FBI Director Admits Apple Case Could Be a Game Changer
Comey was really just admitting the obvious. Law enforcement agencies are already lining up to exploit what they consider a possible new tool.
Comey was really just admitting the obvious. Law enforcement agencies are already lining up to exploit what they consider a possible new tool.
Apple attorney Marc Zwillinger listed the requests in a newly unsealed response to an order from a magistrate judge in a Brooklyn federal court.
The Justice Department says Apple can destroy the hacking software it makes after it's used once. But other law enforcers are already lining up to use it themselves.
“Boycott Apple until such time as they give that information,” he said on Friday in South Carolina. “It just occurred to me.”
Both candidates tried to occupy a middle ground that doesn't really exist – either in the war between Apple and the FBI, or when it comes to the spread of unbreakable encryption.
The FBI reported 440 “terror disruptions” in fiscal year 2015, more than three times the “target” of 125. But what does that even mean?
The Twitterverse was full of fans. Civil liberties activists were cheering Apple on. But in Silicon Valley, the initial response was less effusive.
Apple CEO Tim Cook's open letter defying a court order to hack into an iPhone also asks for a public discussion about data privacy. He's getting it.
Researchers have compiled a list of at least 865 hardware and software encryption products available in 55 different countries — more than 500 of them come from outside the U.S.
Two members of Congress are challenging state-level proposals to restrict Americans’ ability to encrypt their phones.
This is not a paywall.
By signing up, I agree to receive emails from The Intercept and to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.