Hacked emails show that movie mogul Harvey Weinstein, a longtime ally of Hillary Clinton and a major fundraiser for her 2016 campaign, urged her campaign team to silence rival Bernie Sanders’s message against police shootings of African-Americans. He suggested countering it with “the Sandy Hook issue” — a reference to Sanders’s opposition to lawsuits against gun manufacturers.
The emails were released by the group DCLeaks, which in the past has shared hacked emails from U.S. political and military figures. The U.S. Intelligence Community announced Friday that it is “confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails” that were made public “on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona.”
The Weinstein emails were among a large number of messages DCLeaks made public on Thursday, from the gmail account of Capricia Marshall, a close Clinton confidant who worked for her in the White House and the State Department, and worked on her 2008 campaign.
In an April 10 email sent to Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook, just days before the New York primary, Weinstein invited Mook to meet up. He pointed to a Sanders ad featuring Erica Garner — the daughter of Eric Garner, who was killed by New York City police officers — as well as growing support for Sanders among Latino activist leaders. “I’m probably telling you what you know already, but that needs to be silenced, probably with the Sandy Hook issue,” he wrote:
Mook wrote back replying to Weinstein’s offer to meet up and discuss strategy: “Are you kidding? Let’s do it! I’m here all week. This is all hands on deck–it’s must win! Would tomorrow or Tuesday work?”
Throughout the primary, Clinton repeatedly assailed Sanders for his vote to limit legal liability for gun manufacturers, specifically claiming that vote was preventing the families of victims of the Sandy Hook massacre from successfully suing the industry. It was a feature of her attack on Sanders during their final debate in New York on April 14.
Sanders, meanwhile, countered with his otherwise strong support for gun control measures — and this incredibly powerful ad:
Weinstein is a prominent New York City-based film executive who co-founded Miramax Pictures and the Weinstein Company with his brother Bob. He is currently producing a documentary that will highlight the need for prison reform with the rapper Jay Z.
It was not the only instance in the hacked emails where Weinstein discussed political strategy with the campaign. On February 17, Weinstein sent Mook and Marshall a David Brooks column titled “Livin’ Bernie Sanders’s Danish Dream,” where the conservative columnist chastised Sanders for wanting to adopt much higher taxes as well as an expansive welfare state.
“This article gives you everything I discussed with you yesterday. You have the name of an economist, you have a great NY Times writer and you have a number from the WSJ. Let’s discuss,” Weinstein wrote.
“About to forward some creative. Took your idea and ran,” Mook wrote back. “Yes – this is good!” Marshall responded.
On April 17, Brad Thompson, a senior vice president of corporate communications at Weinstein’s company, sent an email to Mook and other Clinton aides highlighting some press clips of Weinstein praising Clinton and making remarks critical of Sanders. “Harvey got some solid press coverage from his CBS This Morning appearance on Friday. I hope you got a chance to see it – if not, below is the video link and the press pick-up. Harvey and I both can’t thank you enough for helping prep for this interview. Your advice was spot on – especially relating it back to his conversations with his daughter,” Thompson wrote.
The Clinton campaign and Weinstein did not respond to requests for comment.
Weinstein and Clinton attending the premiere of “Finding Neverland” on October 25, 2004 in New York City.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Producers_(2005_film)
At the debate with #Bernie2016 #HRC kept hitting the gun issue and even lied about the guns going into other states coming from Vermont!
There seems to be a divide and conquer agenda in place that suggests that tragedies are staged/executed in order to further a political agenda, much like the Reichstag Fire, but now we have many.
“RICH LIVES MATTER”
What is important to note is that you have to be a millionaire in order to get a response or help from both parties. To be honest, I don’t find The Intercept much different. Try writing to this author or even Greenwald, whom I both respect, about any issue that concerns you. The latter even blew off Snowden, remember?
faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Picking sides is actually against the by-laws of the D.N.C. Debbie Wasserman Schultz led the campaign against Bernie Sanders – blocking his media coverage….and delaying funds collected for him… No Hillary is not innocent.
