The Pentagon quietly scrubbed an advisory board’s website after a fired aide to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth complained that it was stocked with holdovers hostile to President Donald Trump who might be spreading damaging leaks.
The Defense Policy Board’s online roster was erased after axed staffer Dan Caldwell told Tucker Carlson in an interview that its members were “incredibly hostile” to Trump.
Caldwell was fired Friday amid a Defense Department leak investigation that has led to the ouster of several longtime Hegseth confidants.
In his interview with Carlson, Caldwell cast himself as the victim of a behind-the-scenes battle between warmongers pushing for conflict with Iran and skeptics of foreign military intervention such as himself.
Although the Defense Policy Board is an independent advisory group with no powers of its own, he blamed members including Susan Rice, a former Joe Biden aide, as potential sources of leaks for which he had been blamed.
“She and a bunch of other people who are incredibly hostile to the president and his worldview remain on the Defense Policy Board,” Caldwell said. “I would just say, if you want to look where leaks are maybe coming from, that would be a place to start.”
Caldwell did not offer any evidence. His complaints were soon amplified online, however, by former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn.
By Thursday of this week, the names of Rice and other policy board members had vanished from the Pentagon website. The change happened after Caldwell’s interview was posted to X on Monday, according to Internet Archive captures of the website.
Earlier this week, a Pentagon spokesperson told Responsible Statecraft that the list was “up to date.”
It is unclear whether the board’s members have been removed. The Defense Department did not immediately respond to a request comment.
If Hegseth has sacked board members, however, it would continue a series of dramatic changes to the board’s membership over the past five years.
After remaining largely intact for most of Trump’s first term, the Trump administration pushed out many of the board’s members in November 2020.
The likes of Henry Kissinger and Madeline Albright were replaced with Trump loyalists such as Newt Gingrich and Scott O’Grady, a former fighter pilot who shared calls for Trump to declare martial law in response to his election defeat.
Biden’s secretary of defense, Lloyd Austin, removed all the members of the policy board and 41 other boards just weeks into his tenure.
He eventually replaced Trump’s lame-duck appointees with establishment D.C. figures associated with former Democratic and Republican presidents, drawing heavily on Washington’s deep bench of liberal and neoconservative hawks. At the time the site went down, the board included figures like Rice and former ambassador Eric Edelman, who served as a Defense Department under secretary during George W. Bush’s presidency.
They and other board members could not immediately be reached for comment.
Board minutes posted online indicate that it has not met since last June.
It’s unclear why Hegseth, who has rapidly moved to remove officials affiliated with Biden from the Defense Department leadership, would have allowed Rice to receive sensitive information.
Caldwell argued that board membership would have given members such as Rice a pathway because it gave her a “credential and affiliation” with the Pentagon.
IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT.
What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government.
This is not hyperbole.
Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.
Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.”
The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy.
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
I’M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
Latest Stories
Voices
Dodging FOIA Could Now Mean Arrest and Strip Search, Depending on Who’s Asking
The DOJ is now treating evading a records request as a crime, a stunning act of hypocrisy from the Trump administration.
Voices
Big Finance Might Be Dooming the SPLC — Even Before Its Day in Court
Fidelity, Charles Schwab, and Vanguard are tamping down on the Southern Poverty Law Center’s donations as the government’s de facto censors.
Voices
Tennessee GOP Moves to Decimate Black Voting Power After Supreme Court’s Blessing of Jim Crow
With the Supreme Court blessing racial gerrymandering, Tennessee Republicans rushed to eliminate the state’s only majority-Black congressional district.