Skip to main content

John Podesta Was Warned in 2008 to Start Encrypting Sensitive Emails

Denis McDonough, now White House chief of staff, wrote in 2008 that he was surprised to see "a sensitive doc bumping around on public email addresses."

White House counselor John Podesta, left, walks with Chief of Staff Denis McDonough along the West Wing colonnade at the White House in Washington, Friday, Feb. 14, 2014, as they will accompany President Barack Obama to the Democratic House members retreat in Cambridge, Md. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)
White House counselor John Podesta, left, walks with Chief of Staff Denis McDonough along the West Wing colonnade at the White House in Washington, Friday, Feb. 14, 2014, as they will accompany President Barack Obama to the Democratic House members retreat in Cambridge, Md. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak) Photo: Charles Dharapak/AP

John Podesta, the Clinton campaign chairman whose hacked emails have exposed countless Democratic secrets to the world, was warned in 2008 to start protecting sensitive documents “by at least encrypting them.”

The warning came in an unencrypted email chain forwarded by Denis McDonough, then a top Obama campaign aide and currently the White House chief of staff, to Podesta, who at the time was running Obama’s transition team.

McDonough initially sent the warning to Obama economic adviser Daniel Tarullo in an email on November 3, 2008, the day before President Obama’s election victory, presumably in response to a detailed November 2 memo Tarullo sent around about the upcoming G-20 meeting President Bush had called to discuss the ongoing financial crisis.

McDonough wrote:

I was struck by the memo partly because it was first I had heard of it but much more because it was a sensitive doc bumping around on public email addresses.

There is a very real threat to the security of our documents (particularly sensitive ones like the one you worked up), and we need to protect them by at least encrypting them.

Tarullo emailed back:

I had never heard anything like this from either the campaign or the pre-transition effort and, in fact, have been receiving things of equal or greater sensitivity for some time from both sources. You guys are presumably much more likely to be made aware of such issues, so when the economic side of the transition gets named, you should probably get in touch with them to give guidance on this.

McDonough then forwarded the thread to Podesta, with the following comment:

Hey, John,

I know I’m like a broken record on this, but I think we should arrange a briefing on the cyber threat for all associated with your effort.

We have a real security threat on our stuff here. I would gladly work up something with our techie. We’ve developed a lot of expertise in this, unfortunately.

The email, ironically enough, showed up in Thursday morning’s release of the latest batch of Podesta’s emails being published daily by WikiLeaks. Their source is unclear; U.S. intelligence officials say they have evidence they were hacked by people working under Russian government supervision, but they have not made that evidence public.

The emails have spawned countless news articles, about Clinton’s private speeches to megabanks like Goldman Sachs, her campaign team’s coordination with Super PACs, internal squabbles about Clinton’s use of a private email server, how the Clinton Foundation enriched the Clintons, and many other subjects.

The earliest email from McDonough to Podesta about security seems to have come on October 12, 2008, when McDonough noted to Podesta, who was already well along in planning the transition: “we gotta figure our security. Our tech guy is in wdc tomorro.”

The fact that foreign actors were actively trying to hack U.S. presidential campaigns as well as the U.S. government was hardly a closely-held secret. As The Intercept reported in May, incoming members of the Obama administration were explicitly warned by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence that “foreign intelligence services have been tracking this election cycle like no other.”

McDonough himself is the sender and recipient of numerous nonencrypted emails in the trove, including many discussing personnel choices for top security and intelligence jobs.

Podesta, of course, continued to email in the clear at least through March 2016, when he was hacked, even when his communications included sensitive and embarrassing communications and passwords. We recently offered him some security tips.

Top photo: Then-White House counselor John Podesta (left) with Chief of Staff Denis McDonough in 2014.

IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT.

What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government. 

This is not hyperbole.

Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.

Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.” 

The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy.

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.

We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.

In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.

That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

I’M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.

We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.

In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.

That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

Latest Stories

Join The Conversation