Skip to main content

Kamala Harris Refused to Meet With Uncommitted About Gaza — and Uncommitted Refused to Endorse Her

The movement counts among its ranks many disillusioned Arab and Muslim voters in the key swing state of Michigan.

US Vice President and 2024 Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris speaks on the second day of the Democratic National Convention (DNC) at the Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, August 20, 2024. (Photo by Mahka Eslami / Middle East Images / Middle East Images via AFP) (Photo by MAHKA ESLAMI/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images)
Kamala Harris speaks at a rally in Milwaukee, Wis., on Aug. 20, 2024, during the week of the Democratic National Convention. Photo: Mahka Eslami/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Image

The Uncommitted Movement announced Thursday that it would not endorse Vice President Kamala Harris as the Democratic candidate for president. 

“Vice President Harris’s unwillingness to shift on unconditional weapons policy or to even make a clear campaign statement in support of upholding existing U.S. and international human rights law has made it impossible for us to endorse her,” Uncommitted said in a statement released alongside a Thursday morning press conference.

The group said at the press conference that the move came after Harris refused to meet with Uncommitted. Uncommitted delegates gave Harris until September 16 to meet with them in the crucial swing state of Michigan. The deadline passed earlier this week. 

Uncommitted leaders and other observers were initially optimistic that Harris’s nomination would lead to a policy shift toward Israel and Gaza, even if they were sober about Harris’s strong pro-Israel record. As Harris cemented Democratic support behind her nomination, her campaign picked up its efforts to conduct outreach to Arab and Muslim voters.

Related

Kamala Harris Mentioned Palestinian Suffering — in the Passive Voice

After President Joe Biden withdrew as the Democratic nominee, Harris’s aides were wary of the public criticism that the administration had neglected Arab and Muslim constituents by sending billions of dollars of weapons to Israel. 

Uncommitted delegates and their supporters hoped that Harris would shift away from Biden’s unconditional support for Israel’s military. They also hoped that her willingness to call for a ceasefire before Biden and criticism of the government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meant she would take a harder stance against Israel’s human rights abuses. 

During the press conference Thursday morning, Uncommitted co-founder Abbas Alawieh said the group sent a letter to Harris and her advisers after the Democratic National Convention expressing disappointment that there were no Palestinian speakers on the main stage, reiterating their policy demands, and pointing to opportunities for Harris to engage. Alawieh said the campaign responded in a letter on Sunday and said it could not do anything to respond to their requests at the moment.

“Vice President Harris and her team failed to take the opportunity to empower the Uncommitted Movement to endorse her and to mobilize voters for her reelection,” Alawieh said.

The Uncommitted delegates to the DNC withheld their support for Harris last month in Chicago to pressure her to commit to immediately stop sending weapons to Israel and secure a permanent ceasefire. Communication between Uncommitted and the Harris campaign became further strained after the DNC refused Uncommitted’s request to host a Palestinian American speaker on the main stage at the convention. 

“For months, we have urged Vice President Harris to shift her Gaza policy so we could mobilize voters in key states to save lives and our democracy.”

Uncommitted said that while the group would not endorse Harris, it continues to oppose a Donald Trump presidency and is not recommending a third-party vote in the presidential election for fear that it could inadvertently boost Trump’s advantage in the Electoral College. The group urged uncommitted voters to cast anti-Trump votes up and down the ballot. 

“For months, we have urged Vice President Harris to shift her Gaza policy so we could mobilize voters in key states to save lives and our democracy,” the group said in the Thursday morning statement. “The DNC and the Vice President’s campaign fumbled even a small gesture to unite our party ahead of November by rejecting the simple request for a Palestinian American speaker.”

Harris’s campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The tenor of Harris’s public remarks denouncing the killing of civilians in Palestine was one of the things that gave some Democrats hope that she might change course on Israel and Gaza.

In July, NBC reported that the White House had toned down Harris’s criticism of Israel in a planned speech given in March, but during her nomination acceptance speech last month, Harris reiterated that she would always support Israel’s right to defend itself. While she acknowledged the destruction of Gaza, she used the passive voice to describe it.

The decision by Uncommitted not to back Harris may not hamper her chances at winning the White House in November, but it bodes poorly for the progress Democrats had aspired to make in engaging disenchanted voters — not just their Arab and Muslim constituents. At least 740,000 people voted “uncommitted” in Democratic primaries earlier this year.

Shortly after Biden stepped down, Uncommitted voters who spoke to The Intercept said that no matter who the Democratic nominee was, they would withhold their votes unless the candidate makes significant policy changes to stop the killing of civilians in Gaza. 

Shaneez Hamed, an uncommitted voter in California who previously said policy change in Gaza was a red line to secure his vote, told The Intercept on Wednesday that he was not planning to vote for Harris in November. 

“She is not going to support an arms embargo against Israel,” Hamed wrote in an email. “She repeated the same old talking points about Israel/Hamas with no real change in policy. And this is all in addition to the happy parade her campaign has been doing for getting the endorsement of a war criminal such as Dick Cheney. So no, I will not be voting for Harris in November unless she changes her foreign policy. I’m tired of paying taxes for ‘the most lethal army in the world’ to go and bomb poor people of the global south.”

Another uncommitted voter who spoke to The Intercept in July said on Wednesday that he was planning to vote for Jill Stein.

“As of now, Harris has not earned my vote, no,” said Washington, D.C., voter Will Dawson. “I held out early on in the hopes that she’d appeal to the demands of the Democratic Party of whom the overwhelming majority have called for an immediate ceasefire with threat of full arms embargo/boycott if not met. And she has doubled down, saying there is nothing whatsoever the Israeli colony could do that would cease America’s support.”

Update: September 19, 2024, 11:20 a.m. ET
This story has been updated to include reporting and quotes from Uncommitted’s Thursday morning press conference.

IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT.

What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government. 

This is not hyperbole.

Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.

Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.” 

The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy.

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.

We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.

In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.

That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

I’M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.

We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.

In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.

That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

Latest Stories

Join The Conversation