Opposition to retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, Donald Trump’s pick for national security adviser, is spreading across Washington’s national security establishment. “You want the national security adviser to be a calming more than an exciting influence,” said Gen. Michael Hayden, former head of the Central Intelligence Agency and National Security Agency, at a luncheon on Wednesday held at the Fort Myers Officers’ Club. “Mike tweets more than his boss.”
Twitter is a source of ongoing controversy, both for Flynn himself and one of his sons, Michael Flynn Jr., who has used his account to propagate the “PizzaGate” conspiracy theory, which posits that Comet Ping Pong, a Washington pizzeria, is a den of nefarious Democratic activity. After a man who claimed to be investigating PizzaGate fired a gun at Comet Ping Pong on Sunday, the Trump transition fired Michael Jr.
The elder Flynn has kept his distance from PizzaGate. But, as Hayden suggested, his own Twitter rants are even less statesman-like than those of the president-elect. On Twitter, Flynn has asserted that “Fear of Muslims is RATIONAL,” and claimed that Democratic Party emails contain evidence of “Sex Crimes w Children” and occult “#SpiritCooking.”
“You can’t be considered credible if you’re trafficking in bad information,” said David Rothkopf, CEO and editor of Foreign Policy, who once served in the National Security Council and wrote a book on its history. “Calling Islam a cancer is bad information. Trafficking in fake news, that’s bad information.”
“I’m watching a clown show,” said Philip Mudd, a former CIA and senior FBI official, on Tuesday. Mudd criticized Flynn for his behavior at the Republican National Convention, where he led the crowd in anti-Hillary Clinton “lock her up” chants. “I want to see a transition from a campaign to reality,” Mudd said. “I’m not seeing it yet.”
The willingness of key establishment figures to speak out against Flynn is unusual in official Washington, which tends to perpetuate itself through a culture of understatement and accommodation. As Trump’s national security adviser, Flynn would be the president’s main link to the Principals Committee, the main organ for setting foreign policy and responding to crises within the White House. The appointment does not go through the Senate confirmation process.
Past presidents have chosen national security advisers with stronger backgrounds in strategy and policy, such as Colin Powell and Brent Scowcroft.
Gen. Barry McCaffrey, who had previously endorsed Trump’s choice of Flynn, told NBC on Thursday that the was “extremely uneasy” about the Flynn family’s tweets, which “border on being demented.”
Hayden, who also voiced qualms about Flynn, spoke at a luncheon held by a group of former overseas defense attachés, some of whom would have worked under Flynn when he led the Pentagon’s Defense Intelligence Agency. Hayden expressed broader concerns about the number of high-level military and intelligence staff — Flynn among them — who have left the outgoing administration on bad terms and then sought out jobs with the incoming one. He called it “a bleeding over of the hyper-partisanship of Washington into our community. That is really, really bad.”
During the campaign, Hayden pushed back against the plausibility of Trump’s promise to bring back waterboarding. He was among a group of former officials who signed a letter in August stating that Trump is “not qualified” to be president and would be “dangerous” and “reckless” in office. The incoming Trump administration, Hayden suggested on Thursday, knows less about the world than some of its predecessors. “National security looks different from the Oval Office than it did from a hotel room in Iowa,” he said. “People like us then begin to push against this less well-informed — not less well-intentioned — but less well-informed view of the world. It just seems to me that the incoming administration has a higher a priori knowledge set than the average administration coming in.”
Flynn has also drawn criticism for the private company he founded after leaving government in 2014, Flynn Intel Group. One of the company’s clients is a Turkish businessman who has been linked to the country’s autocratic president; its other clients have not been disclosed.
Most of the company’s homepage disappeared earlier this month.
Top photo: Retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn delivers a speech on the first day of the Republican National Convention on July 18, 2016, at the Quicken Loans Arena in Cleveland, Ohio.
IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT.
What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government.
This is not hyperbole.
Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.
Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.”
The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy.
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
I’M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
Latest Stories
Voices
Kash Patel Is Using MAGA’s Favorite Tool to Muzzle the Free Press
By suing The Atlantic for defamation, the FBI director is leveraging one of Trump’s legal tactics to tamp down free speech.
License to Kill
Trump Has Already Spent at Least $4.7 Billion Attacking Latin America
It’s not cheap to attack Venezuela and capture its president or conduct dozens of strikes on civilian boats.
ChatGPT Confessed to a Crime It Couldn’t Possibly Have Committed
A renown criminologist’s experiment with ChatGPT demonstrates the destructive power of police to elicit false confessions.