IF you have a corrupt political party you can not expect an honest election result…. That play truthful for both parties – as they block the third party candidates – by the rules both parties set-up to insure their dominance..
Short of revolution I do not think it is possible to get an honest election
It goes without saying I am voting third party, because there may be a chance of a honest election – doubtful….but
Would you support one after the elections are over? If a third partier doesn’t win we’re stuffed either way,
Wikileaks noted the “neo-McCarthistic hysteria” that is being trotted out in an attempt to distract from the content of the leaks at their “press conference” the other day.
Apparently, our establishment thinks that countering the numerous claims in the material that has been leaked isn’t possible… nobody would believe them and it would draw attention to what they want people to ignore.
Has anybody read the excerpts from Hillary’s speeches and decided that they don’t sound exactly like what she has said before?
No.
It’s her alright.
Personally, I think the establishment would have been better served by putting out viral videos of cats or hanging dangling shiny objects from every light pole.
Their idea of effective distraction isn’t very compelling.
I respect Sanders for following the rules but he lost because his opponent had an unfair advantage which was HRC’s campaign didn’t follow the rules. We need less rules
The only person who has mentioned leveling the playing field is Trump. In the first debate between him and HRC he stated he was going to deregulate. This country is buried in regulations. Our economy will explode if the burdens of laws are decreased.
No we need less corrupt candidates! We need people with integrity and the humility to make it work for everyone! Bernie Sanders started his campaign with leveling the playing field. Nobody cared! The cheeto is not the second coming. They both suck!
Phil is one of these libertarian morons you see.
Harvey Weinstein thinks David Brooks is a “great NYT columnist.” Enough said. He sounds as out of touch as Clinton.
brooks son proudly served in the israeli army but would never serve in the American army. nuf said.
“Hillary” is going to discover the disadvantages of running for president unopposed in a democracy.
The reason I left the Democrat (I no longer call it “Democratic” because, it is NOT) Party this summer was because of the primary rigging, electoral fraud and bias of MSM and smears against Sanders and his supporters. So, they have forever lost my vote, up and down ticket. They now act worse than the Republicans in the electoral process; quite an accomplishment.
Unless they put up some very progress candidates with ethics, they have lost my vote forever. That includes Senators Warren and Ed Markey and Rep Neal, for taking part in the voter disenfranchisement scheme known as primary “super-delegates”, or as I call them “super predators”. I find that totally unacceptable.
If I vote for any Dem in the future, it will not include a penny of contribution, a single bumper sticker or yard sign, or the tiniest bit of work for their campaign.
For the most concise political commentary on the upcoming train wreck of an election, I suggest readers that they watch the videos of Jimmy Dore, comedian and one of The Young Turks commentariat.
Jimmy Dore is on YouTube.
“…Weinstein invited Mook … “I’m probably telling you what you know already, but that needs to be silenced, probably with the Sandy Hook issue,” … So Hillary portrays herself as the answer to the needs of Black Americans while running a campaign to subvert one of the major issues concerning them of the day. Well, let us take a moment to either not stand, or take to a knee while we further consider a couple of other matter:
The LA Times exposed the Hillary Super Pac spending $1 million to pay trolls to argue pro-Clinton talking points online. “Be nice to Hillary Clinton online — or risk a confrontation with her super PAC” see:
http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-clinton-digital-trolling-20160506-snap-htmlstory.html
The article points out “It is meant to appear to be coming organically from people and their social media networks in a groundswell of activism, when in fact it is highly paid and highly tactical,” said Brian Donahue, chief executive of the consulting firm Craft Media/Digital.
This type activity is just like what Hillary’s statements represented during paid speeches to Wall Street…” said Clinton. “So, you need both a public and a private position.”
So in essence this is just further proof that she is an advocate of lying, deception and falsehood…There it is, and that is all anyone needs to know to reject her. And further considering these utterance of hers’ to Goldman Sachs, we’re just “a bucket of losers” who have “low social capital.” should enable even those on the fence about her to now want to drive a stake in her vampire heart.
And no Trump is not the answer, nor is joining hands with evil in embracing the ploy of submitting to the lesser of two evils.
I anxiously await the deceitful responses of Hillary’s paid trolls.
