Skip to main content

How to Write About Palestine

A concise guide to proper media behavior when discussing the “complicated” situation.

A man carries a dead child at Nasser Hospital, Khan Yunis, Gaza on May 24, 2025.
A man carries a dead child at Nasser Hospital, Khan Yunis, Gaza, on May 24, 2025. Photo: Abed Rahim Khatib/Anadolu/Getty Images

Begin on October 7, 2023.

Nothing important happened before this date.

History began on October 7.

Never say the word “occupation,” and avoid using terms like “apartheid,” “segregation,” and “illegal settlements.”

Avoid writing about the wall. If you do, preface its existence by talking about terrorism and security.

Terrorism and security are very important words. Use them a lot in reference to Palestinians.

Remind your audience that Palestine is a “complicated” situation.

Avoid the word “genocide” — for legal and technical reasons, of course.

If you must use the word, put it in quotes.

Do not describe the escalation of Israeli hostility as an assault on the people of Gaza.

Instead, use words like “war,” and “conflict,” because that makes it easier to avoid the g-word.

When reporting on the dead, always use the passive voice, and don’t mention how they were killed or by whom.

As often as possible, remind your readers of October 7.

When writing about Palestinians, do not forget to center Israeli feelings. Although the Israeli military is dropping bombs and killing Palestinians, the real story is about the persecution of Israelis in the wake of October 7.

Avoid making everything even more complicated pointing out that antisemitism is a European invention.

Writing about Palestine mainly involves writing about Hamas.

Writing about Hamas is almost as important as writing about October 7.

Hamas is a person, a thing, a monster, a ghost.

Hamas is in every home.

Hamas is in tunnels and hospitals.

Hamas is in tents sleeping next to patients in wheelchairs.

Hamas is in ambulances that are buried with paramedics.

Hamas infiltrated World Food Kitchen and all the soup kitchens and schools; even the children’s souls have been infiltrated by Hamas.

Palestinian youths try to get a ration of hot food from a charity kitchen set up at a camp for displaced people in Gaza City, on May 21, 2025.
Palestinian children try to get a ration of hot food from a charity kitchen set up at a camp for displaced people in Gaza City on May 21, 2025. Photo: Majdi Fathi/NurPhoto/Getty Images

The October 7 Hamas attack can be described in any of the following ways:

  • horrific
  • brutal
  • gruesome
  • murderous
  • shocking
  • atrocious
  • harrowing
  • graphic
  • terrifying

On the other hand, when writing about attacks on Palestinians, no adjectives should be used.

It’s better to simply write something like “More than 90 killed in Gaza strikes.”

You do not want readers to think you’re taking a side.

When writing about Palestine, do not let facts get in the way of telling a good story. To this end, ignore Palestinian sources. They may be biased.

On the other hand, the Israeli military is a highly credible source of information.

If the Israeli army says nothing happened, then nothing happened.

When the army claims their troops didn’t rape Palestinian women or use civilians as human shields, or shoot children or journalists in the head with sniper guns, continue to publish their denials without comment.

Linking countries that fund weapons to the armies that use them fosters transparency.

So, when you write about attacks on Tel Aviv, it is important to mention that the missiles were fired by Iran-backed Hezbollah.

Do the same when you write about the Houthis.

Do not follow the same protocols when it comes to Israel.

The American-backed Israeli army makes its own decisions about when to drop American and British bombs.

When talking about Muslim communities, throw around phrases like “terrorist hotbed” and “Hamas sympathizers.” This works even when those communities are in the U.K. or America.

Repeatedly demonize people who peacefully protest for Palestine.

Center the voices of people living in Western countries who feel unsafe when they hear the phrase “from the river to the sea.”

Don’t ask your readers to imagine how unsafe children actually living, wounded, and dying in Gaza and the West Bank feel.

Do not ask them to think about whether mothers feel safe as they enter labor.

Do not write one single paragraph asking whether fathers burying their children have a right to feel unsafe in Gaza.


Related

The Media Calls Israeli Captives “Hostages” and Palestinians “Prisoners”


When writing about Palestine, try not to zoom into individual stories or write about the intimate details of people’s lives. Keep your focus on Hamas militants.

In fact, when writing about Palestine, try not to interview Palestinians at all. They might be Hamas or Hamas sympathizers.

If you must interview a Palestinian, always begin by asking them to condemn October 7.

After this, be sure to ask them to confirm that Israel has a right to exist.

Ask the same leading questions of anyone who looks like an Arab, or is Muslim, or who seems to sympathize with Palestinians.

Sometimes they will throw the question back at you and ask if you think Palestine has a right to exist. Ignore this line of questioning as it only leads to trouble.

When all else fails, remember:

Begin on October 7, 2023.

Nothing important happened before this date.

History began on October 7.

This piece borrows its satirical form from “How to Write About Africa” by the late Kenyan writer Binyavanga Wainaina. Many of the details and critiques of the media examples are from the excellent report put out by the Australian Islamophobia Register in December 2023. Written by Dr. Susan Carland, “A War of Words: Preliminary Media Analysis of the Gaza War” is a great resource. There are many articles online that can help you read more critically. Search “media bias Palestine,” and you’ll find dozens of reports.

IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT.

What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government. 

This is not hyperbole.

Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.

Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.” 

The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy.

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.

We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.

In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.

That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

I’M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.

We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.

In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.

That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

Latest Stories

Join The Conversation