The Justice Department’s internal watchdog says his problems getting access to critical information while performing his job will only get worse now because of an ambiguous legal opinion from the department, which says inspectors general do not in fact have access to “all” information.
“Just yesterday I’m told in our review of the FBI’s use of the bulk telephony statute — a review that this committee has very much been interested in our doing — we got records with redactions,” Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz said during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Tuesday.
On July 23, the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel published a lengthy opinion delving into the powers of the Inspectors General, concluding that, contrary to the law that established the job in the first place, they can have timely access to information “most” of the time rather than all.
The opinion said that IGs should not be given access to some information unless there is a defined counterintelligence or legal purpose, to be decided by a team of the department’s own lawyers—not the IG’s.
The OLC opinion specified three instances when separate federal statues might delay or restrict IG access to sensitive records: grand jury materials, wiretap records, and credit reports. However, the FBI has listed ten other types of information of “concern” that it may choose to limit access to in the future, just in case the disclosure of the documents breaks any other laws.
The ambiguity of the opinion might make that possible, despite the OLC’s insistence that it didn’t “intend” to override Congress.
That’s what concerns Horowitz and others who worry that allowing the FBI to comb through its own documents before allowing the inspector general to inspect them defeats the purpose of independent oversight.
Photo of Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz, Associate Deputy FBI Director Kevin Perkins, Associate Deputy Attorney General Carlos Uriarte, and Acting Commerce Inspector General David Smith testifying at the Senate Judiciary Hearing on August 5.
IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT.
What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government.
This is not hyperbole.
Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.
Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.”
The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy.
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
I’M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
Latest Stories
The End of Roe
A “Scheme” Against Dobbs: SCOTUS Dissent Hints at Next Phase of Abortion Rights Fight
Justice Clarence Thomas argues the Comstock Act, passed in 1873, prohibits the mailing of abortion medication.
Internal Pentagon Report Reveals Hegseth Is Willfully Putting Civilians in Danger
A damning Department of War report finds that the Pentagon didn’t fully implement any required civilian harm mitigation measures.
CDC Didn’t Tell New York About Resident on Hantavirus-Plagued Cruise
There’s no indication that the New Yorker had imminent plans to return to the U.S. But public health experts said the city and state still should’ve been informed.