In the days after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, when Congress voted to authorize military force against the people who “planned, authorized, committed, or aided” the hijackings, few Americans could have imagined the resulting manhunt would span from West Africa all the way to the Philippines, and would outlast two two-term presidents.
Today, U.S. military engagement in the Middle East looks increasingly permanent. Despite the White House having formally ended the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, thousands of U.S. troops and contractors remain in both countries. The U.S. is dropping bombs on Iraq and Syria faster than it can make them, and according to the Pentagon, its bombing campaign in Libya has “no end point at this particular moment.” The U.S. is also helping Saudi Arabia wage war in Yemen, in addition to conducting occasional airstrikes in Yemen and Somalia.
Fifteen years after the September 11 attacks, it looks like the war on terror is still in its opening act.
The drawdown of U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan only revealed how little war has achieved and how much damage it has inflicted. In Afghanistan, the Taliban now holds more territory than it has at any point since 2001. One poll from 2016 found that more than 90 percent of young people in Iraq now consider the United States an “enemy” of their country.
The Islamic State, which was largely created by the U.S. invasion of Iraq, controls vast swaths of territory in Iraq, Syria, and Libya, and has demonstrated an emboldened capability to orchestrate attacks in Europe. In June, CIA Director John Brennan told Congress that “despite all our progress against ISIL on the battlefield and in the financial realm, our efforts have not reduced the group’s terrorism capability and global reach.”
Al Qaeda, the original enemy, today controls territory in Yemen and Somalia, but it is no longer considered a priority. In the span of one year, for example, the U.S.-backed war in Yemen quadrupled the size of al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula — the terror group’s most dangerous offshoot. The CIA has continued to arm Syrian rebels, despite the fact that those weapons have found their way to a former al Qaeda affiliate. Retired Gen. David Petraeus, formerly the commander of U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, actually suggested arming al Qaeda directly to help fight ISIS.
Despite the lack of progress, the last 15 years of war have come at a horrific cost.
The U.S. lost nearly 2,300 service members in Afghanistan, and nearly 4,500 in Iraq. Hundreds of thousands were forever damaged. Those figures do not include at least 6,900 U.S. contractors and at least 43,000 Afghan and Iraqi troops who lost their lives.
The death toll in the countries the U.S. attacked remains untallied, but conservative estimates range from the hundreds of thousands to well over a million. Add to that the hundreds of people tortured in U.S. custody, and thousands killed by U.S. drones in Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia.
The financial cost of the war on terror is incalculable. The Iraq and Afghan wars, including the medical costs for veterans, are estimated to end up costing the U.S. at least $4 trillion dollars. Intelligence budgets have doubled, on top of more than $800 billion spent on “homeland security.”
Billions of dollars have been wasted on fruitless projects — like a failed plan to install radiation detectors at airports, which cost the government $230 million. The Department of Homeland Security wasted $1.1 billion on a “virtual fence” of sensors along the Mexican border before scrapping the program. The examples go on and on. The CIA paid one contractor $20 million to build a program that could discover encoded terrorist messages in Al Jazeera news broadcasts. Just last year, the Pentagon spent $43 million on one gas station in Afghanistan. Two contract psychologists were paid $80 million for designing the CIA’s torture program.
After 15 years, the only winners in the war on terror have been the contractors.
At home, the war on terror has become a constitutional nightmare. The U.S. has adopted a practice of indefinitely detaining terror suspects. Police departments across the country secretly import military-grade spy equipment. Courts have ruled that families cannot sue to get their children off government kill lists. NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden revealed that the U.S. has become the largest surveillance state in history.
In the 2016 presidential campaigns, torture has become one party’s applause line, in no small part due to President Obama’s failure to prosecute the architects of the Bush-era torture program.
Bombing multiple countries in the Middle East has become business as usual, and often goes unreported. On August 1, for example, the day the Obama administration announced a new bombing campaign against ISIS in Libya, American journalists were far more occupied with post-convention election polls than they were with the new war.
All of this foreshadows a war that could stretch 10, 20, or 50 more years. As the U.S. shifts its strategy toward bombing and away from ground troops, media engagement with the wars diminishes, and it is all too easy to forget about our permanent state of war. But the victims of U.S. violence are unlikely to forget, creating a potentially endless supply of new enemies.
Top photo: The Tribute in Light illuminates the sky behind the 9/11 Memorial on September 10, 2014.
The fact that the US is bombing 7 Muslim countries: Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Libya, Syria, Somalia, and Yemen where NONE of the original nineteen 9/11 hijackers are from should tell you that the war on radical Islam is a LIE. Fifteen came from Saudi Arabia, two from UAE, one from Egypt, and one from Lebanon.
OK, but the hijackers were part of al-Qaeda. Afghanistan was invaded because of the al-Qaeda presence there. Iraq was invaded because of unfinished business in George Bush’s mind. Libya was bombed because of the US decision to depose Gaddafi and go after ISIS. Syria was bombed because of the ISIS presence. Somali was bombed because of the al-Qaeda/al-Shabaab presence. Yemen was bombed because of the AQAP presence.
It has nothing to do with the nationalities of the hijackers. Are you saying the US should have bombed Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt and Lebanon? That seems a bit out there.
We are manufacturing our own enemies to satisfy the war industry lobbyists. We should have a military draft and draft the kids of those war profiteers to fight their wars.
My first reaction to the Twin Towers being attacked was that even though we didn’t know who did it or why (at that time), it would give those in government who wanted to do so a perfect excuse for creating a police state. They’ve certainly done that with the Nazi-like Homeland Security and the Patriot Act. But as this article points out, they’ve also created endless wars. Dr. Strangelove, aka Henry Kissinger, must be coming in his pants.
911? You mean when the U.S. deposed Salvador Allende in Chile in 1973, led by the major war and human rights criminal, Henry Kissinger?
Thank you for continuing to report the news.
If the US is at war (declaration or not) the updates ought to be in every evening news broadcast, in every newspaper and every online publication! Day in and day out the public ought to demand information; these are bombs our taxes pay for, our elected officials authorize, and our children deploy.
I understand that the public is complicit in looking the other direction; but it certainly doesn’t help that information is kept out of the popular channels.
It’s devastating because I do believe that if politics were a little more honest, and the public were a little more interested in taking responsibility, we could be on a very different path right now.
WHAT IS WITH FACEBOOK BLOCKING THIS ARTICLE TO MY TIMELINE?????
See Greenwald’s Twitter chain here. Apparently, articles can be posted at FB, but not from this site.
OMG !!! FACEBOOK IS BLOCKING EVERY ARTICLE ON THIS SITE.
THIS IS UNREAL !!!!!!!
Let us see 60 Minutes examine this….no, that was just a dream and I’ve suddenly awoken. I should’ve known better.
Read as well:
Fifteen years since the 9/11 attacks
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2016/09/12/pers-s12.html
Socialism? Do you currently live in a socialist country? Those who promote it seem to be those at the top. Have you ever worked for an employer that didn’t give you a promotion, if so are you still working there? That’s socialism and it sucks!
Yeah but it really sucks when it’s true (no raises, vacation, etc) for half the country, while the other half, welfare state full on.
Great article Mr. Emmons, and very true.
The saddest part of all this is that the voters are faced with a choice between to candidates who are both disastrous on foreign policy. Hillary “never saw a war she didn’t like” Clinton has been itching for a fight with Russia over trumped up nonsense with regards to Russia “meddling” with American elections by exposing how corrupt they are. After her neoconservative adventurism in Libya as Secretary of State, which has helped destroy the country for the foreseeable future, and the broad support she’s received from the ultra far right hawks, her foreign policy should scare the hell out of anyone remotely interested in world peace (let alone peace in the Middle East or with Russia). On the other hand, Trump is all over the place. He, like Clinton, is a happy go lucky supporter of the Israeli enforced (and U.S. funded) apartheid in Palestine and has all kinds of crazy Generals with guns supporting him (i.e. the 88 Generals and Admirals who recently pledged their support to him) but he changes his mind so much there’s no telling what he’ll do.
One of these right wingers will, barring a cataclysmic unforeseen event, become the 45th President of the United States. What makes this situation even worse is that Congress will very likely remain in Republican control, thereby amplifying the danger and the damage that a Trump or Clinton foreign policy could do (if there’s one thing Clinton and the Republicans agree on, it’s bombing the hell out of some poor foreigners because empire!). For example, the House is dominated by an overwhelming +61 seat majority of Republicans, thanks to some masterful RNC gerrymandering, and that’s not going to meaningfully change for potentially the next decade. There’s a chance the Democrats could take the Senate but recent polls seem to indicate that the Republicans will cling to a 51-49 majority although a 50-50 tie is also very possible. The Democrats, led by Clinton, are going very, very far to the right and Trump is leading his followers off a cliff. Clearly, these are dangerous times we live in, both home and abroad.
It’s a sunny day if you are an arms contractor. The sources of revenue are bottomless. Imagine if those funds were instead delegated to reneable energy, education and infrastructure? We would have a much better society.
never ending wars because of what?
NEVER ENDING LIES AND FRAUD SAYS I
– wasnt AUMF enuf?
– wasnt disappearing Americans with NDAA enuf?
– wasnt a 5 TRILLION dollar hit from an illegal invasion enuf?
– wasnt wallstreet fraud that crashed the econ enuf?
– wasnt defraud in and falsifying documents and robbing investors and stealing homes enuf?
– wasnt selling the futures of our children to be as slaves for wallstreet thieves for repayment for education enuf?
– wasnt polluting our gulf waters and threatening our water supplies enuf?
– wasnt neglecting our infrastructure and poisoning the drinking water enuf?
– wasnt shipping our jobs overseas and destroying our unions enuf?
– AND NOW THE DEMS WANT TO GET A BRAIN DAMAGED ZOMBIE ELECTED TO THE PRESIDENCY!?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XtIzH9HoC8
Is this a country, or is this hell?
5 trillion was the estimate just for iraq and afghan, not the third leg of this stool. :)
Of course they did not spend $20 million on a computer program, or $43 million on a gas station, or $80 million for torture tips. They did not spend hundreds for a hammer or thousands for a toilet seat either. This is how they cook the books to conceal the theft of taxpayer funds. It was not by random chance that all of the documentation was destroyed in the strike on the Pentagon and the controlled demolition of #7 World Trade Center. And it was not by chance that the mainstream news media failed to report the connection.
Great article by Alex for a minute as I was reading I thought this might be Glenn’s work again great piece.
“neverending” only because the American people remain irresponsibly passive and permit the imperial ruling class to continue slaughtering our Arab and Muslim Brothers and Sisters.
We have to be careful about “neverending” because it makes it easier for Americans to think, “well, if the wars are neverending then there’s nothing we can do,” when in fact the American people have the power, the responsibility, and the opportunity to end these illegal wars, and to arrest, prosecute, and hang the war criminals and propagandists who’ve lied to us, and who’ve carried our crimes against humanity.
Exactly.
That must be put into writing. Any candidate for office must support this with a signature or they are worthless. Because letting the wounds the elite and their cohorts inflict on Americans fester will render the population desolate – and that is not a “good” way for America.
i suggest that all nondem and nonrepub parties merge on a common platform – keeping it simple.
This nonsense about helping other countries is good EXCEPT when it happens at the expense of Americans and except when it’s just a ruse and a conjob to advance the powers of political junkies for “foreign affairs” and corporate expansion.
Here here!
Typo : meant “carry out crimes” not carry our crimes
And no one has been held accountable for the failures (collusion) that started the whole mess–https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8y_qdw5pzU.
I was ultimately responsible for the attack. And last time I checked, I was dead.
Thanks, Alex. On this anniversary, this is the reporting that needs widespread sharing.
Meanwhile the American media is running headline stories about how Hillary got sick and had to leave a 9/11 memorial event she appeared at.
Brilliance.
As to horrific cost: 65 million refugees (2015 figures), more than at the end of WWII and more than the population of many sovereign state.
The more bombings, the more drones, the more violence, the more refugees, the less likelihood that they will ever be able to return to their lands. Lands that have been completely devastated, no viable infrastructure, poisoned with toxic, chemical weapons.
Many parts of the world are still grappling with the dangers of unexploded ordnance and exploding ordnance from as back as the 1800s and the effects of chemical weapons on humans and the environment.
it is as if AMERICA WERE TRYING TO DESTABILISE EUROPE.
They ARE trying to destabilize Europe – after al The Euro IS a competitor for Dollar hegemony. Remember Saddam wanting to trade oil for Euros – which led to him being invaded?
The most ludicrous 9/11 Tin-Foil-Hat conspiracy theory is that 19 Arab hijackers with little flight experience did it ALL by themselves.
9/11 was a Saudi funded Israeli Mossad operation. US officials didn’t know when an attack would occur, but knew their job was to have our Defenses stand down to maximize the effects.
Our own FBI could not connect Osama to 9/11. The Afghan Taliban said they would turn Osama over if shown some proof. None ever came.
