Skip to main content

J.D. Scholten, a Progressive Who Almost Unseated Steve King, Concedes in Iowa Race

Scholten rejected the possibility of help from the DCCC, saying that he didn’t need their support to win.

SIOUX CITY, IOWA - APRIL 18:  Former Iowa 4th district Congressional candidate J.D. Scholten poses for a portrait in Sioux City, Iowa April 18, 2019. The number of presidential candidates have increased over the past several months as Democrats campaign across the state of Iowa as they prepare for next year's Iowa Caucus and the 2020 presidential election. (Photo by Joshua Lott for The Washington Post via Getty Images)
Iowa 4th District congressional candidate J.D. Scholten poses for a portrait in Sioux City, Iowa, April 18, 2019. Photo: Joshua Lott/The Washington Post/Getty Im

J.D. Scholten, the progressive populist who nearly defeated Steve King two years ago in Iowa’s ruby-red 4th Congressional District, conceded to Republican state Sen. Randy Feenstra. As of Tuesday night, Scholten came in almost 30 points behind his opponent, who unseated King, a nine-term incumbent and white nationalist who had been censured by his colleagues in the House and stripped of his committee assignments, in the primary.

After King’s loss, analysts like the Cook Political Report downgraded the district from “tilt Republican” to “solid Republican.” This also led the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, which encouraged Scholten to run against King a second time, to deprioritize the race.

“Building trust takes time and standing up to the status quo and establishment is no easy feat,” Scholten said on Tuesday night in a statement.

Scholten had been laser-focused on the issues that led to his unexpected success in 2018: Working toward universal health care, breaking up corporate monopolies, and enacting campaign finance reform. He continued to dramatically outraise his opponent through mostly small-dollar donations. He raised $815,637 in the third quarter alone, according to Federal Election Commission filings, compared with Feenstra’s $456,869. And a recent poll from Monmouth University had previously found Scholten closing the gap, with his GOP opponent, who’s backed by President Donald Trump, holding a 48 percent to 42 percent lead among registered voters.

Scholten also ran an entirely grassroots campaign that prioritized meeting and listening to voters, wrapping up a 374-town tour (that adhered to social distancing guidelines) across the sprawling rural district in late October. Feenstra, meanwhile, avoided voters altogether. The state senator, who has corporate donors and is just as anti-immigrant and pro-Trump as King is, hadn’t made as many public appearances as Scholten and only debated him once. Trump won the district by about 27 points in 2016.

In July, Scholten officially rejected the possibility of receiving any help from the DCCC, as The Intercept previously reported, saying that he doesn’t need their support to win and that he will continue to run the campaign his way. “We have an authentic campaign that reflects who I am and my vision for this district,” Scholten said in a statement announcing the decision. “We won’t be beholden to special interests or the DCCC; instead, we’re reaching out to folks across the political spectrum to earn votes.”

As a first-time candidate, Scholten came within 3 percentage points of beating King and built a remarkable base of support in the process. He outperformed nearly 40 percent of the candidates in the DCCC’s “Red-to-Blue” program, which targets seats that have a promising chance to flip. He almost didn’t run for the seat again, at one point openly weighing a run for the Senate seat currently held by Joni Ernst. But DCCC head Rep. Cheri Bustos “begged” him to run against King a second time, he said, and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer helped clear the field for Theresa Greenfield, who’s now the Democratic Senate nominee.

“The way the DCCC’s system is, candidates like me, they don’t really care much about,” Scholten said over the summer. “If I could self-fund, they’d be all over me. I mean, the organizing and just the grassroots organization, we created something that’s so authentic and so organic that I don’t think they know how to deal with something like that. We need more working-class people in D.C., and their system is not made for that.”

IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT.

What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government. 

This is not hyperbole.

Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.

Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.” 

The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy.

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.

We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.

In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.

That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

I’M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.

We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.

In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.

That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

Latest Stories

Join The Conversation