Skip to main content

Facebook Is Demanding Personal Information From Political Advertisers, Raising Privacy Concerns

The social media company will require address verification, an identification scan, and last four digits of your Social Security number.

Mark Zuckerberg, chief executive officer and founder of Facebook Inc., departs for a break during a joint hearing of the Senate Judiciary and Commerce Committees in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Tuesday, April 10, 2018. Zuckerberg apologized, defended his company, and jousted with questioners while agreeing with others during his first-ever congressional testimony. Early reviews on his effort to restore trust with lawmakers and the public were mostly positive. Photographer: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images
Mark Zuckerberg, chief executive officer and founder of Facebook Inc., departs for a break during a joint hearing of the Senate Judiciary and Commerce Committees in Washington, D.C., on April 10, 2018. Photo: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images

As fallout from the Cambridge Analytica scandal continues, Facebook has rolled out a new authorization process designed to deter political ads and official Facebook accounts that intend to disrupt elections. In order to be verified, anyone wanting to run political ads now has to fork over the last four digits of their Social Security number, a government ID, and a residential mailing address.

Facebook officials on Tuesday briefed House Democratic Caucus staffers on the new authorization process to run political ads and official Facebook accounts on the social media platform, telling the press aides that beginning this summer, every page admin for both organic content and ads must be authorized through the two-week verification process available now. (This is assuming all congressional Facebook accounts fall under the rules for political and top-followed accounts.)

An invitation to the meeting, titled “Expanding Your Audience with Facebook Ads,” said the briefing was on “best practices for running Ads on official accounts.” In a back-and-forth with Facebook officials, some aides expressed concern over giving the social media platform their personal information and asked how their privacy would be protected and why the change was necessary, according to Democratic staffers who were at the meeting.

“It’s a huge overreach by Facebook,” one Democratic aide told The Intercept. “They’re going to solve the problem by collecting more data? To figure out if I’m a bot?”

A Facebook spokesperson said the company would not repurpose the information it collects to verify an advertiser and that the information is deleted after authorization is complete.

“It’s a huge overreach by Facebook.”

The new verification process to help “ensure transparency and authenticity in political ads” quietly went live on Monday and is currently only available in the U.S. It applies to anyone wanting to run political ads, which Facebook defines as: “an ad that is made by or on behalf of a candidate for public office, a political party, or a political action committee; that advocates for the outcome of an election to public office; that relates to the voting in an election for public office; that relates to any national legislative issue of public importance in the place where the ad is being run; or that is otherwise regulated as political or election-related advertising.”

Advertisers are also required to disclose who is paying for the ad. And to confirm the mailing address, Facebook will mail a letter with a unique access code. It’s an expansion from what the company first outlined in October, when their proposed steps for “additional transparency” said advertisers running political ads would be forced to verify only their location and identity. In April, Facebook tightened the rules to include “issue ads,” in addition to election-related ones.

Just two weeks ago, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg testified before members of Congress and answered questions on the harvesting of user data by Cambridge Analytica, Russia’s election interference, platform monopolies, and its privacy practices, among other issues.

Update: April 26, 2018

This story was updated with comment from Facebook.

Top photo: Mark Zuckerberg, chief executive officer and founder of Facebook Inc., departs for a break during a joint hearing of the Senate Judiciary and Commerce Committees in Washington, D.C., on April 10, 2018.

IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT.

What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government. 

This is not hyperbole.

Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.

Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.” 

The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy.

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.

We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.

In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.

That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

I’M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.

We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.

In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.

That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

Latest Stories

Join The Conversation