Osama died December 2001. The SEALS did capture one of his sons, but threw the body away so there would be no positive ID.
Our govt is lying and corrupt. The wars are about oil, natural gas, and opium.
Evidence?
Maybe, maybe not. But, nothing will surprise me when it comes to the lengths humans will go to get what they want regardless of the devastating consequence to ‘others’. A ‘Gulf of Tonkin’ episode is not out of the question and human sacrifice has been around since the dawn of man.
Not.
There is some evidence that Israel had rather specific knowledge of the Arab terrorists’ plans beforehand and gave the U.S. only vague warnings because doing more would have revealed the extent to which they were spying on us, but no evidence for implicating Mossad in the attack per se.
How well-documented…not.
Ah, nobody says the 9/11 hijackers did it “all by themselves”, as you would know if you bothered to read the 28 (redacted) pages on the Saudi role in 9/11. Fairly large sums of money were needed for travel to the United States, flight school training, daily living expenses (food, rent, and travel), and of course the 19 first-class tickets purchased for 9/11.
Much of that money came from sources with close ties to the Saudi government, such as wealthy Saudi businessmen, Islamic charities, and Saudi Royal family members. Their only excuse seems to be that they were paying protection money to Al Qaeda to avoid Al Qaeda launching attacks within Saudi Arabia. However, the 28 pages seems to point to things like Saudi intelligence agents helping the 9/11 hijackers find housing in the U.S., etc.
As far as the “Israel did it” line, that’s a PR effort targeting the Arab world and promoted by the House of Saud and Pakistani ISI, probably to draw attention from their own historical complicity with Al Qaeda. Here’s a decent discussion:
http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2014/09/inside-jobs-and-israeli-stooges-why-muslim-world-thrall-conspiracy-theories
This isn’t to say that U.S., Saudi, Israeli etc. governments don’t try to run dirty schemes behind the scenes, covert regime change ops and so on, as in Libya and Syria – but look at the results! Every single one seems to blow up in their face, often pretty quickly. Clinton tried to pull this in Libya and install her puppet Jibril; gone in six months and now it’s another blowback. The PNAC plot to control Iraq and its oil, c. 2003 onwards? Iran ended up as the most influential outside country in most of Iraq. The Syrian war plan? Oops, we helped ISIS rise to prominence. Again, and again, and again. They just don’t learn from their mistakes. And these are mistakes, definitely, that severely injure their agenda of imperial control of oil resources in the region. Blowback galore.
As Douglas Rushkoff notes in “Conspiracy of Dunces”, 2007:
Seems very accurate to me.
Conspiracy of dunces are used as disinformation to bury obvious truths under a pile of half baked theories.
I read The Big Bamboozle by Phillip Marshall. Almost everything in it I had already known from reading main stream media before the government force fed everyone with their version of what happened.
A couple of his ideas I disagree with but most I consider as the truth. Apparently so did the CIA hit squad that killed him, his two teenage kids and their dog.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/10/opinion/bob-graham-release-more-9-11-records.html?hpw&rref=opinion&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=well-region®ion=bottom-well&WT.nav=bottom-well&_r=0
I spent years weighing the arguments coming from various quarters and I have to agree with your view that at least some of the info is disinformation that is intended to muddy the waters. This claim has been repeatedly echoed by proponents of various competing theories as well. For example, those who believe that nano-thermite was used to undermine the steel infrastructure of WTC buildings 1, 2, and 7 are so invested in that belief that they unable to consider viable alternatives. There is one fact that almost most every “truther” believes however is that the official explanation of the collapse of these building is pure bullshit.
The free-fall collapse of three high-rise, steel frame towers into their own foot print in a given day alone is beyond belief as the lack of inertial resistance alone violates the laws of physics. The claim that a jet fuel fire could simultaneously undermine the structural steel of any one of those buildings in a way that would account for the recorded direction, force, and speed of their collapse is pure nonsense – let alone three (albeit the #7 was attributed to diesel fuel). The problem with much of the Truth movement is that they feel compelled to offer an alternate explanation for the nature of the collapses the the onus is on the government is to provide an explanation that comports with observable fact and the laws of science.
This having been said, I am partial to the work of Kevin Ryan, David Ray Griffen, and Dr Judy Woods as each provides a uniquely informed perspective. For those who are largely unfamiliar with the work that has been done in disproving the official findings of the 911 commission, the Toronto hearings on 911 is a good place to start as you will reap the benefit of ten years of retrospection and the integration of diligent research from many fields of expertise. The views of Dr Judy Wood are also worth considering because she brings a unique blend of academic disciplines to bear in challenging the junk science of NIST researchers.
Here is a YouTube video of Kevin Ryan challenging NIST’s findings head on:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltgJLzMtbyM
“I have to agree with your view that at least some of the info is disinformation that is intended to muddy the waters.”
Welcome to the Alien and UFO conspiracy theories. I’ve heard a lot of people bring up valid points about corporate and government malfeasance then drift into talks about Aliens. At which point I calmly inform them that the latter topic invalidates the valid points that they had about the former.
“The free-fall collapse of three high-rise, steel frame towers into their own foot print in a given day alone is beyond belief as the lack of inertial resistance alone violates the laws of physics.”
That point alone should raise red flags in the minds of men.
ecommcon
Conspiracy theorists such as yourself love to raise “disturbing questions,” but disdain all answers but their own.
Also, what’s your source for that SEAL story?
I guess bin Laden’s public admission of responsibility for the attacks was staged then. As was the information given up by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed before he was waterboarded.
And the Iraq war was about oil? If that were true, one would assume that the US received substantial amounts of it. The entire Persian Gulf, however, only provides something like 12% of America’s oil. In 2012 Iraq provided the US with about 4.8% of its imports. Also, if the oil theory is true, why did the US support the UN oil embargoes against Saddam?
Also, the reason bin Laden was not charged with the 9/11 attacks was because the FBI didn’t need to. Bin Laden had publicly taken responsibility for the attacks. The “omission” merely reflects the government’s long-standing practice of relying on actual criminal charges in the notices. Likewise, the Taliban did give the impression that they were willing to give up bin Laden if shown proof. Ultimately, however, they reneged on this agreement.
Also, what is the evidence for the claim that the SEALs captured and killed bin Laden’s son? Or that the Saudis and the Israelis would ever entertain the possibility of cooperation?
We have been at war with these people ever since Thomas Jefferson was our President. We need a commitment to end it once and for all and it will involve us being more brutal than we really care to be.
Just drop all the nukes on us man and put us on the gallows or shoot us on sight. Be humane. Don’t just pretend about being more brutal than you have to be.
That’s not entirely true:
1) Comparing the Barbary pirates with modern Islamist terrorists is misleading. The actual Barbary states were led by Muslim rulers, but also had sizeable Christian and Jewish elements in the population and in the government. Likewise, in treaties with the Barbary pirates the Us government explicitly denied that it was at war with the Islamic religion.
2) the US struggle with the Barbary states actually goes back to Washington’s time
3) Ending it “once and for all” is a practical impossibility
Barbara Lee, Thank You for having the courage to stand up for the security of our world against incredible odds and insidious deception. The truth will prevail, and hopefully through efforts such as yours, so will peace.
This “war” wont end as long we keep calling it a “War”.
It is a thugry, a theft, a mafia activity, a murder. It is everything except a war.
It is a something by rich against the poor. It is a something of oppressor against the oppressed against.
If it is a war then it is a war against Humanity.
A perpetual War CRIME!!! USA! USA! USA! Jeeze Louise!
“All of this foreshadows a war that could stretch 10, 20, or 50 more years. ”
What it actually foreshadows is nuclear war, as the U.S. continues to encroach on and surround both Russia and China, in its reckless drive for world hegemony and its relentless lust for control of the Middle East and Caspian Basin, the “world island” described by Halford Mackinder in 1919.
How can the war stretch on for fifty years when the United States breaks up in just sixteen? Look for the non-renewal of the Compact of Free Association with Micronesia in 2023. (Maybe leaving Zika unchecked on Yap Island to infect the rest of the world without even noticing it was harmful to infants was not a winning move…) And Puerto Rico, well, that one is obvious. The rest should follow on pretty quick after that.
Es refrescante saber que se es contemporáneo con la Señora Lee, cuanta valentía, cuanta veracidad de comportamiento y de alma. Cuando la Sra lee rechazó las autorizaciones indefinidas para esa secuencia de guerras que hemos sufrido, estaba rechazando el asesinato de millones de habitantes del planeta y el horrible mundo en que tenemos que vivir en nuestros días. Salve a la verdad , salve a la justicia y alabado sea el Dios de la Sra Lee.
You forget to mention that al Qaeda was created by the CIA to fight against the then-Soviet forces in Afghanistan during the 1980s. Now we have two terrorist groups: al Qaeda and ISIS, both created by CIA/NATO which are alternately being supplied by the U.S. and also fought against by U.S. and proxy forces. What a tangled web, indeed!
The reality is more complex: the CIA, the Saudi GID, and the Pakistani ISI all worked together to finance the anti-Soviet jihad forces in Afghanistan.
Osama bin Laden and his Arab fighters were a key part of that network; but Al Qaeda didn’t really form until the 1990-1991 Gulf War, when the Saudi Royals refused Osama bin Laden’s proposal to use his Arab fighters to defend Saudi borders from Saddam, and instead brought in American troops onto Saudi soil. The founding of Al Qaeda really dates from that point, when Osama bin Laden left Saudi Arabia for Sudan.
The financial network that supported Al Qaeda is really curious, though; this links right back into the Saudi government, Saudi Islamic charities, and the remnants of the CIA’s highly corrupt BCCI:
http://www.ipsnews.net/2007/04/finance-questions-linger-about-bushes-and-bcci/
So basically, your comment is on target but the details are more complicated; Al Qaeda sort of rose from the ashes of the Afghan-Soviet war and Desert Storm, and used the very financial networks (BCCI, etc.) created by the CIA/GID/ISI to support its growth, with the cooperation of Saudi government and business members, who in turn were closely allied to the U.S. government and business interests in oil, banking, and arms. The clusterf*ck of all evil, you could call it.
Indeed there was a film about the BCCI investigation and its collapse starring Naomi Watts and Clive Owen, The International, which is not too bad.
Nice summation and link, photosymbiosis; thank you
I recall watching the BCCI hearings back in 1990 when Robert Gates (pre-CIA Director) said he referred to BCCI as “The Bank of Crooks and Criminals International”.
Maybe now would be the time for The Intercept to tackle the story of how 9/11 was created…..
There is no evidence that the CIA backed bin Laden during the Soviet war. The CIA’s main clients were Afghan Islamists like Hekmatyar and Haqqani.
During the Soviet war in Afghanistan during the 1980s, the CIA had no dealings with “Afghan Arabs” such as bin Laden and had few direct dealings with any of the Afghan mujaheddin. All US aid was funneled through Pakistan’s ISI. Brigadier Mohammad Yousaf, the ISI officer who coordinated Pakistani efforts, explained in his 1992 memoir: “No Americans ever trained or had direct contact with the mujaheddin.”
Likewise, bin Laden’s deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri, had this to say in his own memoir: “The truth that everyone should learn is that the United States did not give one penny in aid to the [Arab] mujaheddin.” Bin Laden’s associate Abu Musab al-Suri also denied it: “It is a big lie that the Afghan Arabs were formed with the backing of the CIA.” (see his book “The Call to Islamic Resistance.”
Also, is there any evidence to the claim that the CIA and NATO created ISIS? This claim seems to have originated with an Iranian blogger, as well as Iran’s Hassan Firouzabadi.
“Likewise, bin Laden’s deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri, had this to say in his own memoir: “The truth that everyone should learn is that the United States did not give one penny in aid to the [Arab] mujaheddin.””
Err… not exactly the most reliable source, is it? I mean, Al Qaeda recruiters don’t want to present themselves as having originated as CIA pawns in Afghanistan, not even if there was a BCCI – GID – ISI cutout.
Funny how neither the neocon/neolib axis in the United States nor the Al Qaeda / ISIS axis in the Arab world wants to admit to their once-intimate connections, isn’t it?
Hey, believe what you want.
Can you disprove Zawahiri’s claims? Or provide hard, documented evidence that al-Qaeda is a CIA creation?
In the meantime, at a 9/11 event in NYC this morning, Mrs. Clinton had to leave the event suddenly and as she was helped into her vehicle she collapsed, her knees buckled and she lost a shoe as she was sped off to her daughter’s apartment. Her shoe was apparently later retrieved:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/09/11/hillary-clinton-has-medical-episode-at-911-ceremony-source-says.html
If we want to put an end to Wars and Deception, We Need a re-investigation on the events of 9/11 urgently. Start by interrogating those low-level such as Zelikov (Head of the sham 9/11 committee); Ny mayor Giuliani and others. The insights that will be gained in this new investigation will change the World, with at the very least, as much as the events themselves changed our World: towards a globalized police state. Zion’s dream toward a NewWorldOrder. ????
