. After years of economics in school, i found myself offended by that article. I whole-heartedly know it is a propganda piece.
So…a bunch of senators, usually as they retire, tell us how corrupt the rest of Congress is? Makes sense. Here’s a funny idea: instead of telling us how corrupt everything is AFTER you could have done something about, how about some of you hypocrites DO SOMETHING about it while you are IN power? Campaign finance reform legislation, maybe? Term limits, possibly? No…you want to enjoy the gravy train while you’re on it, then complain about it and point fingers at others on your way out, so you can think of yourselves as being ethical. Worthless crap, the lot of you!
Great contribution, proof positive aids the political revolution.
I can’t help but laugh at the fact that a quote from Ted Cruz was included, given that he’s basically describing himself. He recently boasted about raising $38-million toward his campaign, but anyone that looks into it will see that something like $35-million of that came from just FOUR people. So when Sen Cruz acknowledges that a politician’s ears are open to the highest bidder, bidders who are effectively conspiring against the majority of Americans, he’s including himself, intentionally or not (I tend to think he’s well aware of the irony of that statement but is unashamed of that fact and hopeful that the rest of us don’t make that connection.)
As far as who else speaks out about this issue, as others have said, Bernie Sanders. He’s making this one of the cornerstones of his campaign in promising not to accept SuperPAC money. When I saw him speak in Madison, WI earlier this summer, he mentioned the “disastrous” Citizens United ruling, and “oligarchy” is a term he uses often. Of course Citizens United is just one cog in a Supreme-Court-failure machine stretching back nearly 40 years that established corporate personhood and determined that money = speech.
Likewise, fellow firebrand Progressive Elizabeth Warren recognizes this issue as well.
“The other thing nobody talks about in this city is, I was directly told “You want to be chairman of House Administration, you want to continue to be chairman.” They would actually put in writing that you have to raise $150,000. They still do that – Democrats and Republicans. If you want to be on this committee, it can cost you $50,000 or $100,000 – you have to raise that money in most cases.” –Bob Ney
BOB NEY here
http://www.talkradionews.com/congress/2013/03/06/former-rep-bob-ney-says-washington-is-still-highly-corrupt.html#.Vbws0vNViko
“The United States Congress […] is now incapable of passing laws without permission from the corporate lobbies and other special interests that control their campaign finances.”
Al Gore – Former Vice President of the United States
Great article! Thank you. God bless America!
Bernie Sanders acknowledges this every day.
You could add Hillary Clinton to the list, too, but she just learned it from Bernie.
Come on people! Look at Bernie Sanders platform! Stop ignoring him! He has designed a campaign completely out of small individual donations! We need debates and we need them now! Let him speak to everyone and I know his grassroots movement will inspire you to leave behind the big money candidates. GET BEHIND BERNIE OR CONTINUE BE SCREWED BY YOUR GOVERNMENT!
YOU WANT CHANGE IN AMERICA:1- Irony: The right is wrong about everything!!!! And we are living that irony. 2- STOP VOTING FOR THE GOP!!!!! The former is why we need to do the latter. Do you want a progressive in the White House? There is only one way that can happen. Civics 101: The Primary Vote. The primary vote is the most important and the most neglected in our electoral system. The primaries are where We The People choose who our “Front Runner” is. Hillary Clinton is no more a “Front Runner” than Bernie Sanders. This is just media propaganda funneling our vote for a conservative, corporate, Wall Street friendly Dem. We all know where Hillary stands on this. Bernie Sanders is a Democrat candidate. He has been approved by the DNC to run on their ticket. If a progressive wins the primary by a wide margin over any other candidate then the DNC will have no choice but, to nominate them. Plain and simple THIS is how our system works, all propaganda aside. The country is coming out in droves to see Bernie in overflowing auditoriums. Even in conservative states he’s climbing and beating Hillary in the polls. If Bernie won the primaries I believe he would win the presidency, the country is ripe for a progressive, we are starving for it. Stop! Buying into and spreading the propaganda “We can’t have a progressive for president”. Because, that is all it is, propaganda. Not Reality. So, I say let’s “HACK THE SYSTEM BY USING IT!!!! GET OUT THE PROGRESSIVE PRIMARY VOTE!!!!”