“I anxiously await the deceitful responses of Hillary’s paid trolls.”
Karen will be here shortly …
“I anxiously await the deceitful responses of Hillary’s paid trolls”
Your deceitful claim below already beat them to it.
“So Hillary portrays herself as the answer to the needs of Black Americans while running a campaign to subvert one of the major issues concerning them of the day. ”
Where is there any evidence that Hilary is subverting this issue.
The pro Russian trolls certainly have the plurality on The Intercept
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/02/putin-kremlin-inside-russian-troll-house
“Where is there any evidence that Hilary is subverting this issue. ”
Boy, you got that one right. She’s not subverting BLM, she’s ignoring it!
“Where is there any evidence that Hilary is subverting this issue.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxnyKSDOTKI
You’re welcome, Joe McCarthy.
The boilerplate is back…and even better.
Previous incarnations include–
Lee Fang & Naomi LaChance wrote:
In another article, Zaid Jilani wrote:
So the first question I have is who really wrote this copy?
Is this what Zaid wrote and believes, and then Lee and Naomi just copied off of him? Did Zaid copy from Lee or Naomi? Or did someone else write this copy and insert it over the objection of the authors?
These are question that deserve to be answered because either the ownership/management is inserting copy under the name of journalists (because no one would listen to them if they put it under their own byline), or certain journalists are conspiring with each other to undermine their own reporting.
Public and private beliefs are contradicting each other.
Lets’ get to the ‘updated’ boilerplate.
We went from
“a hacker that many allege to have ties with Russian intelligence”
to
“The U.S. Intelligence Community announced Friday that it is ‘confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails’ that were made public ‘on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona.”
Wow that is a huge story that obviously deserves much more than a passing mention in a government ass kissing boilerplate–this is essentially a declaration of war against Russia. Except it is being made by the “Intelligence Community” (which somehow deserves a capital “C”).
Let’s look at the ‘evidence’ presented.
———
DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
WASHINGTON, DC 20511
October 07, 2016
Joint Statement from the Department of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence on Election Security
The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscow—the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.
Some states have also recently seen scanning and probing of their election-related systems, which in most cases originated from servers operated by a Russian company. However, we are not now in a position to attribute this activity to the Russian Government. The USIC and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) assess that it would be extremely difficult for someone, including a nation-state actor, to alter actual ballot counts or election results by cyber attack or intrusion. This assessment is based on the decentralized nature of our election system in this country and the number of protections state and local election officials have in place. States ensure that voting machines are not connected to the Internet, and there are numerous checks and balances as well as extensive oversight at multiple levels built into our election process.
Nevertheless, DHS continues to urge state and local election officials to be vigilant and seek cybersecurity assistance from DHS. A number of states have already done so. DHS is providing several services to state and local election officials to assist in their cybersecurity. These services include cyber “hygiene” scans of Internet-facing systems, risk and vulnerability assessments, information sharing about cyber incidents, and best practices for securing voter registration databases and addressing potential cyber threats. DHS has convened an Election Infrastructure Cybersecurity Working Group with experts across all levels of government to raise awareness of cybersecurity risks potentially affecting election infrastructure and the elections process. Secretary Johnson and DHS officials are working directly with the National Association of Secretaries of State to offer assistance, share information, and provide additional resources to state and local officials.
——–
“the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations” is embarrassingly ambiguous especially for a march to war. Was it the DNC leaks or not? Which specific emails are you talking about?
Wait, “alleged hacked emails”? So if the emails were hacked, then they were definitely hacked by Russia or just allegedly? Do you have evidence or not?
“on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks” So did DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks publish (allegedly) hacked emails or just sites “like” DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks?
“are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts”
That’s your smoking gun people. And for the kicker–this is our march to war.
Those mobile chemical weapons labs are getting more credible by the minute.
That joint statement and the resulting uncritical press repetition is much better evidence that the “Intelligence Community” is trying to interfere with our elections, than it is that Russia is trying to do the same–simply because the accusations are evidence free.
I went from twitter to the intercept website because the “document” attached did not have any semblance to an email. There was no header, no to: no from: and no date.