Some are immune to the reality that the war in Afghanistan, and the “war” on terror in general, simply make things worse for nearly everyone. Everyone, that is, except for defense and intelligence contractors, and politicians stoking fear of “the enemy.”
The Defense Science Board made clear to Donald Rumsfeld that “war on terror” policy was counter-productive when the latter asked the Board to determine why Muslims would be interested in committing terror against Americans. Among the findings in that Report:
These findings comport with common sense, but there are still those who shriek that the only reason “the left” insists on this reality is because they purportedly “want” to be “anti-American. ” These types are frequently immune to facts. They are the death of many people, both here and “over there.”
Donald Rumsfeld’s definition of “victory” in the War on Terror is telling:
That’s the endless war agenda based on propaganda and lies, in a nutshell. . . and for Donald Rumsfeld and his ilk,
Notice that ISIS/Al Qaeda and the neocons/neolibs both share this view of how to use propaganda and indoctrination to manipulate the masses into supporting their agendas?
The bottom line is understood by the rational Muslim world, however – the United States is bent on maintaining a colonial oversight of the oil-rich countries of the Middle East. The Muslim world will never be happy or accepting about this, other than the handful of dictators allied with Washington and Wall Street who benefit personally from the arrangement.
However, this also explains why the Saudis and Qataris ramped up support for groups like ISIS and Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood in the wake of the Arab Spring pro-democracy protests – their greatest fear is being ejected from power and replaced by a parliamentary system of government, and promoting the most radical unthinking intolerant religious doctrines, i.e. Salafist/Wahhabism with the whole takfiri thing that ISIS embraces, helps them maintain their grip on power. Their greatest enemies are thus well-educated, rational Muslims in their own backyard – i.e., ISIS victims.
Of course, the U.S. government also wants to keep the Gulf Arab dictatorships in power, due to their oil and arms purchases, so the U.S. government generally supports this Saudi agenda (as seen in Libya and Syria), and helped them break the Arab Spring pro-democracy movement. This makes all the talk about “American values” (as seen at the 9/11 memorial speech at the Pentagon, featuring Obama, Ash Carter, JCS General Dunford, etc.) is a load of hypocritical bullshit:
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2012/02/20/commentary/how-the-arab-spring-was-hijacked/
And his ilk includes most Democrats, certainly Hillary Clinton.
Afghanistan:
Maternal mortality rates:
2001: 1600 per 100,000 live births.
2015: 396 per 100,000 live births
World bank
Infant Mortality Rates
2001: 93.4 per 1,000
2015: 66 per 1,000
Lapdog Conclusion: Healthcare got worse in Afghanistan
Education: Gross Enrollment Ratio
2001: 22%
2014: 114%
Education: Female [Unicef]
2001: Approximately 50,000 enrollment
2013: 40% (3.2 Million) Enrollment
Lapdog’s Conclusion: Education got worse in Afghanistan
Press Freedom
2001: “A Country without news or pictures” RSF, September 2000
2016: RSF Index # 120 above Indonesia (130) Venezuela (139), Turkey (151), Russia (148)
Lapdog’s Conclusion: Press Freedom got worse in Afghanistan
Women rights:
2001: Do I really need to elaborate?
2016: 68 seats reserved for women in parliament.
2016: Women in government, law enforcement, military
Lapdog’s Conclusion: It’s harder for women to express themselves now in Afghanistan!
This is the question for the lapdogs:
What would it take for you to accept that healthcare, education, Press Freedom got better in Afghanistan?
Actually, it does not matter. Lapdogs do not care about facts.
I knew you couldn’t do it. More non sequiturs, straw men, and juvenile ad hominems. So, now I revert back to ignoring you.
But for the benefit of other readers, more from the above-cited Report:
“US. policies and actions are increasingly seen by the overwhelming majority of Muslims as a threat to the survival of Islam itself.:
US favorability Pew Research Center 2015:
Palestinian Ter. 2007: 13%, 2015: 26%
Indonesia: 2005 : 38%, 2015: 62%
Lebanon: 2002: 36%, 2015: 39%
Pakistan: 2002: 10%, 2015: 22%
ASDA’A BURSON MARSTELLER ARAB YOUTH SURVEY 2016. (The same survey used in the above article about Iraq)
63% of Young Arabs perceive the US as an ally. In the GCC 85% of young Arabs say the US is an ally
Conclusion: lapdogs do not care about facts.
As I recall however, the only policy suggestion from that report was the need for more vigourous propaganda efforts, certainly not for a change in oil-centric pro-imperial strategy. And the current Rumsfeldian Defense Secretary, Ash Carter, was I believe a member of the Defense Science Board, which like the Defense Policy Board, is a private-public consortium of pro-military spending academics, government officials, and private defense contractors.
Their prescription is something like: “Yes, you’ve got lung cancer, but you’ve got no option but to keep smoking cigarettes.”:
That’s some pathetic nonsense; basically it means they want to produce “viral videos” and use similar stealth marketing strategies in place of traditional PR:
They go on and on in this vein:
That entire report can be summed up as “we’re losing the propaganda war, so we need new propaganda tactics” – not one word about changing the agenda of complete neocolonial control over energy resources across the Muslim world.
Utter PR monkey thinking, is all it is.
Oh yes, absolutely. They wanted us to be able to deny and lie with greater credibility, because what we are nakedly doing is predictably pissing off Muslims. I have no doubt they didn’t anticipate that telling the truth on that score actually compelled the conclusion that what we’ve been doing, and the whole War on Terror notion, is only making more terrorism.
Also, they didn’t have to care too much about revealing cause and effect in 2004. The nation was still largely captive to 9/11 Syndrome and thus not much disposed to considering this reality.
on glance at your flim flam and my guess is – you are a foreign policy junkie looking to substantiate and promote your own industry at the expense of America return on productivity for the benefit of America.
If you are a really “good” person, you would also point out the costs of this BS and how much Americans have suffered for the BS – but hey, want to help them over there? LEAVE AMERICA. BUH-BYE.
ps – if you want to return – return with the billions it cost us.
LOL at this bozo parroting made-up facts sponsored by Washington think-tanks. Yeah, all those non-existant schools you didn’t build filled with phantom students are bound to make people like the USA! Hey no figures on all those US soldiers guarding poppy fields in Afghanistan?
What should the US do?
“Everyone’s worried about stopping terrorism. Well, there’s really an easy way: Stop participating in it.”? Noam Chomsky
Abandon the imperial project and devote those billions in foreign military spending to rebuilding the collapsing US infrastructure and revitalizing the domestic US manufacturing economy, duh. I mean, this is how every Empire in history collapses, you get some corrupt cabal at the top trying to run a global tribute system while their own domestic system collapses around them – the British Empire, the Soviet Empire, all went down this way.
Yes, this means drastic reductions in direct aid to Israel, as well as elimination of support for the Gulf Arab dictatorships, who will be replaced by parliamentary systems; Israel will have to cut cooperation deals with its neighbors and end the Palestinian oppression program; US military bases in the region (and much of the rest of the world) will have to be abandoned.
It’s inevitable, no doubts about that. Preferably sooner, rather than later, as to minimize the domestic collapse.
The U.S. should make some public service announcements about hasbara trolls.
Lol! zuurrrrrrrrrg, fiisssssssssssshh, eeeeeckk…this service announcement is brought to you by the emergency broadcast network, hasbara trolls are propagandizing the American public.
They are lapdogs. Their job is to praise their masters not to provide solutions to problems they don’t even understand.
Both you and hasbara Jack are Israeli loyalists that are undermining the United States of America.
Many of us forget that this is the tactic of the weak. These weak groups can never take or hold American territory like a nation-state.
Those weak groups that use the tactic of “fear” only defeat us if we overreact and reward the tactic of fear.
Unfortunately the United States has been defeated by these weak groups. We rewarded the tactic of fear by destroying our own Bill of Rights and U.S. Constitution. We rewarded that tactic by destroying the “Geneva Conventions” that would may have protected American troops in future conflicts. We rewarded that tactic by destroying Ronald Reagan’s “Convention Against Torture” which includes cruel punishment. We rewarded that tactic by destroying the World War Two legal precedent of the “Nuremberg Defense” which punished Nazi prison guards and created a deterrent against future war crimes saying “just following orders” was NOT a legal defense at all. We destroyed our own “Independent Judiciary” providing judicial review of the political branches.
Young adults today only know a lawless America that tortures, operates gulags and Kangaroo Courts.
15 years later the United States has been totally defeated in this War on a Tactic! We rewarded the tactic of fear by destroying our own Constitution and Bill of Rights. That’s the real State of the Union!
and yet Obama and Clinton still call America that greatest nation etc etc.
Trump is right. He speaks truth to power.
Jill Stein has the right values.
America has become a sewer of sadistic hypocrits who beat the public because it’s the right and profitable thing to do and the victims who are beat less are gratefull they arent beat more and the the ones who are beat more will blindly relish it and ask for more.The colonists would not have let things get this bad.
If you take a look through Robert Fisk’s “The Great War For Civilization” it becomes clear that the U.S. has been militarily and covertly engaged in the Middle East since the end of World War II, particularly after the final collapse of the British Empire (Suez, 1954). So, the current situation is nothing new and can hardly be blamed entirely on 9/11 (although it certainly gave the PNAC neocons a big boost).
Such actions include: the overthrow of Mossadegh in Iran and the emplacement of the Shah, the most savage dictatorship of the late 20th century (says Amnesty International) in the 1950s, the covert support of the Muslim Brotherhood as an anti-Nasser force in Egypt, deep involvement in the Israeli-Arab war of 1973, covert and military roles in Lebanon (which resulted in the truck bombings in Beirut, killing over 300 American and French soldiers), financial and military intelligence roles in the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988), covert roles in the Soviet-Afghan war (1979-1988), the next Gulf War with Iraq (1990-1991), which involved the stationing of American troops for years on Saudi Arabian soil.
As anyone who looks into it will learn, it was the presence of U.S. troops in Saudi Arabia that was the greatest impetus behind the rise of Al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden. U.S. support for Israeli persecution of Palestinians was another major, if secondary factor.
As the 28 (redacted) pages of the 9/11 Report on the Saudis reveal, the 9/11 hijackers received financial and other assistance from elements of the Saudi government, including Saudi intelligence officers (Omar al-Bayoumi, Osama Bassnan, and others) and members of the Saudi Royal family (such as Prince Bandar’s wife).
The Saudi Royals also financed a global network of Wahhabi-Sunni Islamic mosques that adhered to intolerant violent views of Islam, and provided cover and support for Al Qaeda linked terrorists. The Saudi Royals did this to appease the radical religious elements who help keep them in power in Saudi Arabia, who prevent a transition to a more parliamentary-style democratic form of government, as well as to expand Saudi influence around the world.
When Abu Zubaida (senior Al-Qaeda operative) was captured in Pakistan in 2002, he had a collection of phone numbers linked to the Saudi Royal family and institutions they supported in the United States. When U.S. intelligence agents renditioned him to a black site and told them he was in Saudi custody (a trick), he showed relief and gave them a number to call (a Saudi Royal). This all points to extensive Saudi government foreknowledge of and even involvement in the attacks.
However, we must also consider that the Bush Administration, in summer 2001, received numerous warnings about impending hijackings of airlines from diverse sources – FBI field agents, CIA analysts, and foreign intelligence services – yet took no action to prevent those hijackings. This gives some credence to the notion that the Bush Administration felt that domestic terrorist attacks would be good for them politically, as a diversion from the looming Enron scandal and from the Florida vote recount (which showed Gore won), and thus deliberately chose to not warn the airlines or step up security in response to those warnings. Deliberate criminal negligence seems as likely an explanation for the Bush-Cheney-Rice-Rumsfeld actions as gross incompetence, certainly. The close historical ties between the Bush crime family and the House of Saud are of interest here.
Obviously, if Iran had been this deeply involved in the 9/11 attacks, the United States would have used 9/11 as a rationale to attack and invade Iran.
What happened instead was a massive collection of lies and covert actions intended to create a justification for invading Iraq – the anthrax attacks, the lies about Saddam’s WMDs and links to 9/11. The architects of this scam included Dick Cheney & Scooter Libby, George W. Bush & Tony Blair, James Woolsey, Collin Powell & George Tenet, and their Congressional allies like Hillary Clinton (D), John McCain (R). Numerous media outlets and writers piled on as well – Judith Miller (NYTimes) & Ken Pollack (Threatening Storm) are good examples.
As a result of these lies, massive bloodshed took place in Iraq from 2003 onwards – thousands of U.S. soldiers killed an wounded, along with hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians; a grotesque torture program was implemented in 2004 (Rumsfeld & Miller & the CIA) in an attempt to crush the popular anti-occupation insurgency; hundreds of billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars were handed to defense contractors and ‘reconstruction’ contractors, a massive NSA surveillance program was created (and later brought to the United States for domestic surveillance), and sectarian violence was encouraged between Sunni and Shia by the occupiers in an effort to “divide and conquer”, leading to the rise of Al Qaeda and later ISIS.
