Skip to main content

Israel Attempts to Smear Razan al-Najjar, Palestinian Medic It Killed, Calling Her “No Angel”

Israel's army released a deceptively edited video, hoping to tarnish the image of Razan al-Najjar, a Palestinian paramedic killed by Israeli fire in Gaza.

Palestinian protesters evacuate a female medic of Razan Najjar, 21, youth near the Gaza Strip's border with Israel, during a protest east of Khan Younis, Gaza Strip, Friday, June 1, 2018. Najjar, was shot in the chest and died later at hospital, the Health Ministry said. (AP Photo/Adel Hana)
Palestinian protesters evacuate a female medic of Razan Najjar, 21, youth near the Gaza Strip's border with Israel, during a protest east of Khan Younis, Gaza Strip, Friday, June 1, 2018. Najjar, was shot in the chest and died later at hospital, the Health Ministry said. (AP Photo/Adel Hana) Photo: Adel Hana/AP

Israel’s army released a deceptively edited video on Thursday, hoping to tarnish the image of Razan al-Najjar, a Palestinian paramedic killed by Israeli fire in Gaza last week.

According to witness testimony, al-Najjar, who was 21, was gunned down last Friday after she and other medics, walking with their hands up and wearing white vests, approached the perimeter that confines Palestinians to Gaza in order to treat a wounded protester.

TOPSHOT - Palestinian paramedics approach the barbed wire fence with Israel to tend to injured protesters during clashes along the border east of Khan Yunis in the southern Gaza strip on June 1, 2018. (Photo by Said KHATIB / AFP)        (Photo credit should read SAID KHATIB/AFP/Getty Images)

Palestinian paramedics approached Israel’s perimeter fence around Gaza to tend to injured protesters, east of Khan Yunis in the southern Gaza Strip on June 1, 2018.

Photo: Said Khatib/AFP/Getty Images

Video released by the health ministry in Gaza, said to show al-Najjar and the others just before the Israelis opened fire, seemed to confirm that their hands were in the air as they advanced.

The fatal shooting of the young woman, who had spoken eloquently about her lifesaving role to a New York Times video journalist and on Lebanese television, has been a public relations disaster for Israel.

Killing al-Najjar, who clearly posed no threat to its soldiers, made it difficult for Israel’s army to argue that its snipers targeted only “rioters” in Gaza and did not fire indiscriminately at peaceful protesters, journalists, and medics.

In response to an international outcry over her death, the Israel Defense Forces said earlier this week that al-Najjar had been killed accidentally by a soldier aiming at someone else. Then, on Thursday, the army’s social media unit began a coordinated smear campaign against her, by falsely suggesting in a video that she had been engaged in rioting and had attended the protests to shield militants disguised as protesters.

As evidence of “rioting,” the military offered just 10 seconds of video, underpinned by music suitable for a horror movie, which showed a woman who was dressed like al-Najjar tossing away a tear gas canister fired at protesters by Israeli forces. If the woman was al-Najjar, the video only showed her participating in a ritual familiar to protesters around the world — tossing tear gas fired at them as far away as possible. The video also shows that she hurled the canister only a short distance, and it landed nowhere near any Israeli soldiers.

The second part of the video that supposedly excuses the killing of al-Najjar is half a sentence clipped from an interview she gave to the Lebanese broadcaster Al Mayadeen News, in which she had called her role as a protest medic being “a human shield to protect and save the injured on the front lines.” An Israeli military editor cut that sentence in half to make it seems as if al-Najjar had been caught admitting that she was only present to provide cover to militants.

Despite these obvious shortcomings, a version of the video was shared by Ofir Gendelman, a spokesperson for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who, as an Arabic speaker, must have been aware that the medic’s comments had been taken out of context.

Joe Dyke of Agence France-Presse reported that Gendelman “denied that the editing of the video to remove the full context about serving injured people could be seen as political manipulation.” If al-Najjar acted as a human shield, Gendelman told AFP, that meant that she was “not a medic.”

The video was also shared by Netanyahu’s former spokesperson, Mark Regev, who is now Israel’s ambassador to Britain; Israel’s foreign ministry; and Maj. Avichay Adraee, an Arabic language spokesperson for the Israeli military, who claimed on Twitter that the video somehow proved that al-Najjar was “no angel.”

The smear campaign outraged Palestinian and Israeli observers who oppose Israel’s ongoing occupation and lying.

Michael Omer-Man, the editor-in-chief of Israel’s +972 Magazine, noted that Israel’s military has a track record when it comes to releasing heavily edited videos of questionable ethics.

In 2010, the Israeli army also released what appeared to be fake audio, intended to discredit the Turkish-led Gaza flotilla, of an activist supposedly saying to an Israeli officer over the radio, “Shut up, go back to Auschwitz,” and, “We’re helping Arabs go against the U.S. Don’t forget 9/11, guys.”

While such videos have failed to convince critics of Israel’s military, an Israeli public which overwhelmingly supports the use of force in Gaza might be more easily swayed. (A recent poll found that 62 percent of Jewish Israelis think their military has used the right amount of force in response to the protests in Gaza, where more than 3,500 Palestinian protesters have been shot and at least 120 have been killed. Another 28 percent of the Jewish Israeli public says the army has used too little force.)

“The IDF spokesperson published an edited video, comprised of clips that have no connection to each other nor to the day al-Najjar was killed, to justify the killing of the young paramedic, to prove that she was not simply an innocent nurse, and to present her as a terrorist or a potential terrorist,” Yael Marom observed in +972 Magazine.

“The video says: It was okay to kill her, she was an Arab,” he added. “And Israel’s mainstream outlets, to prove their patriotism and to boost their ratings, completely bought the IDF’s spin. They published the clip without questions or clarifications or warnings that it was not in any verified, and that it in no way justifies her killing. A broadcaster on one of Israel’s most-watched channels even said, without any proof of this in the video, that al-Najjar threw the tear gas canister ‘during a violent protest.'”

IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT.

What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government. 

This is not hyperbole.

Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.

Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.” 

The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy.

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.

We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.

In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.

That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

I’M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.

We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.

In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.

That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

Latest Stories

Join The Conversation