Skip to main content

Pentagon Slams Colin Kaepernick in Pearl Harbor Tweet, Then Deletes It

The Defense Department briefly seemed to endorse criticism of Kaepernick by Adm. Harry Harris, then thought better of it.

Colin Kaepernick #7 of the San Francisco 49ers kneels for the National Anthem before their game against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers at Levi's Stadium on October 23, 2016 in Santa Clara, California. Photo: Ezra Shaw/Getty Images

The head of the U.S. Pacific Command decided for some reason that Wednesday’s commemoration of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor 75 years ago was the right moment to take a swipe at San Francisco 49er quarterback Colin Kaepernick.

“You can bet that the men and women we honor today — and those who died that fateful morning 75 years ago — never took a knee and never failed to stand whenever they heard our national anthem being played,” Adm. Harry Harris asserted.

Kaepernick has famously been sitting or kneeling during the pre-game playing of the anthem since August because, he’s said, “I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color.” (He is righter than you know.)

The Department of Defense twitter account then tweeted video of Harris’s comments, with the text “#PACOM Commander: Pearl Harbor vets ‘never took a knee. never failed to stand’ during National Anthem.”

twitter-dept-defense-1
Source: Google Cache

At some point after that, the Defense Department deleted the tweet, although it still can be seen via archive.org.

A Pentagon spokesperson said it had been deleted because reaction to it “suggested that that tweet had been perceived by some as an official DoD endorsement of a position on a political or social issue. … Based on that we made the decision to take it down.” Pentagon guidelines forbid members of the military from taking actions which “imply or appear to imply DoD sponsorship, approval, or endorsement of a political candidate, campaign, or cause.”

Harris himself arguably violated a Pentagon directive that states that “A member of the Armed Forces on active duty may … register to vote, and express a personal opinion on political candidates and issues, but not as a representative of the Armed Forces [emphasis added].” Harris, of course, spoke in uniform — at a military event.

Beyond the mini-drama of the Defense Department’s twitter account, Harris obviously has no way of knowing that everyone in the Navy who was at Pearl Harbor consistently leapt to their feet for the rest of their lives at the playing of the Star Spangled Banner.

American veterans are much like American nonveterans, and while polls show a majority of Americans disagree with Kaepernick’s actions, almost 30 percent do agree.

Moreover, only one in five African-Americans disagree with what Kaepernick has done, while 64 percent support him. This is significant because there were many African-American sailors at Pearl Harbor — and as a matter of 1941 military policy they were consigned to the Navy’s lowliest roles. Clark Simmons, a mess attendant on the U.S.S. Utah during the attack, later remembered that “The Navy was so structured that if you were black, this was what they had you do in the Navy — you only could be a servant.”

Similarly, Nelson Mitchell, probably the last surviving African American sailor from Pearl Harbor, described his experience in the Navy like this in 2010: “We couldn’t be a gunner’s mate, couldn’t be a machinist’s mate, couldn’t be a boson’s mate. We was restricted to one branch, and that was the officers. We cooked for ’em, laid out their clothes, and shined their shoes, and give ’em their coffee and food and anything that they needed for their comfort. That’s what we do.”

IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT.

What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government. 

This is not hyperbole.

Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.

Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.” 

The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy.

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.

We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.

In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.

That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

I’M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.

We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.

In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.

That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

Latest Stories

Join The Conversation