At the same time, Afghanistan was allowed to fall back into chaos and the Taliban re-established themselves there, as the U.S. was devoting most of its resources to oil-rich Iraq.
I could go on, but that’s enough material to support war crimes charges and transport to the Hague for the architects of the 2003 Iraq War; it also shows that Saudi Arabia is the real sponsor of the 9/11 attacks and should be slapped with sanctions and have all its assets within the United States frozen (as happened to Iran in 1979); the Saudi Royals should be encouraged to step down (the French Riviera could be their new home) and implement a parliamentary system as a condition of lifting those sanctions and unfreezing their assets.
That would be called impartial and fair justice for the 9/11 victims – the House of Saud removed from power and Bush, Cheney and Rumseld (and a selection of their followers) sitting in jail cells for at least a decade each.
The United States State Department also assisted the CIA in getting lots of terrorists visas from Jedda, according to Michael Springmann, who witnessed and reported (to no avail!) the entire, seedy operation:
http://www.salem-news.com/articles/september112012/cia-911-visas-tk.php
Naturally, no Americans will be hearing about any of this on CNN or PBS or any place else today.
Well, that was par for the course, part of the U.S. – Saudi alliance for economic purposes. It doesn’t translate into evidence that those who expedited visas wanted to see terrorist attacks in the United States, however.
What it means is that U.S. government officials have long viewed the alliance with Saudi Arabia as a giant cash cow, just as the Saudi dictatorship views their alliance with the United States as a means of staying in power and preventing the kind of domestic uprisings that would force them, like the the Shah of Iran, to flee the country.
However, the Saudis were also paying off the Al Qaeda fundamentalists and appeasing the radical Wahhabi-Sunni preachers in their own country with large financial donations, again, because if they had the support of these preachers, it would help them stay in power.
Of course, the solution is to have the House of Saud step down from power and be replaced by a parliamentary system of government, including *elections*, which curiously the U.S. media and the U.S. government NEVER discuss, do they? I mean, can you imagine CNN’s Wolf Blitzer interviewing Obama or Clinton and pressing them about why they don’t support a transition to democratic rule in Saudi Arabia?
The other implication, that the Bush crime family and the House of Saud both had extensive foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks and the infiltration of Al Qaeda operatives into the United States, yet allowed them to take place for political reasons, well, that is a touchy topic, isn’t it?
One notion is that they didn’t expect the planes to fly into buildings, but instead anticipated a traditional standoff-on-the-airport-tarmac hostage situation; there is some evidence that many of the hijackers were being closely monitored as they got on their planes. This is the kind of thing that the Bush-Cheney crime gang would think was a good idea, just as with their highly likely involvement in the 9/18 and 10/9 anthrax mailings.
Covert operations that get out of control and cause massive blowback, that’s not uncommon in U.S.-Saudi history; indeed there’s very good evidence that a similar bumbling plot led to the rise of ISIS in Syria. The debacle in Libya, that’s another good example of the law of unintended consequences. Stupid greedy no-talent ass clowns, that’s what these “world leaders” really are.
Actually, when Condi Rice was testifying before Congress related to 9/11 she said (lying): “I don’t think anybody could have predicted that they would try to use an airplane as a missile, a hijacked airplane as a missile.”
On August 6, 2001, the President personally “received a one-and-a-half page briefing advising him that Osama bin Laden was capable of a major strike against the US, and that the plot could include the hijacking of an American airplane.”
In July 2001, the Administration was also told that terrorists had explored using airplanes as missiles. [Source: NBC, 9/10/02; LA Times, 9/27/01]
In the two years prior to 9/11, NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command) conducted exercises simulating what the White House says was unimaginable at the time: hijacked airliners used as weapons to crash into targets and cause mass casualties:
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/2004-04-18-norad_x.htm
Fucking rubbish!!! Where is your source on this?
Fisk’s book should be required reading in the U .S. I recommend it highly to anyone with an interest in the history of U.S. interference in that part of the world. I agree also with your comment on Saudi Arabia. However, as we have learned, that country is a huge donor to the Clinton Foundation and has furthered U.S. ambition for control of the “world island” by being a proxy armed force in the region, much the same as Israel, although for sightly different motives of its own. Thanks for this post.
Israel is not persecuting Palestinians.
Palestinians are oppressing Israelis.
Stabbing Israelis is oppression. Running over Israelis is oppression. Blowing up Israelis in buses is oppression. Launching rockets & mortars at Israelis is oppression. Blowing up pizza restaurants & night clubs & hotels is oppression.
You are a hasbara troll who has spewed those exact claims many, many times, and seen them debunked as often. If you vomit any more of this puke on this board I shall post links and quotes to vile and depraved commentary from Israeli officials, rabbis and teens. If you want even more readers exposed to the foul deeds and words Zionism generates, just continue.
So, the claim that Palestinians are killing Israelis has been “debunked”? Are denying the simple fact that Palestinian rocket and knife attacks are a reality?
i dont think she said that. all you have to do is look at gaza pictures from drones and see the damage and death israel has wrought. i mean its complete eradication. i mean i can understand it, they need to get in on the real estate bubble too.
Actually, both your rationale and timeline are flawed. It was claimed by US intelligence sources that several of the hijackers moved freely through Iran on a course for the US in the run-up to the attacks of 9/11. However, several countries had already been slated for regime change in the months preceding that fateful day. The invasion of Afghanistan was part of a broader foreign policy initiative that had already been devised by the Bush administration in the months leading up to the attacks. This strategy was revealed to the 911 Commission by Condoleezza Rice in sworn testimony. According to that sworn testimony, the decision to invade Afghanistan was reached on 4 Sept 2001, a fullweek before the attacks of 9/11. Much has come out in recent years concerning the long range planning for the invasion of Afghanistan that preceded the WTC attacks of 9/11. For example:
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2001/11/afgh-n20.html
On 12 September 2001, the UN Security Council adopted its Resolution 1368 brought international terrorism into the ambit of Chapter VII of the UN Charter, under which the Security Council could authorize the use of military force “perpetrators, organizers and sponsors of these terrorist attacks.” And on 28 September 2001, Security Council Resolution 1373 was passed for the purpose of compelling member nations to “take the necessary steps to prevent the commission of terrorist acts” and to “cooperate, particularly through bilateral and multilateral arrangements and agreements, to prevent and suppress terrorist attacks and take action against perpetrators of such acts”. So, within just sixteen days of the attacks, the legal justification for the invasion of Afghanistan had been provided by the UN under the pretext that it was harboring the perpetrators of the attack. Although two separate indictments were made against bin Laden by two separate grand juries in 1998 for two separate terrorist acts, no indictment has ever been filed against him for the events of 9/11.
When considering the critical importance of Afghanistan’s physical location relative to the Asian land routes required to carry natural gas from west to east. In 1995, a Turkmenistan–Afghanistan–Pakistan–India Pipeline The U.S. company Unocal, in conjunction with the Saudi oil company Delta, for the purpose of providing Turkmenistan with an independent export route that would be free of both Iranian and Russian interference. Wikipedia reports that “On 21 October 1995, these two companies signed a separate agreement with Turkmenistan’s president Saparmurat Niyazov. In August 1996, the Central Asia Gas Pipeline, Ltd. (CentGas) consortium for construction of a pipeline, led by Unocal, was formed. On 27 October 1997, CentGas was incorporated in formal signing ceremonies in Ashgabat, Turkmenistan, by several international oil companies along with the Government of Turkmenistan.” repeated political disruption of this proposed natural gas pipeline by the Taliban was one of the principle reasons that Afghanistan found itself on top of the list for US regime change in a post-911 world. This does not mean that Iran was not in the cross-hairs of US policy makers as well. Rather, its place lower on the list was governed by many factors including the need for a strong Shiite state on Russia’s southern border which could serve as an ideological counterbalance to Sunni aspirations in the region – much the way that the Muslim brotherhood was used as a counterbalance against CIA sponsored Arab leaders like Nasser.
Say what?
When considering the critical importance of Afghanistan’s physical location relative to the Asian land routes required to carry natural gas from west to east. In 1995, a Turkmenistan–Afghanistan–Pakistan–India Pipeline The U.S. company Unocal, in conjunction with the Saudi oil company Delta, for the purpose of providing Turkmenistan with an independent export route that would be free of both Iranian and Russian interference.
Should have read:
Consider the critical importance of Afghanistan’s physical location relative to the Asian land routes required to carry natural gas from west to east. In 1995, a Turkmenistan–Afghanistan–Pakistan–India Pipeline WAS PROPOSED by the U.S. company Unocal, in conjunction with the Saudi oil company Delta, for the purpose of providing Turkmenistan with an independent export route that would be free of both Iranian and Russian interference.
“It was claimed by US intelligence sources that several of the hijackers moved freely through Iran on a course for the US in the run-up to the attacks of 9/11. However, several countries had already been slated for regime change in the months preceding that fateful day.”
US intelligence sources also claimed that Iraq had WMD’s and have made false claims to justify our attacks on Lybia, Syria, Yemen, ect. The recent attempts to tie Iran to 9/11 is same as it was in previous cases, it is war propaganda that is part of greater push by Neocons and Zionists to start a war with Iran. The misinformation campaign was on full display when they were trying to undermine Obama on the agreement between the P5+1 nations and Iran to ensure that they couldn’t acquire nuclear weapons. The Zionists know that this robs them of their beloved WMD pre-emptive war argument, so they have switched tactics and are now falsely trying to link Iran to 9/11. Most recently the Zionists have been abusing American courts by suing Iran on behalf of their Zionists shills to gain money and judgments against the country. Yet Iran and America don’t have diplomatic relations, so inevitably Iran will loose every case brought against it in American courts due to a lack of representation. American and Israeli Zionists are fully aware of this and are going to use these sham judgments as the basis for their war propaganda in their next push to get US to fight a war with Iran on Israel’s behalf.
From beginning to end, the official narrative stinks. Within hours of the WTC attack, blame had been placed at the feet of al Queda by MSM sources. All of the nineteen hijackers were positively identified even though the flight manifests didn’t have a single name of the accused. When asked how they knew who the hijackers were, government sources said positive identification was determined from DNA samples. How did the government distinguish which body parts belonged to the hijackers without first having a basis for comparison? At least five of the accused hijackers were reported to be alive and living abroad by reputable news sources including BBC shortly after they were named by MSM sources. Although fifteen of the nineteen hijackers did not qualify for visas, high level US state department officials ordered the consulate in Saudi Arabia to approve their visa applications (Michael Springmann, head US consular official in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, later claims that during this period he is “repeatedly ordered… to issue [more than 100] visas to unqualified applicants.” He turns them down, but is repeatedly overruled by superiors. [BBC, 11/6/2001; St. Petersburg Times, 11/25/2001]). This is just the leading edge of the iceberg. Literally hundreds of inconsistencies on the “official” 911 narrative have been discovered and revealed by dedicated researchers. Thus I agree with you when you point out the fact US intelligence sources (and government officials) routinely make up facts for the purpose of affecting very significant outcomes.
Foreknowledge of the attacks was proven by very irregular stock and option trades on companies that would be directly affected by the attacks. The Bloomberg News reported that put options on the airlines surged to the phenomenal high of 285 times their average. Yet the 911 commission determined that, because no known “terrorist organizations” benefited from that trading, the trading itself was not worthy of further consideration. $2.5 million of the put options still remain unclaimed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3xgjxJwedA
It is NOT A WAR ON TERROR. It is IMPERIALISM using terrorism as an excuse to do ANYTHING. With “terrorism” as the reason they can detain at will, target military and civilian personnel, scapegoat political enemies and rival regimes, spy on everyone, poke their noses into everyone’s business, enforce regulations that benefit their strategies on industries such as the airlines to completely monitor all movements of peoples around the world, obtain huge extra financing on top of their normal budgets, act completely off the radar and in secret and call anyone who questions them a terrorist sympathiser. It is a fucking SHAM. STOP CALLING IT A WAR ON TERROR. It never has been never will be. The US armed their “enemies” in Afghanistan, armed their “enemies” in Iraq, and then armed ISIS and set them off on a world jolly to wreak havoc. YOU ARE A FUCKING NEWS SITE, GET WITH WHAT IS REALLY HAPPENING OR GO GET A PROPER JOB LIKE ALL US OTHER POOR CUNTS. This is just more and more bullshit. The USA is acting “exceptionally” in the interests of its corporations, military contractors, and wealthy allies and is now doing whatever it wants with a passive media spin doctoring every step. You look increasingly like a bunch of recently graduated wannabe journos connected to the universe by little more than an email and the internet reporting on whatever you spot under your noses that you have the man-hours to manage to write an article about. Tell us something we don’t know rather than giving us tired verdicts on the state of a play we already know is something else entirely to what you think it is.