As you know, the intercept website’s “email document” is the same. Why do you expect your readers to accept that a transcript looking document is an authentic hacked email? Did I miss something?
Even though it could all be true, I’m not comfortable going off on Clinton, for fuc@k sakes, nothing was even supposedly written by Hillary. Third party doesn’t make her complicit, that’s hearsay!
Plus, it wasn’t even supposedly written by Weinstein.
Was there any fact-checking? I didn’t see any cross-referencing to articles or other hacked emails of the day. Why did you assume that African American was code for BLM? Why did you assume that “he” was Sanders? What about that date at the bottom, was it 2004?
Like I said, unless I’ve missed something, IMO you have nothing, no proof, no evidence.
But people here are talking like it’s gospel – she’s a liar, I’m voting for Trump, ashamed for my children, corrupt, she knew, she’s evil, on and on. You must know they don’t look further than your headline,,,
I’d like to hear from the African American community right now, on just how they’re feeling about this, seeing the Hillary campaign for what it is now. Now does anyone still believe that all of those PURGED VOTER LISTS during the Primaries, were just one big happy Democratic Party accident? I never believed it and I still don’t. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz was not acting out of pure love for Hillary, nor was any local district Democratic Party hand who involved themselves in purging those lists, right before the Primaries. In my opinion everyone involved with Clinton is dirty, just as dirty as Harvey is for involving himself in this nightmare on American soil. A nightmare that has left out a major chunk of the CITIZENS who vote, and blocked a very good and decent candidate from being the Nominee. I’ll be doing all that I can going forward to avoid anything that has the Weinstein name or label connected to it. GO straight to hell, Harvey. You are no better than Dick Cheney or Condi Rice – you’re as scummy as they are. ANTI-DEMOCRATIC, plotting, scheming, liars – all of you.
The secret of the Clinton’s success is that they share the graft, thereby involving many others who will protect them. They’re not greedy, and that is why they are successful, and you are right, they are ALL very dirty. The ONLY benefit of a Trump presidency is that he might have investigated and prosecuted the Dem corruption machine. If he came out and promised that, I might even vote for him.
It’s so sad that she might become president. I worry for my daughters
So, Hillary has a forked tongue. And people don’t want to know she has one? How can anyone vote for this woman? Her eyes show how evil she is. Can’t anyone see?
Harvey used to frequent the store I worked at.
He’s a dick.
“U.S. Intelligence Community announced”
Please don’t repeat CIA lies.
Heads up, girls and boys! Excerpts of $shillary’s Goldman Sachs speeches have been published by Wikileaks and “lee, Zaid, Alex & Naomi have a piece up here.
One of my favorites, so far:
That’s “Lee,” as in Fang. Sorry, Lee.
So Hillary has a “public” and “private” position on what, everything? Can you name one politician that doesn’t (other than Jill Stein)? At least with Stein you know she’s not bought an paid for.
So she has a “public” and “private” position on what, everything? Which means what? She and Bill are really racists who hate that black guy Obama?
Hate is a strong word, they acknowledge that back home in Arkansas he’d be getting them coffee is all.
Can anyone name me one important institution not either owned or controlled by Jews? Why is it the only thing one need do to be labeled an anti Semite is to call a Jew a Jew? I guess since they think they own you, you shouldn’t ever criticize them no matter how egregious the conduct. What ever happened on the complaint filed against Harvey with the police? Evidently he saw a very attractive woman at one of those little Hollywood get to gathers and he walked right up to her and grabbed her by the vagina. True story. The hubris of some Jews is absolutely amazing. From the persecuted to the persecutors.
It’s not. You have to do and say other things. As you have.
You’re an anti-Semite.
Studies show that anti-anti-Semites are more likely to be involved in serious crimes than either the anti-Semites or Semites . . . apparently both as victims and victimizers. The psychology involved is not well understood.
Any… not owned by a jew? Are you like nuts, look around or are you blind? Men are men and do stupid things.
You are an antisemite. Please go away.
The Catholic Church? Morgans, Scaifes, DuPonts, Mellons, Bushs’, Rockefellers…..
