Skip to main content

Fetterman Voted With GOP to Make Sure Trump Can Attack Iran Again

Most Democrats rallied behind a war powers resolution in the Senate, but not the caucus’s most vocally pro-Israel member.

Senator John Fetterman, a Democrat from Pennsylvania, at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, US, on Friday, June 27, 2025. President Donald Trump amped up pressure on Congress to speed the passage of his tax-cut bill as Republicans reached a tentative deal on the state and local tax deduction, one of the key sticking points in the negotiations. Photographer: Graeme Sloan/Bloomberg via Getty Images
Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., at the U.S. Capitol in Washington on June 27, 2025. Photo: Graeme Sloan/Bloomberg via Getty Images

In a Friday evening vote, the U.S. Senate rejected a war powers resolution that would have blocked President Donald Trump from making further attacks on Iran, despite widespread disapproval of last week’s strikes.

Senators voted 47-53, largely along party lines, on a measure offered by Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., that would have prohibited Trump from offensive measures while preserving his ability to defend U.S. forces.

Kaine’s resolution drew near-unanimous support from Democrats, including Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.

“I am hoping that the members of this body will stand up for the Constitution.”

In a floor speech Friday night, Kaine underscored the continuing need for the measure despite a fragile ceasefire, noting that Trump said as recently as Friday that he would be willing to bomb Iran again.

“I am hoping — I am realistic — but I am hoping that the members of this body will stand up for the Constitution, will stand up for the proposition that war is too big to be decided by one person,” Kaine said before his measure failed.

A single Republican, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., who often opposes foreign interventions, supported Kaine’s measure. Aside from Paul, the resolution drew pushback from Senate Republicans. Critics said it would prevent the U.S. from defending Israel, despite an amendment from Kaine specifically designed to address that concern.

“President Trump seized the moment — responsibly, constitutionally, and decisively,” said Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., the majority whip, on the Senate floor. “America and our allies are safer today because of it. The resolution from Senator Kaine is not needed — and I oppose it. If passed, it would prevent the president from protecting us in the future.”

Related

War Powers Resolution From House Democratic Leaders May Not Limit Trump’s War Powers

The strikes revealed divisions within the Democratic caucus. Progressives largely opposed the strikes outright, while some pro-Israel Democrats offered qualified or full support. One of the most full-throated boosters was Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., who voted against Kaine’s resolution.

Fetterman has emerged as a leading proponent of the use of military force against Iran.

“Blow it up! Blow it up! I think we should waste what’s left of their nuclear facilities,” he said in March. His aggressive stance has alienated former donors, who have requested refunds, and staffers, who have resigned at a steady pace.

“Anti-war Party”?

The war powers resolution was always considered a long shot, since it would have required the support of a veto-proof majority of both chambers of Congress.

A similar attempt in 2019 to end the Trump administration’s involvement in Saudi Arabia’s war on Yemen faltered when Trump vetoed it, and Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., pulled a similar resolution from consideration in 2022 amid pushback from Joe Biden’s administration.

Kaine’s measure, however, did put senators on the record about how they feel about Trump’s unpopular strikes. Americans disapproved of the strikes 56 percent to 44 percent, according to a snap CNN poll conducted immediately after the attack. The results mirror other surveys.

Many Democrats sought to criticize Trump without directly addressing the strikes by voicing concern over the administration’s failure to obtain congressional approval before the attack, or to adequately brief Congress after it.

“The Democratic Party needs to clearly stand up against this war.”

In the House, progressives and ranking committee leaders have offered two alternative war powers resolutions. Advocates say the version offered by Democratic leaders would do little to prevent Trump from launching future strikes if he justifies them as defending Israel.

At a press conference Wednesday, Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., said the party should back the tougher resolution, which he co-sponsored with Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky.

“The Democratic Party,” Khanna said, “needs to clearly stand up against this war and take the mantle again of being the anti-war party, the party that stands up against wars of choice, against these endless wars in the Middle East.”

IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT.

What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government. 

This is not hyperbole.

Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.

Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.” 

The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy.

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.

We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.

In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.

That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

I’M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.

We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.

In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.

That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

Latest Stories

Join The Conversation