Here is the documentary on 9/11 we will NOT be seeing on CNN or any other American television station today or any day:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gETF0_SOXcg
Crap.
If you want a decent documentary on the events leading up to 9/11, the best one I’ve found is Al Jazeera’s In Plain Sight:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nbsr0jWuwZ8
It provides a good basis for understanding everything in those redacted 28 pages, too. Put the two together and you have a very damning picture of the Bush Administration and the House of Saud in relation to 9/11.
Another good source is “Forbidden Truth: U.S. -Taliban Secret Oil Diplomacy and the Failed Hunt for Bin Laden, by Jean-Charles Brisard & Guillaume Dasquie (2002)”
Alexander Cockburn had utter contempt for this shit.
Counterpunch has really gone downhill since Cockburn lost control and then died.
There’s quite a bit of evidence pointing to groups like “The 9/11 Truth Movement” being covert psychological operations financed by PR firms with ties to Bush neocons and Saudi Royals, with the obvious agenda of distracting attention away from Bush/Saudi complicity in the 9/11 attacks, as well as tarring anti-Iraq War activists with the conspiracy theorist brush.
If you look into the state-controlled Saudi press, you find similar efforts, though mostly of the “the Israelis were behind 9/11″ flavor, not “the CIA blew up the World Trade Center” variety – as well as a large pro-Saudi PR effort in the United States coordinated by U.S. PR firms (see for example, the “Saudi women get to vote!” BS that was spewed all across U.S. corporate media, NPR, etc. some months ago).
The best deconstruction of these propaganda conspiracy efforts is by Douglass Rushkoff, 2007:
https://arthurmag.com/2007/09/20/rushkoff-on-911-conspiracy-theorists/
P.S. A good primer on the PR effort involved in using 9/11 as a rationale to invade Iraq in 2003 is “Weapons of Mass Deception” by Rampton & Stauber (who also wrote the excellent “Toxic Sludge is Good For You)
http://www.yesmagazine.org/issues/whose-water/review-weapons-of-mass-deception-the-uses-of-propaganda-in-bushs-war-on-iraq
Some highlights:
Thus, most of the “War on Terror” propaganda is directed at the American public, to whip up support for the larger agenda, control of oil resources and exports across the Muslim world, from North Africa to the Middle East to Central Asia (which Alex Emmons doesn’t even mention in this article!). Supporting client states like Israel and Saudi Arabia is key to this agenda:
and
That’s all from 2002; it clearly shows how U.S. support for Israeli oppression and the Saudi dictatorship, all in the name of controlling the oil, played such a leading role in the growth of radical Islamic terrorism around the world.
https://theintercept.com/2016/09/08/obama-promises-lame-duck-tpp-push-despite-uproar-over-pro-corporate-provisions/?comments=1#comment-279521
Photo, I found this reference to SEATO, from a site you referenced. Thought you might be interested in it. The author seems to think that Obama /Clinton want this in Asia Pacific.
That’s a whole lot of information . . . it would explain the ardent TPP support, an economic agreement (comparable to the EU) as a precursor to a military agreement (comparable to NATO), explaining why Defense Secretary Ash Carter said:
If these are really are his values, than perhaps all those rumors about the Satanic human sacrifice cult in the bowels of the Pentagon are true? What do they get up to when the cameras aren’t rolling, one wonders. . . Or maybe they do really do believe they are humanitarians with good intentions, and all the bloodshed and destruction they create is just an unfortunate accident. Some serious cognitive dissonance would be involved there. . . batshit crazy either way.
Turns out Ash Carter is an Edward Teller physicist type, quantum chromodynamics background, no boots-on-the-ground military experience at all. This explains a lot; that’s perhaps the most psychotic element of the military-industrial complex, the pro-war physicists – Carter being a champion of Star Wars, too, according to this:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/06/25/physicist-for-war-and-profit/
That definitely points to a Hillary Clinton – Barak Obama agenda for a New Cold War.
Israel kills Palestinians in self-defense.
Douggie … like yourself, Cockburn was a gatekeeper for the Zionist political establishment. It’s fairly evident that’s what you are. There’s tons of material on the web supporting an inside job orchestrated by VP Cheney and his (((neocon cabal))). All roads lead to Israel Douggie. The world already knows this to be true, but unfortunately many Americans who have been indoctrinated by the mainstream press can’t see the truth of it.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-911-reader-the-september-11-2001-terror-attacks/5303012
Global Research is an unreliable site for loons. Among the deranged notions they’ve promoted are that Big Pharma forced the FDA to silence pro-homeopathy advocates and suppress the horrors of Western medicine, as well as that genetically modified foods are a conspiracy to sterilize the world’s population. They also think vaccines are some horrible Big Pharma plot. My favorite is: North Korea, a Land of Human Achievement, Love and Joy.
So, if you — a GR fan — think Doug, I and Alexander Cockburn are all “gatekeepers” or whatever else, I really do not care.
Miss Mona, for someone who calls out hasbara trolls you’ve really slipped by lumping yourself with Doug Salzmann and Cockburn. Two hasbara trolls if there ever was. Jeez girl.
Your article only touches the tip of the iceberg. Dating back at least to the 1980’s local police operated blacklists of persons of interest (not meeting the suspect standard) or just blacklisted people they didn’t like. Especially in Bible Belt states, which operate Protestant “theocracies”, maybe not attending the church on Sundays could blacklist an innocent individual.
After 9/11 the federal government used billions of taxpayer dollars to literally “deputize” state and local officials in “Preemption” grants that violated the 4th Amendment rights of their citizens.
The net result was that likely thousands of Americans (conservative estimate) were uploaded onto federal and international terrorist watchlists – having absolutely nothing to do with terrorism or crime – simply people the local good old boy networks disliked. Since the local and state officials were profiting off the “Gravy Train” of federal tax dollars – they essentially wiped out all checks & balances between levels of government – everybody wins except for the innocent blacklistees.
The U.S. Supreme Court then gave a kick to the innocent blacklistees by ruling that: defenseless citizens (and non-citizens) had to prove that they were being spied upon by the most powerful agencies on the planet Earth.
Domestic spying is a lethal practice. Programs and tactics like CoinTelPro and Operation Chaos destroys innocent American’s lives. Domestic spying has never been passive or harmless in American history – from the Alien & Sedition Acts to the Red Scare to 9/11.
There are no hard statistics available about the number of premature deaths due to 9/11 blacklisting (which includes 1980’s era blacklistees). In CoinTelPro style blacklisting many of the crime victims are never aware they under attack, so they can’t report these felony crimes to government watchdog groups. If those statistics were known (of intentional homicide by national security agencies) it would probably dwarf the actual deaths that happened on 9/11.
in the words of international crime boss, b.h. obama, ‘i’m getting very good at killing people.’
ah, the pride of a war criminal. men, women, children delivered not from evil, but by it. ho hum.
white house chefs and servants. brigades of toadies & yesmen. private jet. getaway camp. vacation-mansion on martha’s vineyard. golf with the in-crowd. a life of crime is a good one.
another chicago hoodlum, old scarface himself, was a piker compared to obi-wan-adroni. capone had his rackets. small time stuff. obi has huge criminal enterprises: wall street, big pharma, big agra, and anything else that smells like big money.
meanwhile, the proles suffer what they must.
we only have ourselves to blame. we allow a crime syndicate to govern. we suffer abuse after abuse, but, meekly say: please, sir, can i have some more?
solution: don’t vote. if voting changed anything it would be banned. a vote endorses & promotes a corrupt system, so, in itself, voting is a corrupt act.
power cedes nothing except by demand.
americans in the streets. millions seeking redress to grievances.
alas, that’s the only option left.
Let’s get the quote just right and put it in context.
The above blockquote is from a Huffington Post (I know, but it doesn’t matter here) piece published when Double Down first hit the shelves.
Obama Told Aides He’s ‘Really Good At Killing People,’ New Book ‘Double Down’ Claims
One link per post, or the post goes to TI Limbo.
“War on terror” creates the enemies it is designed to kill
Our “war on terror” policies have only generated more terrorism against Americans, and other Westerners. Our arrogant polices in and toward Muslim nations have been the catalyst for enormous Muslim anger, and a small minority of them resort to what we call “terrorism.” In the immediate wake of 9/11 I was no more receptive to hearing this than most of my fellow Americans, but it is truth that must be faced if we are to stop the insane cycle of war and violence.
A Pew post from this past July states:
This negative view of Americans has consequences. As many here know, in 2004 Donald Rumsfeld commissioned the Defense Science Board to study and determine why Muslims hated us and some wanted to harm us. The conclusion was: Our policies toward Muslims.
Similarly, when Nobel Peace Prize winner, Pakistani Malala Yousafzai, met with Obama in 2013 she declared to him:
This isn’t rocket science. If you bomb wedding parties, maintain killer robots above a people’s heads, depose their popular leaders, prop up their tyrants, arm and support the oppressor locking them in an open air prison, and otherwise meddle in their nations as if you have the fucking right to do so, they are going to be very pissed off at you.
But at home, this meddling (much of it violent) will entail endless benefits. Politicians can rant about the urgent need to fight “the enemy,” and the military industrial complex remains more or less sated. For those interests the “war” on terror that itself keeps the terror going is a huge win.
Or does it create the enemies it was designed to create?
Both.
Oh the billions made off of these horrific invasions etc. Some of the very same war hawks who were architects of Iraq….profit
Obama has been such a huge disappointment in regard to foreign policy. Turned into a killer with no remorse. Shameful. As soon as he picked HRC to be his Secretary of State I knew it was all over, My literally close to a thousand free hours that I put in to see him elected …alas a serious loss for hundreds of thousand in the middle east, I was just one person who put in time to get him elected. When I look at the human lives lost and the immeasurable suffering and destruction in Libya, Syria due to Clinton, Obama decisions all I can say to myself is “shut up all ready” so what you put some time in to get him elected, Who knew we were supporting such a killer who would go along with the war hawks,
Money made off of these wars, http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2013/03/10/10-companies-profiting-most-from-war/1970997/
Paul Wolfowtiz making money off of wars for oil, Israel. Wolfowitz PNAC war pusher and one of the main architects of the invasion. War criminal
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/08/02/the-company-getting-rich-off-of-the-isis-war.html
“Our “war on terror” policies have only generated more terrorism against Americans, and other Westerners. ”
Facts:
1) Most of the islamist terrorist groups have targeted and killed Muslims. They have rarely killed Americans or other Westerners since 9/11. European Muslims were already going to Syria/Iraq to join ISIS even when European governments refused to bomb Syria.
2) Greece (63%), Australia (68%), Canada (53%), UK (57%), Spain (55%) France (48%). These are the percentage of people who believe that Americans are violent as of June 29, 2016 Pew Research Center. Most of those countries have been doing the same thing that the US does in the Middle East. The Pew Poll numbers do not explain CAUSATION. You, as a lapdog, would explain the causes as you wish without even asking the individuals why they have those views.
3) US Favorability Pew Research 2015
Palestinian Ter. 2007: 13%, 2015: 26%
Indonesia: 2005 : 38%, 2015: 62%
Lebanon: 2002: 36%, 2015: 39%
Pakistan: 2002: 10%, 2015: 22%
Russia: 2002 61%, 2015: 15%
Again these are just numbers. Pew does not explain the causes. The US never bombed Russia, but since 9 / 11 it has provided weapons and diplomatic support to Israel. However, US favorability is better in the Palestinian Ter than in Russia.
4) Malala was giving her opinion. She was not providing any data that proved a direct correlation between the number of drone attacks and the number of terrorist attacks. (Hint: Shia Muslims who have been targeted and killed by hundreds in Pakistan have nothing to do with drone strikes).
5) That is not a debate. I just expose your inability to comprehend statistical data. Now, call me a troll as an expression of your frustration.
None of that fallacious crap merits a substantive reply. But I do note you are mute about this. What inanity can you contrive to avoid that?
Be warned: If you desire my attention your replies have to be substantive and responsive to the points I make. The above is not acceptable. I can and will revert to ignoring you if you don’t stay on point.
1) You cannot ignore anybody who proves you are a lapdog. YOU HAVE NO SELF CONTROL.
2) You are deranged. You have been following me like a puppy and you sincerely believe I desire your attention.
Conclusion: you are a lapdog.
I don’t know about Mona and your problem, but she certainly has her argument correct. Statistics, like you say, do not prove causation. As such I would like your opinion as to why the numbers show an upward trend in the Muslim countries you mentioned. also, before commenting on the Pew numbers, I would be interested in the details of their poll, especially how they framed their questions.
“I don’t know about Mona and your problem”
Just wait a few minutes. The moment you challenge him on any of his arguments, he become upset like a 7 year old and will call you a lapdog. He’s defensive this way because he knows his arguments will be torn apart. Generally speaking, after asking for any evidence or proof of his claim or links or other backup as you suggest, will only bring on his childish wrath.
