Venezuela and its president, Nicolás Maduro, have proved to be favorite targets of the Trump administration’s ire. At the outset of a summit on Central America in Miami last week — on the sidelines of which the administration announced its retrograde Cuba policy — President Donald Trump told Secretary of State Rex Tillerson to “collaborate with countries in the region to move discussions on Venezuela forward,” according to a White House statement. “The United States stands with the people of Venezuela during these sad and troubling times for their country.”
Miami, however, was where Tillerson’s personal diplomatic entreaties were to end. The day after the White House statement, Tillerson cancelled his attendance at the Organization of American States’ 47th General Assembly, which is convening in Cancun, Mexico, on Monday, with Venezuela high on the agenda. Instead of participating directly, Tillerson will remain in Washington to address rising tensions in the Persian Gulf.
The change of plans reflects the State Department’s priorities, but also spares Tillerson a direct confrontation with his complicated history in Venezuela.
The general assembly comes as Venezuela is plagued by staggering inflation, food shortages, decrepit medical infrastructure, and violent political unrest. Those dynamics are being compounded by another diplomatic crisis: In April, Maduro’s Foreign Minister Delcy Rodríguez announced that Venezuela will be withdrawing from the OAS after 65 years, viewing the hemisphere’s premier diplomatic venue as an arm of a campaign in pursuit of regime change.
Venezuela’s crises are all the more vexing because, even as people starve today, it was once the wealthiest country in Latin America — Venezuela boasts the world’s largest proven oil reserves.
Enter the former ExxonMobil executive Rex Tillerson. While Tillerson headed the oil giant, a position he stepped down from to join the Trump administration, ExxonMobil took a significant blow from Maduro’s predecessor, Hugo Chàvez. In 2007, Chàvez nationalized the oil company’s Venezuelan assets, valued at $10 billion. ExxonMobil again faced off with Maduro in 2015, over drilling in disputed waters off the coast of Guyana. In that case, Tillerson prevailed.
Despite Tillerson’s fraught history with Venezuela, the country initially seemed willing to play ball with the Trump administration. A Venezuelan state-owned oil company donated $500,000 to Trump’s inauguration and, in February, businessmen with ties to Trump met with members of the National Security Council, including top White House adviser Steve Bannon, to discuss lifting sanctions on Venezuela. Maduro, for his part, took a softer line on Trump than one might expect from an anti-imperialist firebrand. “He won’t be worse than Obama,” the Venezuelan leader said as Trump was coming to power, comparing the new American president to his predecessor, Barack Obama.
The outreach, however, soon turned sour. As the current wave of violent antigovernment protests against Maduro grew in recent months, Trump began to speak of intervention and new sanctions. In mid-May, he announced sanctions against eight members of Venezuela’s Supreme Court after it found members of the Venezuelan opposition party in contempt and removed them from power. Maduro described the sanctions as an attempted coup, condemning Trump and commanding him, “Get your pig hands out of here!”
Yet the hands-on work of international wrangling in Cancun to confront Venezuela’s interwoven crises won’t be carried out by Trump’s top diplomat. Instead, it will fall to Tillerson’s Deputy Secretary of State John Sullivan, a longtime Republican bureaucrat with little experience in diplomacy, let alone on Venezuela.
Top photo: Secretary of State Rex Tillerson attends the Conference on Prosperity and Security in Central America at the Florida International University on June 15, 2017 in Miami, Florida.
IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT.
What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government.
This is not hyperbole.
Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.
Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.”
The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy.
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
I’M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
Latest Stories
The Intercept Briefing
“Me Too” Comes Back To Congress
Intercept staffers discuss the themes emerging this midterm election season.
Voices
Kash Patel Is Using MAGA’s Favorite Tool to Muzzle the Free Press
By suing The Atlantic for defamation, the FBI director is leveraging one of Trump’s legal tactics to tamp down free speech.
License to Kill
Trump Has Already Spent at Least $4.7 Billion Attacking Latin America
It’s not cheap to attack Venezuela and capture its president or conduct dozens of strikes on civilian boats.