The White House budget proposal released on Thursday produced harsh, highly critical headlines in local newspapers based in states that President Trump carried in his election in November.
Papers highlighted the cuts to spending on infrastructure, the environment, the impoverished, and arts and culture.
The Columbus Dispatch — based in Ohio where Trump won 51.3 percent of the vote — ran a front page story on Friday titled “Unkind Cuts to Ohio?” The story noted that the budget eliminated funding for the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, “a $300 million undertaking to clean up and keep invasive species from the world’s largest single source of fresh surface water,” which “directly benefits the same upper industrial Midwestern states — Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin — that elevated Trump to the presidency in November.”
“Trump’s budget slams West Virginia,” was splashed across the front page of the Charleston Gazette-Mail on Friday. The paper noted the cuts to education spending and the Appalachian Regional Commission, which supports infrastructure in the state. The state gave Trump 68.7 percent of the vote.
In Florida, where Trump won with 48.6 percent of the vote, the Orlando Sentinel warned that the White House budget would “slash research, EPA, DOT, job training, libraries.”
The Press Register, based in Mobile, Alabama — a coastal city where Trump held one of his first mega rallies, and a state that he won with 62.9 percent of the vote — used its front page Friday to warn that “Trump cuts bite into coast.” It noted that the White House budget “seeks deep cuts to agencies and organizations with a long-standing presence in Coastal Alabama,” such as the Mobile Bay Estuary Program, which monitors water quality and protects wildlife along the coast.
Allentown, Pennsylvania-based paper The Morning Call — in a state Trump won with 48.2 percent of the vote — ran a front page article with the headline “Cuts are a ‘huge blow’ to Valley social services, arts.” The paper directly contrasted the president’s request for a large increase in military spending with proposed cuts to domestic programs. “To cover a $54 billion boost in defense spending next year, President Donald Trump has proposed cuts that would hit Lehigh Valley cities and social services, including programs that aid children after school, homeless people in shelters and neighborhoods dealing with crime,” it noted.
In Iowa (site of a 51.2 percent victory for Trump), Cedar Rapids-based The Gazette also highlighted the transfer from domestic programs to the military:
In Michigan, where Trump scored a slim 47.3 percent victory, the Detroit Free Press highlighted the same tradeoff — noting both the increase in military spending and the cuts to the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, which funds pollution cleanup in the state.
Top photo: A portion of President Donald Trump’s first proposed budget, focusing on the Department of State, USAID, and Treasury International Programs, and released by the Office of Management and Budget, is photographed in Washington, on Wednesday, March 15, 2017.
IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT.
What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government.
This is not hyperbole.
Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.
Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.”
The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy.
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
I’M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
Latest Stories
Hegseth Brags of a Deadlier War Machine as U.S. Unleashes “Devastating Civilian Harm Globally”
While testifying to Congress on Wednesday, War Secretary Pete Hegseth lobbed threats and brushed off queries about civilian harm.
Mike Johnson Used Crypto Catnip to Get Freedom Caucus Support for Domestic Spy Law
A provision unrelated to domestic spying got the hard-right GOP members on board — but it won’t work in the Senate.
Midterms 2026
ICE Watchers Worry Democrats Are Trying to Co-Opt Their Movements For Votes
Minneapolis activists are accusing a local House candidate of “cosplaying” as a protester, blurring the line between solidarity and opportunism.