He’ll simply tell you to ‘do your own homework’. He likes to put the responsibility of his unsupported claims onto his opponent. You can get a general flavor of his style by reviewing any of the comment sections of the articles.
Good luck.
“I don’t know about Mona and your problem, but she certainly has her argument correct. ”
That specific argument must be based on facts to be correct. Do we agree with that?
The Defense Board Report was in 2004 during the peak of the Iraqi war. We are in 2016.
For instance, this is what the report stated:
“IN THE EYES OF MUSLIMS, American occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq has not led to democracy there, but only more chaos and suffering”
This is what the Afghans think about US troops in their country as of January 2010
1) 7 in 10 Afghans support the presence of US forces in their country and 61 % favor the military buildup. Nearly seven in 10 Afghans think their country is headed in the right direction. ( CBS News-AP January, 11 2010)
Is it a correct argument to state that the war in Aghanistan made things worse for EVERYONE while most Afghans support US troops and believe their country is going in the right direction?
2) My opinion? Again this is my opinion. Pew did not ask them why they see US more favorable now. Most Muslims do understand that these terrorist groups are more interested about killing them than killing Americans or other Westerners. They might not like the US but I doubt they have a problem with US bombs dropping on ISIS fighters.
3) These polls are available at pew research.org and arabyouthsurvey.com.
You can review the details. The author used the last survey from arabyouth to report 90% of young Iraqis consider the US as the enemy. According to that same survey 63% of Young Arabs consider the US as an ally and 85% of young Arabs in the GCC say the US is an ally. These are important data that help have a better perspective about the situation in 2016. The author will never mention them as he is more interested in proving himself and his lapdogs that America is probably the most hated country on earth.
4) I do not have a problem with Mona or anybody here. Mona and many TI supporters call nearly everybody who challenge them trolls, Zionists, liars…and request TI to ban them. They will even invent stories about those who challenge them so they can have them ban. She even stated I wanted to harm her in the real world! Such behavior proves that they are incapable of having their own arguments, so they just follow what TI writers say. It is just a comedy show.
I REALLY hope you’re getting paid well by your zionist masters to post this tripe – I’d hate it if you really were THAT stupid to believe the drivel you’re paid to post!
Mani just because you get a boner every time you fondle your lapdog, doesn’t mean you should label everyone else a lapdog and get yourself excited over your perverted delusions of impaling them.
And we have created a new enemy, Russia, without even having to bomb them!
Money saved thusly can be used somewhere else, perhaps in a Southern Front in Africa.
“If a nation expects to ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.” — Thomas Jeffferson
Three part article on Senate Torture inquiry in The Guardian by Spencer Ackerman. The first 2 parts have been published.
The new information comes from Daniel Jones, the democratic staff member, who spend 6 years working on the report including reading millions of pages and being the principal author of the 6,700 page final report. A story about CIA attempting to bury their torture efforts and a cliff hanger at the end of the second article as CIA tried to suppress the report and the Obama administration came to the aid of the CIA to slow walk it so that the new republican majority could kill the publication of the report after they retook the senate.
This is probably the only time in my life that I can recall that Dianne Feinstein did good work.
Here is the link to the second part of the three part article. The third part has yet to be published.
‘A constitutional crisis': the CIA turns on the Senate: Tensions flare between the CIA and the Senate in the fight to release the report on torture – leading the agency to spy on its own legislative overseers
Imagine seven years of researching, writing,editing and fighting censorship to produce a 6700 page tome that nobody can read and that the rare copies are being “accidently” destroyed.
But that is all water up the nostrils. I am more worried about who is watching over the CIA’s “Life Sciences and Biotechnology R&D” programs(MK-ULTRA)
Section 807. Advances in life sciences and biotechnology
The Committee recognizes the rapid advancements in the life
sciences and biotechnology and firmly believes that biology in
the twenty-first century will transform the world as physics
did in the twentieth century.
The potential risks associated with these advancements are
less clear. The posture of the Intelligence Community to follow
and predict this rapidly changing landscape is a matter of
concern recognizing the global diffusion and dual-use nature of
life sciences and biotechnology along with the dispersed
responsibility of the life sciences related issues across
several National Intelligence Officer portfolios.
Section 807 requires the Director of National Intelligence
to brief the congressional intelligence committees on a
proposed plan and actions to monitor advances in life sciences
and biotechnology to be carried out by the Director. The
Director’s plan should include, first, a description of the
Intelligence Community’s approach to leverage the organic life
science and biotechnology expertise both within and outside the
Intelligence Community; second, an assessment of the current
life sciences and biotechnology portfolio, the risks of genetic
editing technologies, and the implications of these advances on
future biodefense requirements; and, third, an analysis of
organizational requirements and responsibilities to include
potentially creating new positions. Section 807 further
requires the Director to submit a written report and provide a
briefing to the congressional intelligence committees on the
role of the Intelligence Community in the event of a biological
attack, including a technical capabilities assessment to
address potential unknown pathogens.
I wonder how much Director Clapper will feel The Committee needs to know.
Let’s talk about your slow walking bs, like intentionally impeding all other suggested investigations to take 7 years producing a report NOT released to the public under separation of powers – due to objections by the perpetraitors and an Executive Department of Justice you as a Senator specifically also enabled obstructing everything possible.
http://www.democracynow.org/2007/11/6/a_vote_for_mukasey_is_a_vote_for_torture
Take your “did good work” and shove it where the sun don’t shine.
Is “did good work” a euphemism for inserting pureed food into their rectums while claiming it was necessary for delivering nutrients?
No, I think it’s those forced nutrient insertions through the nose she apparently approves of that are still occurring at Guantanamo.
I’m sorry, that was harsh when my anger’s with what appears a completely corrupt and complicit Senator – not with you.
Recommends checking this http://www.intelligence.senate.gov/publications/report-accompany-s-3017-intelligence-authorization-act-fiscal-year-2017-june-15-2016 out after you read the 3 part Senate Torture Inquiry.
Senator Wyden opinion at the end is interesting. I’d like to know what is in the classified annex but I guess we have to trust our Government to do all that is for the best in this best of the best of all possible worlds.
“guess we have to trust our Government”
:)
Great summary of a human disaster that the U.S. has created in so many ways. Leaving the larger question…just who are the terrorist? U.S. Al Qeada, Isis? Or all of the above?
Even though it is said that those who have died in Iraq, Libya, Syria as a direct consequence of U.S. invasions, etc, It would be a great piece focused on just what is know about the cumulative death and injury toll are in those countries.
When the Lancet report came out in 2006 reporting that 65O,OOO Iraqi people had all ready been killed as a result of the Bush administrations invasion, That report was quickly brushed off and basically discarded.
At a point in time that a drone can see a fly on a camel’s ass, one would think those people killed as a result of U.S. etc war crimes could be counted.
In forty years will a U.S. President visit Syria as Obama just did in Laos and acknowledge the cataclysmic death and destruction that the U.S. is causing now?
What is the death toll now?
Here are even more in these video clips.
SEPTEMBER 10, 2001 Defense Business Practices
Secretary Rumsfeld and other officials talked with reporters about the need to refine the Defense Department’s business practices.?An opening ceremony will kick off Acquisition and Logistics Excellence Week.?They answered questions from members of the media
http://www.c-span.org/video/?165947-1/defense-business-practices
2.3 TRillion Dollars Missing from DOD Day before 9/11/ 2001
https://youtu.be/HsggT9hD0Q8
Here are even more in these video clips.
SEPTEMBER 10, 2001 Defense Business Practices
Secretary Rumsfeld and other officials talked with reporters about the need to refine the Defense Department’s business practices.?An opening ceremony will kick off Acquisition and Logistics Excellence Week.?They answered questions from members of the media
http://www.c-span.org/video/?165947-1/defense-business-practices
2.3 TRillion Dollars Missing from DOD Day before 9/11/ 2001
https://youtu.be/HsggT9hD0Q8
Oh boy, yet another story on the never ending wars of profit, all planned well before 9/11/2001. Meanwhile the Standing Rock Sioux tribe resists the destruction of their tribal lands. Hundreds protest and momentum looks to be building, but the Intercept seems to be blind. I dare say that the MSM will say nothing about this crime as it happens in North Dakota. I guess we can expect more violence and continued violations of treaty rights, human rights, and the defiling of water aquifers and the environment and it is all for profit. But the MSM will say nothing and the Intercept seems to mimic the MSM.
If you have time for a 700 page novel, I recommend Barkskins by Annie Proulx, about the rape of both tribal lands and the North American forests from the 1690s to the present time.
The Intercept’s Alleen Brown & Lee Fang are the only writers who have covered oil & pipeline issues; maybe they should tackle it? A search shows that Alleen Brown’s Twitter feed is Dakota-pipeline heavy, for example. The lack of coverage of a major domestic story like this is indeed curious.
There are a lot of players in that game – the owners of the North Dakota oilfields, the interests involved in transporting the oil to refineries (BNSF and the Energy Transfer Partners coalition, including Phillips66 – and Warren Buffet’s Berkshire-Hathaway is a major holder in both BNSF and Phillips66), those who want to move the oil overseas to pump up domestic prices, etc.
My feeling is that the major Warren Buffet involvement in the transport and marketing of Bakken oil, be it the BNSF “bomb trains” or the the Dakota Access Pipeline destroying farmland and Native American lands, makes this a touchy topic for much of the media in the United States.
Regardless, here’s one of the better sites for following the Dakota pipeline story (Canadian site):
http://www.desmogblog.com/2016/09/08/dakota-access-pipeline-big-oil-nationwide-permit-12
(Note, that’s by Steve Horn, who wrote a fracking story about Clinton’s Energy Initiative with Lee Fang on the Intercept in May 2016)
Most of the Intercept’s foreign policy coverage, though, seems to carefully avoid mentioning the role of oil/gas interests in U.S. foreign policy in Syria, Libya, Iraq, and Afghanistan (let alone Ukraine, Georgia, etc.), for whatever reason.
I mean, notice how this article by Alex Emmons doesn’t even mention the primary economic agenda behind the War on Terror, i.e. control of regional oil resources from North Africa to the Middle East to Central Asia? That’s a very common Intercept trend these days in War on Terror reporting, be it Syria, Libya, or Afghanistan. Go figure. Editorial decision? Owner’s bias? Lack of understanding? Clueless journalism? Take your pick.
“One poll from 2016 found that more than 90 percent of young people in Iraq now consider the United States an “enemy” of their country.”
1) The sample for Iraq was in Bagdad, Irbil and Basrah. These are areas that were badly affected by violence during the occupation. Would the result be the same in Kurdish areas?
2) According to the same survey 70% of young Arabs perceive Saudi Arabia, the country directly involved in bombing Yemen as an ally. 63% perceive the US as an ally.
3) US favorability Pew Global
Palestinian terr. 2007: 13%, 2015: 26%
Indonesia 2005: 38%, 2015: 62%
Pakistan 2002: 10%, 2015: 22%
Philippines 2002 90%, 2015: 92%
These are predominently Muslim ( except Philippines) some of them have US troops on their soil conducting the War on Terror.
January 11, 2016 U.S. Dropped 23,144 Bombs On Muslim-Majority Countries In 2015
Nobel Peace Prize-winner President Obama dropped a serious amount of ordnance last year.
Council of Foreign Relations resident skeptic Micah Zenko recently tallied up how many bombs the United States has dropped on other countries and the results are as depressing as one would think. Zenko figured that since Jan. 1, 2015, the U.S. has dropped around 23,144 bombs on Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia, all countries that are majority Muslim.
http://www.mintpressnews.com/u-s-dropped-23144-bombs-on-muslim-majority-countries-in-2015/212638/
May 25, 2014 FDNY 9/11 Survivor Witness and Whistleblower Speaks on WTC 7
Listen very carefully starting at the ’20’ second mark! As a firefighter on 9/11, he was at Ground Zero and was there when Building 7 came down.
https://youtu.be/ePPdUUISQOs?list=UUhwwoeOZ3EJPobW83dgQfAg
Nonsense.
Trutherism should be listed in the DSM.
Who are you trying to protectDouggie? And Douggie, how does a commercial airplane smash into the Pentagon and leave no debris? AND leave a 16 foot ‘exit hole’ three-rings in?
Ahh, Douggie, everyone [with a brain] knows VP Cheney and his (((neocon cabal)) orchestrated 9-11. Stop bu11shitting yourself man.
Christopher Bollyn’s research says all roads lead to Israel. AND HE’S CORRECT.
Sep 5, 2016 9/11 Suspects: Rudy Giuliani
Mayor Giuliani oversaw the illegal destruction of the 9/11 crime scene and is criminally liable for the deaths of hundreds of emergency workers for not passing on prior warnings about the collapses of the Twin Towers. It is no wonder, then, that the Fire Department of New York so passionately detest Giuliani for his actions in disgracing their fallen brothers and covering up the 9/11 crime.
https://youtu.be/Cl85JSvDmsA
Utter nonsense.