He’s a zionist like most Hollywood are.
Trump talking about women; It’s called man talk. Yes, men have been talking this way for years…nothing new here.
Let’s see, a political supporter gives a candidate some advice. HORRORS!!!1!!1! UNDEMOCRACY!!!
We really don’t even know if it was acted upon. TOOBADHILLARYBEAST!!!!!
In fact, since the Russians have already been caught manufacturing and/or editing e-mails, we don’t even know if this is legit. ARGLEBARGLE YARRRRGH!!
Wow, the droolers come out in force for this non-stuff.
Evidence? Citation?
Doug, you need to stop that. Hillary supporters — like Israel apologists (who are often the same people) — feel harassed when you decline to believe unsupported, tendentious fact claims. You are not creating a safe space for the Hillbots, Doug. That’s very mean.
Welcome back, Joe McCarthy! Thought you drank yourself to death?
5 things that tell you nearly all you need to know about Weinstein’s lack of critical thinking skills:
1)He thinks David Brooks is a great writer.
2)He thinks David Brooks is a great writer.
3)He thinks David Brooks is a great writer.
4)He thinks David Brooks is a great writer.
5)He thinks David Brooks is a great writer.
I thought the same thing. Then I thought about Robby Mook pretending to be excited about the news. Then I thought about the circle jerk that is entertainment-politics. Then I thought about poor Georgina Chapman being married to Weinstein.
Then I got sad.
Brooks wrote a column where he explains how the Jews have become America’s new aristocracy. Brooks is also a Jew.
Seconded. This is just as offensive as the news story itself.
I think he was referring to Paul Krugman, since the part was about economics, and Krugman has lost all credibility by being a shill for Clinton (hoping for a new job, universities don’t pay well, NY Times is cutting back, etc.).
Zaid, a suggestion? Please leep a running “# out of # requests for response answered by”, updated with each request, so we can occasionally and unscientifically rank these craven bastards.
Or “keep” a list. Whatever works.
It must be October;The surprises are out.Trump caught in private discussion from 05 where he states if you are a star women(married or not )will have sex with you.
Duh.
He gets graphic(pussy ,and nice tits,later in the conversation)towards the end,He apologized if he offended anyone.
He also said Bent Dick says much worse on the golf course!(so do most of us of course)
A very funny guy.Trump for POTUS.
We got to kick out the jams.
Holy cow,it knocked Mathew off the airwaves.
I’ve never in my life seen such venom for any domestic political actor than the raw hatred from the zionist MSM for Donald Trump and America First.A monolith of total anti Trump from every quarter,and why?
What have they got against US?
Wapo goes wikileaks.Will they reveal the source?Or the amount of silver?
atta boy glenn, you and julian keeping doing everything you can to undermine hillary as much as the right wing extremists.
BERNIE IS NOT RUNNING!!! he did not get enough votes to get nominated. he won’t win through a write in vote. hillary will not bow out or die in preference for bernie. gary johnson is a rich white capitalist elitist who’s full of **it, not an alternative. double that for jill. jeez, move onto other topics.
Hillary is a right-wing extremist. Her campaign has already undermined itself by associating with neocons, rich pseudo-leftists like Weinstein, and other “deplorables.” It’d odd how this website pointing out facts is the problem, not the fact she and her campaign have done the things pointed out.
If your handle didn’t tell me enough, why in gods name do we have to keep silent about evil Hilary and her big money bags backers? Why? You guys set up your incredibly corrupt system and NOW you want to silence it– seriously? Do you know the saying, made your bed now lie in it?
If you’re too fucking lazy or myopic to even read who the author of the article is, I can’t imagine how little you comprehended of what few words within the article that you might have bothered to read.
C’mon, now, Kitt, sure you can imagine. You just don’t want to.
You can’t handle the truth — it’s just too fucking depressing. ;^)
It’s crap comments like these that further reinforce my decision not to vote for HRC.
But you do make a strong case that perhaps burning the whole thing down for four years with the Orange Menace may not be such a bad idea.