THIS is how we SHOULD be talking the elections. Let’s not fall victim to the Billion Dollar, Propaganda Media telling us who to vote for. That is relinquishing our citizen and civic responsibility. Our system, the primaries, the protocol of voting, IS REALITY. Learn and stick to the plan, the basics, all propaganda aside.
Please, share, share, share and repost this everywhere. If you like my message and you think it is important for others to see, be my guest and pass it on. I’m trying to change the way we look and think about our electoral system. So I’m counting on all of you to help. I would love for people to get in touch with the media and try and get them to reframe and change the conversation. Also, bug the Bernie Sanders for President Campaign and ask him to bring it up at public speaking engagements. We need a massive get out the progressive primary vote like we haven’t seen in generations.http://voteforbernie.org/
18% of Americans believe they’ve seen or been in the presence of a ghost? Looking into this deeper, I found it was about 9% a decade ago. 15% have also consulted a fortuneteller or psychic. Add in some of these other figures and I think it’s safe to say the U.S. will be forever doomed by the tyranny of stupidity.
http://www.salon.com/2014/12/20/7_things_americans_think_are_more_plausible_than_global_warming_partner/
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/10/30/18-of-americans-say-theyve-seen-a-ghost/
What about Bernie Sanders? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZaekogALkFM
Hey Jon (flails arms), read this:
http://noosphere.noblogs.org/news-15-07-31/
Your timeliness nailed this. Thanks to WikiLeaks we now know the TPPA will forbid governments from doing anything for their citizens if there’s even a snowball’s chance that any corporation might profiteer instead. Companies now officially have more power than governments.
Hi Jon–so glad you’re writing here. Below is one of my favorites, from Bo Pilgrim, former head of “Pilgrim’s Pride”–largest producer of chicken in the US.
“It does not infer a bribe.”
Quote from NYT article “Texas Businessman Hands Out $10,000 Checks in State Senate”.
http://www.nytimes.com/1989/07/09/us/texas-businessman-hands-out-10000-checks-in-state-senate.html
Here’s Bo, just in case you’re curious to know what he looks like.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fd/Bohead.jpg
What a tiny ego for such an important man. :-s
Is the political system fucked? Carter decries unlimited political bribery, yet creates the DOE (whose predecessor’s goal under Nixon was to create energy independence) which funds bullshit academic research of the Higher Ed Industrial Complex and any other Industrial Complex, at tax payer expense… then the US arguably achieves (or can achieve) energy independence through shale plays…but but Tom Corbett is named as being named a beneficiary to the shale fracking companies at the start of this article (more bribery).. the ones who (gas companies that is) arguably can provide energy independence (nominally cleaner than coal and safer than nuke, but more reliable than any existing alt energy source) not the DOE or public research institutions (and not at taxpayer expense)….
How do you sort through this shit show? See what is happening?
Maybe the U.S. gov should only be in the biz of delivering the mail, if even that?
I’ll close with this:
“But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.”
The U.S. is still the No 1 power in the world, but it’s day will come when it to will collapse. That’s just history….
The “glaringly obvious reality” is a damning indictment of voters, who are dependably swayed by the media circuses which these campaign funds buy. The voting process itself is what needs to be reformed.
If your market was truly free and not halfway controlled by the government then you would see a lot of this evil ended.
Thank you, Joseph. What many people don’t connect is that this is only possible because there’s so much centralized political power in Washington, D.C. for these interests to buy. If power were radically decentralized, this sort of corruption wouldn’t be possible.