See above.
Sep 11, 2013 9/11 In A Nutshell as James Corbett presents this 5 minute parody of the official conspiracy theory of 9/11
https://youtu.be/vrJiKbK0tVM
September 11, 2013 Twelve Years of War, Lies and Deception
Twelve years after the 9/11 attacks, no credible independent investigation has been done to find out what really happened on that day and who was responsible. Independent journalists and researchers have demonstrated, however, that the official version of the event is nothing but a cover-up, an opinion shared by the co-chairs of the 9/11 Commission, Thomas H. Kean and Lee H. Hamilton, who declared the Commission was “set up to fail”.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/911-twelve-years-of-war-lies-and-deception/5349347
AND the U.S. continues to fund and support Israel and the West Bank and Gaza Strip Death Camps; continues to fund the Egyptian Military Death Machine, er…”Democracy” and continues to fund and arm the despots Worldwide that have been creating the conditions for terrorism since WW II. Oh, speaking of which, the $600 Billion/Yr. DOD has YET to win ONE SINGLE major engagement since WWII – what exactly are they for again? Ooops. Forgot Grenada- thanks for taking on that Luxury Hotel, guys- never forget. Heroes. blahblahblahblah… These Buttocks Never Run…
Never in my wildest imagination as a Vietnam veteran did I think our country would commit a foreign policy debacle that would eventually rival the war I saw as a naive, young medical corpsman in Vietnam ( 31 May 1967 – 31 May 1968 ). But the War on Terror, in its second decade and with no end in sight, now seems to have even surpassed the Vietnam War as a disaster of epic proportions. We are living through an Orwellian era of perpetual war for perpetual peace that would have even surprised George Orwell if he were still alive. This global war will continue to be prosecuted for decades and it has spread throughout the world like a resistant strain of an uncontrollable virus in a global contagion. It is the decadent endgame of our military empire, and I agree with the late Chalmers Johnson that the empire will implode as the Twin Towers did on September 11, 2001, from its own internal contradictions.
“In Afghanistan, the Taliban now holds more territory than it has at any point since 2001.”
1) Most of these territories are in rural areas. According to that same report the territorial gain may be due to redeployment of Afghan forces from low priority areas to high priority areas
2) 2.5 million people under the control of insurgents or at risk to be under the control of insurgents. That means 92% of the Afghan population are under government control.
Another comedy show. The author obviously hopes that things get worse for Afghanistan so he can justify his anti western views.
After 15 years, the only winners in the War on Terror have been the contractors.”
1) Afghanistan:
Maternal mortality rates:
2001: 1600 per 100,000 live births.
2015: 396 per 100,000 live births
World bank
Infant Mortality Rates
2001: 93.4 per 1,000
2015: 66 per 1,000
Education: Gross Enrollment Ratio
2001: 22%
2014: 114%
Education: Female [Unicef]
2001: Approximately 50,000 enrollment
2013: 40% (3.2 Million) Enrollment
Press Freedom
2001: “A Country without news or pictures” RSF, September 2000
2016: RSF Index # 120 above Indonesia (130) Venezuela (139), Turkey (151), Russia (148)
Women rights:
2001: Do I really need to elaborate?
2016: 68 seats reserved for women in parliament.
It seems like you are presenting these facts as evidence that these wars have somehow helped people but this presentation lacks context. Take infant mortality in Afghanistan for example. The rate was already declining quickly. In 1990 it was 120 per 1,000. Mentioning the maternal mortality rate decline is a particularly embarrassing point because in comparison the US is one of very countries where the the rate is actually increasing. The US militaristic priority in spending hasn’t helped domestic women. Imagine if those trillions of dollars went to domestic health care, education and infrastructure projects like building up public health care.
The original article is a super summary but failed to mention the suffering of civilians. Ordinary people have been maimed and killed. Their houses and livelihoods destroyed. Children have grown up terrorized by violence and the constant threat of drone strikes. Their environment has been filled with noxious and toxic pollution.
Yes, because of the War on Terror, women in Afghanistan are now so much freer that they can now choose to wear the burkini and the hijab at their own volition.
Hopefully, these freedoms will spread to the women in Saudi Arabia and France soon.
The article and my comments have nothing to with how Muslim women are treated in Saudi Arabia, France , Brazil. …
The questions are simple:
Was life better for women in Afghanistan in 2001? Did they have better access to Education? Better access to healthcare? Greater Freedom of assembly or speech? Better political representation?
These are not complicated questions at all. Whether Madeleine Albright dropped a H bomb in Iraq and killed half of its population is completely irrelevant to these simple questions.
I admire your positive thinking.
You’d look at a huge mountain of poop and point out the beautiful patterns in it.
At some point I really thought you were not part of the lapdog community. Obviously, you are a proud member of it as 3.2 Million girls going to school is described as “poop”.
I thought the reason for the U.S. invasion and occupation of Afghanistan in 2001 was to capture Osama bin Laden?:
President Obama at West Point:
“We did not ask for this fight. On September 11, 2001, nineteen men hijacked four airplanes and used them to murder nearly 3,000 people. They struck at our military and economic nerve centers. They took the lives of innocent men, women and children without regard to their faith or race or station.… As we know, these men belonged to al Qaeda a group of extremists who have distorted and defiled Islam.… After the Taliban refused to turn over Osama bin Laden — we sent our troops into Afghanistan.”
We did not go into Afghanistan with the objective of building schools for Afghan girls and women or to assure women of safe childbirths (although I support the fact that these girls and women’s lives have been vastly improved).
Since news reports at the time (even Bhutto admitted this in an interview) said Osama bin Laden died of renal failure in the fall of 2001, the United States “kept looking for him” until they “found” him in Pakistan and “killed” him and “buried him at sea!” in 2011!
It appears the United States decided to do lots of “nation building” in Afghanistan (so long as we were there anyhow) and also took advantage of all those lovely poppies the Taliban had managed to obliterate by 2001 (just look at this graph):
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-spoils-of-war-afghanistan-s-multibillion-dollar-heroin-trade/91
The only solution to stopping the “Global War on Terror” is for the U.S. government to tell the TRUTH to the world regarding EVERYTHING that has been secreted away including the truth about the assassination of JFK and the events of 9/11.
It is obvious to any average 8th grader who is presented with the “official” stories compared to the extensive research that has been actually conducted by various engineers, physicists, architects and others to find the TRUTH about these events (and many other crimes) that we are all being LIED TO on a daily basis by our own government and the MSM.
Talk about travesties of justice. Especially considering the MILLIONS of human beings who have been murdered and maimed by U.S. weapons.
As if all the destruction and death isn’t bad enough, the U.S. has a hand at peddling heroin to the world as well.
Incredible.
But, Mani, the women of Afghanistan won’t be truly liberated until they are forced to work in strip clubs and star in porno films to make a living wage. Then and only then will I wave the red-white-and-blue and declare victory in Afghanistan.
That’s weird. I don’t see Russians, Vietnamese waving red white and blue although their cities are packed with strip clubs. Anyway dude keep your sexual life for yourself.
Wikipedia:
So the maximum is 1 or 100%. You have 114%. I suspect that all your numbers are equally meaningless, but it is not worth the trouble to chase then down.
Gross Enrollment Ratio is the total enrollment in primary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the population of official primary education age. Gross Enrollment Ratio CAN EXCEED 100% due to the inclusion of over aged and under aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.
This is the definition from the World Bank and it is strikingly similar to the one taught in high schools around the world.
Like the author you hope the numbers were meaningless but they are from data.worldbank dot org.
Do you need help to go to that website?
Fuck you , Mani. It simply defies any reasonable belief that they have every child, boy and girl, and including enough from outside the defined age group, to drive it over 100%.
He’s thoroughly dishonest in nearly every way. He “quotes” people here — e.g., Pedinska, but also many others — saying things they simply did not. An example of his mendacity and MO are in this old sub-thread. Micharacterizing what people say is his relentless shtick.
Myself, I think it’s best to starve him of oxygen. To please other readers who wanted it, I began ignoring him in one of Glenn’s last threads and that made the commenting experience better for all, including me.
In the lapdog community “dishonest” means factually correct. That is why you are so entertaining!
Perfect representation of a lapdog. He has absolutely no understanding of the data, but he honestly believes he is right.
Good entertainment indeed!
Some of those figures may have been a bit inflated:
“Over and over, the United States has touted education — for which it has spent more than $1 billion — as one of its premier successes in Afghanistan.
. . .But a BuzzFeed News investigation [Ghost Students, Ghost Teachers, Ghost Schools, Jul. 8, 2015] — the first comprehensive journalistic reckoning, based on visits to schools across the country, internal U.S. and Afghan databases and documents, and more than 150 interviews — has found those claims to be massively exaggerated, riddled with ghost schools, teachers, and students that exist only on paper. The American effort to educate Afghanistan’s children was hollowed out by corruption and by short-term political and military goals that, time and again, took precedence over building a viable school system. And the U.S. government has known for years that it has been peddling hype.
BuzzFeed News exclusively acquired the GPS coordinates and contractor information for every school that the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) claims to have refurbished or built since 2002, as well as Department of Defense records of school constructions funded by the U.S. military.
BuzzFeed News spot-checked more than 50 American-funded schools across seven Afghan provinces [and found that:]
. . .At least a tenth of the schools BuzzFeed News visited no longer exist, are not operating, or were never built in the first place.
. . .At the schools that were still running, BuzzFeed News found far fewer students than were officially recorded as enrolled. Girls, whom the U.S. particularly wanted to draw into formal schooling, were overcomunted in official records by about 40%.
. . .This year, BuzzFeed News found that the overwhelming majority of the more than 50 U.S.-funded schools it visited resemble abandoned buildings — marred by collapsing roofs, shattered glass, boarded-up windows, protruding electrical wires, decaying doors, or other structural defects. At least a quarter of the schools BuzzFeed News visited do not have running water.
. . .By obtaining internal records from the Afghan Ministry of Education, never before made public, BuzzFeed News also learned that more than 1,100 schools that the ministry publicly reported as active in 2011 were in fact not operating at all. Provincial documents show that teacher salaries — largely paid for with U.S. funds — continued to pour into ghost schools.”
Afghan Schools: Is The Success Story Exaggerated? – NPR, June 18, 2015:
. . .In a letter released Thursday, John Sopko, the U.S. special inspector general for Afghanistan reconstruction, said top Afghan education officials recently claimed that their predecessors had inflated the number of students, teachers and schools.
Sopko did not say by how much he thought the figures might be exaggerated. But he was quoted last month as saying that the Afghan education system “counts absent students as ‘enrolled’ for up to three years before dropping them from the rolls.”
He said 1.55 million “absent” students were included as part of the overall student total last year.
“The [education] ministers reported that there are no active schools in insecure parts of the country, and that former officials doctored statistics, embezzled money, and interfered with university entrance exams,” Sopko wrote.
“These allegations suggest that U.S. and other donors may have paid for schools that students do not attend and for the salaries of teachers who do not teach,” Sopko added in a letter seeking more information from the U.S. Agency for International Development, the conduit for U.S. aid to the Afghan education system.
Huh, I didn’t know about all that absurd hyping, but it certainly doesn’t surprise me. Thanks, Doc.
School enrollment
2001: 1.2 million
2013: Approximately 8 million
Minus maximum numbers due to false report
2 million
Net:
6 million .
Even if we remove the values due to exaggerated data and fake reports Afghanistan still ends up with approximately 6 million kids going to schools as of 2013. We are not even talking about higher education.
The statement that only contractors are winners in the War on Terror is not only ignorant and false, it is also dishonest. This is the author and the lapdogs hope. They want Afghanistan to fail to facilitate their anti western views.
Not that enjoy defending Mani, but here is why Gross Enrollment ratio might be above 100%
“Gross enrollment ratio, primary, both sexes (%)
Total enrollment in primary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the population of official primary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.”
http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.PRM.ENRR
But hey, at least he’s using actual facts from a real website. Points given for using actual data.
1) I do not need your defense. Any high school kid could figure that one out.
2) You need to check your inability to search and comprehend data yourself before “defending” others. You are as stupid as Sulzer as far as I am concerned
Mani ” some impeachable offenses may not even be a crime”
Galactus ” this is the most stoopidest statement”
Any High School kid
I guess that’s why you overlooked posting the readily available link. It’s because you haven’t yet reached high school.
Good going, Stoopid.
He almost never does. Usually he doesn’t even cite a source. He mischaracterizes the sources he does provide, just as he mischaracterizes the words of those here whom he disagrees with when he “quotes” them.
Tellingly, he has nothing to say about my posts supplying evidence that the war on terror causes terror, as has U.S. policy for decades. Including my direct quotes from the Defense Science Board Report. (Not that I’d likely reply to the troll even if he did spew some shit about those posts.)