It is not only RW extremists with disdain, distaste, utter contempt, and a mighty aversion to a Hillary Clinton candidacy. Stop blaming some people/media outlets for Sec’y Clinton’s failings.
I have this fantasy which keeps me sane. Hillary will get out for the good of the party and Bernie will, of course, step in.
Jill Stein is a white, elitist capitalist, who is full of shit? Or not an “alternative?”
She is definitely an alternative.
None of these articles, which I love madly, will make me change my mind. There is nothing that anybody can do or say that will make me cast a vote for a President Clinton. As long as somebody leaks hacked or private conversations, whether email or vocal, there is a great audience. It’s not always this small minded, but let’s not discourage transparency in any form.
Speaking of Julian, when did he say he was holding a press conference? I thought it was this past Wednesday.
Very very interesting and illuminating of how such small minded powerful moguls belief in their fellow like small minded MSM compatriots being correct and effective outside their hive is an amazing phenomenon.
Such is the borg.
And the Russians did it!The US Intelligence community.Oxymoron indeed.
The fix is in,was in,and many just sit there nodding along in acquiescence.Simply amazing.
Exactly
if you are not a PAC or SUPERPAC, then you can co-ordinate with a campaign to support a candidate of your choosing and then get more billions from American fools willing to pay.
VOTING FOR JILL STEIN IS A WIN.
i can prove it.
I don’t care where the info is coming from, because this is the first time in current US history that we have detailed documentation about how a major US political party conducts itself during a campaign. We are in on detailed examinations of the candidate’s behavior while occupying high political office. We get to see a demonstration of how voting for the “least worst” option has worked out. Nauseating.
Could Hillary Clinton be a bigger piece of shit? How can anyone who considers themselves a Liberal, Progressive, or a democrat ever support such a horrible person? If you look at her record and at her policies, she’s a republican–and if you’re willing to vote for a republican just because they have a “d” after their name on the ballot then you’re an imbecile who doesn’t deserve the right to vote. If you’re willing to vote for Crooked Hillary then there’s absolutely no reason that you should be a member of the democratic party.
Nope. And of course her campaign will say ” we don’t support that view”, that didn’t come from us… yadda yadda yadda…
Exactly look at the policies, votes and follow the money (backers)
Before some moron says something groundbreaking like “Who is really surprised by this?” in a burst of creativity,
What’s genuinely odd in this news item:
1) BLM were total softies to Hillary’s campaign; one of the most famous things any of them were ever involved with was messing over a rally with Sanders in Seattle; meanwhile they went and got lectured by Hillary and took it. Why they needed countering from this outfit, in other words, is beyond me.
2) How exactly “police shootings” could get cancelled out by “not suing gun manufacturers” is beyond me. But then I don’t get how “The DNC was in the bag for HRC” was supposed to get cancelled out by “Putin spied on us!” either. I guess this is dopey MSM strategy from people who believe in that, for example by shitty Hollywood people.
Apparently Weinstein’s principles only extend to opposing Republicans.
“How exactly “police shootings” could get cancelled out by “not suing gun manufacturers” is beyond me.”
Now you are stating the obvious.
Hillary might loose Black votes if she’s grilled over BLM so let’s grill Bernie on guns instead.
Is that simple enough for you?
Odd that you know what doesn’t cause trouble. At least you always have that in your corner, right …
Yeah, you don’t know what you are talking about. But it’s clear Weinstein’s brilliant “don’t look at that, look at this!” strategy would work on YOU anyway, so I guess it’s the “appealing to the limited mental capacity” trick at work.
“I guess it’s the “appealing to the limited mental capacity” trick at work.”
And you didn’t recognize it for what it is. OK.
You sound like you could be one of Nate’s teachers. There is certainly a common denominator involved. But that’s just based on your limiting posts; you can’t even claim ESL … home-schooled maybe? Do paint chips taste sweet like I’ve heard?
You’re just getting out there in the world and, well, you are going to make errors in judgement. I feel an obligation to provide your comeuppance.
Not for your benefit but for the adults who are destined to interact with you.
swing and miss, swing and miss, swing and miss, swing and miss
Whine-stein: the University of Buffalo has just rescinded your degree. You scumbag you.