Hahahahahaha
“Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce. And when you realize that the entire system is very easily controlled, one way or another by a few powerful men at the top, you will not have to be told how periods of inflation and depression originate.” President James Garfield 1881
It looks like that’s a sort of mangling of what he did say:
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/James_A._Garfield
“It would convert the Treasury of the United States into a manufactory of paper money. It makes the House of Representatives and the Senate, or the caucus of the party which happens to be in the majority, the absolute dictator of the financial and business affairs of this country. This scheme surpasses all the centralism and all the Caesarism that were ever charged upon the Republican party in the wildest days of the war or in the events growing out of the war.”
@ Jon Schwarz
Here is an interesting article……
Thought money could buy an American election? You ain’t seen nothin’ yet
Gary Younge
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/apr/06/money-bought-elections-us-donation-rules
AND, these politicians have the audacity to accuse the so called “third world” or “developing” countries of CORRUPTION!!!
The hope is that someday soon enough politicians will admit this corruption of big money in our democracy. It might be a long wait, but it has and will happen.
My performance piece, is now on YouTube. It is a political satire, entitled “Washington Money Talk”. Here is the link; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etPwzJvhxyI
I mean this one isn’t a presently sitting Representative or Senator, or even an American, but he knew the score:
Corporations are not people, money is not speech, and campaign donations are not protected free speech.
Every Subprime Court Justice who says otherwise is a liar and a disgrace.
Extra, Extra, read all about it: we can now reveal that money controls politics!
Louis D. Brandeis, associate justice, SCOTA: “We can have democracy in this country or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can’t have both.”
Whoops! That’s SCOTUS, not SCOTA.
Whoops! That’s SCOTUS, not SCOTA.
Interesting (perhaps) parallel between SCOTUS/SCOTA and SCROTUM/SCROTA. ;-}
Dave Anthony – Money does not buy votes? It obviously does it congress. You need to make your response on the fox news forum where it may make sense to their less intellectual viewers.
Oh, absolutely it buys votes in Congress. I meant that policians having money doesn’t guarantee their electoral success, i.e. it doesn’t buy the votes of citizens. Many politicians have run big expensive campaigns and still lost miserably. But yes, absolutely, campaign contributions buys congressional votes and influences national policy.
Which is why the candidates are selected long before popular vote ever gets to know them. They are previously screened by wealthy elitists to ensure that whomever actually wins, their agenda remains intact. Thus, who we vote for doesn’t matter (the officially backed candidates with big campaigns). And, the amount of money spent to get elected is peanuts compared to the flow of money that continues coming in as a result of silencing public scrutiny.
Money doesn’t buy votes but it does buy policy. If you want to get the money out of politics you’ve got to get the politics out of money. Liberals support this vast regulatory state and then act surprised when it’s heavily manipulated in favor of the companies with the biggest lobbying budgets.
Well Dave, conservatives don’t want to pay any taxes and are fine with big corrupt businesses running and ruining the world. You’re a shill and a puppet! Your culture of ignorance is really stupid and wrong.
The word “regulations” has a connotation that is inexorably tied to one’s politics. For instance, so-called conservatives tend to categorize legislative adjustments to the tax code to allow rich people to deduct the costs of their private jets as “incentives”, and legislation designed to prohibit my friendly local coal company from dumping poison into the stream from which the town gets its drinking water as the product of a “vast regulatory state”. The categorization of our political class as “liberals” and “conservatives” has little meaning now that large monied interests control the majority of the votes in both branches of the Party. But to the little people, the miniscule differences between those branches is sufficient to rouse strong emotions and debates.
The “vast regulatory state” actually has very little to do with obviously needed environmental regulations, such as the ones you describe. A very large percentage of the federal register is filled with arbitrary and capricious “rules” or “regulations” that don’t benefit the general public in the slightest.
What nonsense. Western Europe has far larger governments in relationship to their size, and rank as the least corrupt nations on earth. The regulate money coming into to political campaigns and it works.