Mani to Sulzer
” Like the author you hope the numbers were meaningless but they are from data.worldbank dot org.”
Again, what makes you so entertaining is your strong belief that others are stupid, and you are smart.
i do not think yo are stupid enough to believe those numbers; they just imply what you want.
When could you get over 100%? Perhaps if you had a really good school system in a region that suffered a severe calamity, shutting down the school for a few years. Then during the recovery phase you would have a lot of students in primary school that should have already passed through. There is no way you could create new schools across a whole country fast enough for that to happen in a place as badly off as Afghanistan.
Dude, get in touch with your high school Math teacher.
You need to do better when you are shown to be wrong.
In any case, my high school math teachers are long gone. Even those from whom I learned the statistics in information theory when getting my Phd in EE are also into very late retirement.
I would not brag about a Phd if I was you. You moved from being stupid to being pathetic!
And I have no doubt that you seriously believe that you are right.
You might as well have just posted http://www.google.com you nitwit.
Some of those figures may have been a bit inflated:
“Over and over, the United States has touted education — for which it has spent more than $1 billion — as one of its premier successes in Afghanistan.
. . .But a BuzzFeed News investigation — the first comprehensive journalistic reckoning, based on visits to schools across the country, internal U.S. and Afghan databases and documents, and more than 150 interviews — has found those claims to be massively exaggerated, riddled with ghost schools, teachers, and students that exist only on paper. The American effort to educate Afghanistan’s children was hollowed out by corruption and by short-term political and military goals that, time and again, took precedence over building a viable school system. And the U.S. government has known for years that it has been peddling hype.
BuzzFeed News exclusively acquired the GPS coordinates and contractor information for every school that the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) claims to have refurbished or built since 2002, as well as Department of Defense records of school constructions funded by the U.S. military.
BuzzFeed News spot-checked more than 50 American-funded schools across seven Afghan provinces [and found that:]
. . .At least a tenth of the schools BuzzFeed News visited no longer exist, are not operating, or were never built in the first place.
. . .At the schools that were still running, BuzzFeed News found far fewer students than were officially recorded as enrolled. Girls, whom the U.S. particularly wanted to draw into formal schooling, were overcomunted in official records by about 40%.
. . .This year, BuzzFeed News found that the overwhelming majority of the more than 50 U.S.-funded schools it visited resemble abandoned buildings — marred by collapsing roofs, shattered glass, boarded-up windows, protruding electrical wires, decaying doors, or other structural defects. At least a quarter of the schools BuzzFeed News visited do not have running water.
. . .By obtaining internal records from the Afghan Ministry of Education, never before made public, BuzzFeed News also learned that more than 1,100 schools that the ministry publicly reported as active in 2011 were in fact not operating at all. Provincial documents show that teacher salaries — largely paid for with U.S. funds — continued to pour into ghost schools.”
Afghan Schools: Is The Success Story Exaggerated? – NPR, June 18, 2015:
. . .In a letter released Thursday, John Sopko, the U.S. special inspector general for Afghanistan reconstruction, said top Afghan education officials recently claimed that their predecessors had inflated the number of students, teachers and schools.
Sopko did not say by how much he thought the figures might be exaggerated. But he was quoted last month as saying that the Afghan education system “counts absent students as ‘enrolled’ for up to three years before dropping them from the rolls.”
He said 1.55 million “absent” students were included as part of the overall student total last year.
“The [education] ministers reported that there are no active schools in insecure parts of the country, and that former officials doctored statistics, embezzled money, and interfered with university entrance exams,” Sopko wrote.
“These allegations suggest that U.S. and other donors may have paid for schools that students do not attend and for the salaries of teachers who do not teach,” Sopko added in a letter seeking more information from the U.S. Agency for International Development, the conduit for U.S. aid to the Afghan education system.
There was endless, insane and failed war for at least 30 years before 9/11. And coincidentally, corrupt law enforcement agencies have always employed science defying explanations as an excuse for that war, too. It, not terror, actually conditioned the world to accept endless war, and even to waging it against the people of their own countries. It didn’t use all the typical weapons of war – but it certainly adopted its lingo.
Congress, the DEA and the FDA still embrace lies to perpetuate their phony war on drugs.
What can I say. if OBL did it, he defeated US on that day by murdering about three thousands people and enable neocons to fulfill their wet dream of destroying US economy, jobs and collapse even more standard of living for 99% via six trillion dollar war taxpayer bill for MIC and surveillance state thanks to Brzezinsky and a gang.
One way or another whatever it was since it remains to be truly investigated, 9/11 epitomizes utter failure of the US government to represent interest of its citizen rendering itself illegitimate usurper of our sovereign power. and hence must be disposed of as such.
As usual in the history, the very lives of thousands american or millions of Arabs and others are treated just as pawns on the inhumane game of thrones among disgusting oligarchs and their political stooges.
“After 15 years, the only winners in the War on Terror have been the contractors.”
1) Afghanistan:
Maternal mortality rates:
2001: 1600 per 100,000 live births.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15752530
2015: 396 per 100,000 live births
http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.STA.MMRT
Infant Mortality Rates
2001: 93.4 per 1,000
2015: 66 per 1,000
Education: Gross Enrollment Ratio
2001: 22%
2014: 114%
Education: Female [Unicef]
2001: Approximately 50,000 enrollment
2013: 40% (3.2 Million) Enrollment
Press Freedom
2001: “A Country without news or pictures” RSF, September 2000
2016: RSF Index # 120 above Indonesia (130) Venezuela (139), Turkey (151), Russia (148)
Women rights:
2001: Do I really need to elaborate?
2016: 68 seats reserved for women in parliament.
This is war profiteering, and the self perpetuated War on Terror should be the number one major topic in the US Presidential election. The US people should be demanding to know why the WOT has not been successful ? Why is there no end in sight, and why are the killing fields expanding? Why has the greatest and most expensively equipped military in the World been unable to conclude this war? The cost of the war in terms of human lives, and in trillions of dollars is unacceptable.
Gen. Wesley Clark told Amy Goodman that he went to The Pentagon a few weeks after 9/11 in 2001 and in The Joint Chief of Staff’s office he was handed a classified memo by a general that said, “The United States is planning on invading and occupying seven countries in the next five years starting with Afghanistan, then Iraq, Lebanon, Sudan, Somalia, Libya and finishing off with Iran.”:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RC1Mepk_Sw
All of the “Global War on Terror” was obviously planned prior to 9/11.
“The Patriot Act” was written decades prior to 9/11:
Former Counter Terrorism Czar Richard Clarke told Stanford law professor Lawrence Lessig:
“After 9/11 the government drew up the Patriot Act within 20 days and it was passed. The Patriot Act is huge and I remember someone asking a Justice Department official how did they write such a large statute so quickly, and of course the answer was that it has been sitting in the drawers of the Justice Department for the last 20 years waiting for the event where they would pull it out.”
There is another equally large negative aspect which,
like most people, the author does not bring into the
examination.
It is the elephant/jackass in the room.
ALL of the money spent could have been used to improve
huge amounts of infrastructure and positive social programs,
but instead, there has been a shredding of the social fabric
and all of the toxic energy used has escalated the deterioration of the
environment. This shredding and deterioration is global and it
has made a small number of cold-blooded opportunists richer
while it has used violence to distract its economic and
environmental victims who do not (will not?) realize
that they too are the victims of the warmongers economy.
The huge gaping lack which is growing larger with every weapon
produced for private profits will not stop draining away the
lifeblood of global humanity without the worst offenders,
the democrats and republicans,
being rebuked, repudiated, and held in the distrust they deserve.
All of their beloved violence and pollution has a greater cost
(which grows larger every moment) than outlined above.
That cost is to be found in what was not and will not be allowed to develop
while they continue their brutish bloodlust and greed.
Re: infrastructure.
In 2005, my local paper published an article on flood preparedness. The article mentioned that much of the Corps of Engineers funds were being used for projects in Iraq and Afghanistan. It also features the SC Adjutant General (best known for using his office to endorse George W. Bush, in violation of military regulations) saying that Iraq would not effect any response from the national guard. Not too long after, Katrina came. We know how the CoE levees worked then, and how long it took the Guard to respond.
“There is no instance of a nation benefiting from prolonged warfare.”
— Sun Tzu
It is correct that a nation cannot benefit from prolonged war, and in the case of the USA’s fake War on Terror it has cost millions of lives, and bankrupted the nation,However,the elite that own the US Government,the private armies, and the arms corporations have benefited hugely financially.
BINGO
Sun Tzu should be taught in our schools along with Shakespeare.
Shakespeare should be taught in our schools along with Sun Tzu.
Sorry I was out of order. I come from a time when Shakespeare was taught in school. Me and my drinking buddies where well in our cups when some one brought up “what’s your favorite Shakespeare play. We all talked for about an hour, everyone had a play and could give good rationale. Sorry just dated myself and some of my friends.
Hunter S. Thompson, September 12, 2001:
Wow.<3
Walter Oakes in 1944 described the characteristics of the permanent war economy.
The problem prior to 9/11 was that wars were intermittent and each one had to be justified on a case by case basis. This meant long periods when armament companies were forced to accumulate stockpiles and wait for politicians to create the conditions for the next war. After 9/11, a permanent authorization for the use of military force was enacted, thus eliminating such inefficiencies. It should be viewed as tweaking the system for efficiency, rather than a major shift in the character of the economy.
Remember the famous “Peace Dividend”? Neither do I.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace_dividend
Fear and Loathing (Terror and Xenophobia) on the Neocon Trail…
Good job on this piece, Alex.
It’s refreshing to read an article that wants to remind us about the realities that are happening outside of our day-to-day bubbles. This is an important discussion we all should be having on the 15th anniversary of 9.11
war is the foreign policy conjob that will kill America. doom. evil. pandora’s box for real.
Indeed. War and the debt it creates results in the destabilization of governments, as known since Thomas Paine, if not earlier. And it’s just what Osama wanted!
For certain MSM will have extensive coverage on just the opposite. They don’t want to interrupt the illusion of American Exceptionalism. Are you ready for some football???
Happy anniversary ‘Merica!
CIA Director John Brennan
Lock him up
Office of the Inspector General, Central Intelligence Agency
The previous Inspector General of the CIA departed from the
position on January 31, 2015. The President has not yet
nominated a candidate for the Senate’s consideration. The
Committee believes it is critical that the Office of the
Inspector General (OIG) be headed by a Senate-confirmed officer
fully able to exercise the authorities and independence
provided the position in statute.
https://www.cia.gov/offices-of-cia/inspector-general
Is anyone home here?
CIA Director John Brennan
Lock him up.
The relationship between the CIA IG and Congress has been on shaky ground of late. According to press reports, the IG’s office deleted, purportedly by accident, one of just a few electronic copies of a classified Senate report on torture of terror suspects at CIA-run secret sites overseas. In a May 2016 letter, committee vice chair Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) requested that the OIG be furnished with a new electronic copy of the report for its own oversight purposes. OOOPS.
Hey maybe the CIA is just afraid they will be prosecuted for torture but I do not think so.
I think they do not want anyone to start wondering why the only real proof they have of their version of 911 is the confessions of tapioca brained torture sufferers.
I think maybe they needed a fall guy for their own crime.
diane feinstein!? the only oops you get from that zion is a criticism that they arent doing enuf spying and colating on Americans. She sends those items back to her homeland in israel to the IDF and MOSAD. If she does have any objections to persons in the CIA, it would be b/c they arent flying the star of davidstein. She tried to sleep with any and all the execs at the CIA but she has become too ugly inside and the ugly cancer spread thruout her personna and now she scares every potential mate. Since then, she has decided to declare her dictatorship over the UC and threaten people with prison for #BDS support. They dont have freedom of speech or press in israel and she often forgets what country she is in – could be dementia.
Barabbas there you go picking on my Girl
To my American girl.
For you service to the police state.
From your secret admirer, Fred Cowan, Soldier and Scientist, LOL XXX.
Spymaster Queen
She my Spy Master Queen
Finest Lady you ever seen
A lady with a ticket to Halls of Power Ball
A lady who has already humped us all
I want to see her dressed in leathers, jack boots and whip.
Love to bend her head back and spread her lips
Just to give the dark- side a big French-kiss.
Drones in the air and murder plots
All her violence makes me HOT.
Bin’s action plan put it all in motion.
Made police state America an executable notion
Mr. Snowden, don’t dare speak truth to power
Don’t you be so brash,
My girl will polish her jack-boots in your “traitor” ass.
Some say she is paid to not see, a “democracy dissenter.”
It Ok the blowback has made her a “One Percenter (1%)”
Politicians blackmail or bribed, Constitutions in the shedder.
So bust a cap in Bin’s ass so we all can feel better.
Now if I had an “artist” like Ted Nugent to sing it we would have a song as worthy as our governance.
Brilliant.
Great article, Alex!