The third and final presidential debate was what we have come to expect in head-to-head confrontations between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump: 90 minutes full of vicious insults, dark accusations of sexual misconduct and allegiance to foreign powers, and attempts by both candidates to steer policy questions back to mudslinging.
While this debate showcased a slightly more subdued Trump for the first 30 minutes, the reality television star then pivoted back to his freewheeling, abrasive style. He repeatedly interrupted Clinton, calling her a liar and a “nasty woman,” and managed to top even himself with the shocking suggestion that he may not accept the election results if he loses. “I will keep you in suspense, okay?”
No, not okay.
Clinton used the beginning of the debate to channel some core progressive values, declaring during the first question about Supreme Court justices that her choice would uphold rights for marginalized groups and take aim at the Citizens United decision. Then, while she made passing references to expanding the social safety net and adopting Bernie Sanders’s ideas on higher education, she also emphasized her dedication to reducing the national debt. And later still, she tacked right, reiterating her support for a no-fly zone in Syria, a policy that would by definition entail potentially shooting down Syrian and Russian warplanes and sparking a dangerous escalation of the war.
By most accounts, Fox News’s Chris Wallace kept the debate grounded, deftly steering from one topic to the next, and he at times pushed back on obvious falsehoods repeated by Trump, including his refusal to acknowledge that his foundation had used charity funds to settle Trump’s legal bills.
But his questions were from a reliably right-of-center perspective. He demanded answers on reducing the national debt and the importance of keeping U.S. troops in Iraq “to make sure that ISIS does not come back or is even replaced by something even worse?” Out of all the Wikileaks revelations, Wallace avoided pertinent questions about financial regulations or fracking, and instead focused on the disclosure of a paid speech in which Clinton hoped for open borders within the hemisphere.
Economist Justin Wolfer aptly observed: “Wallace did a good job managing this debate, but many of his questions (to both) have been: Why aren’t you promising Republican orthodoxy?”
The Intercept’s team covered the debate on our liveblog, and we couldn’t help thinking about the much bigger topics that could have been tackled, including climate change and racial justice.
The debate was largely a parade of opposition research and put-downs, with little in-depth discussion of the problems the country faces.
But it did have its moments of unintended comic relief, as when Trump seemed to confuse a c-section procedure with an abortion, described his meeting with “high Indian representatives,” and tried to talk about military strategy.
See below for what we posted, categorized by topic. Did the debate go as you expected? What did we miss? Tell us in the comments.
Confidence in the election
- Trump blithely craps on America’s most important tradition
- Trump promise to keep Americans “in suspense” over accepting results stuns viewers
Foreign policy
- Donald Trump claims Iraq is trying to retake Mosul from ISIS just to help Hillary Clinton
- Donald Trump’s “high representatives of India” are Bollywood stars and some Indian-Americans
Wikileaks
- Wikileaks emails were stolen, but Clinton should still have to answer for them
- Trump says the U.S. doesn’t know who hacked Democrats, contradicting U.S. intelligence
Ethics
- The Clinton Foundation’s work in Haiti is a scandal, not just a talking point
- Donald Trump now accepts Saudi Arabia’s lobby cash
Debate questions
- This conservative special interest group has been cited four times during the debates
- Chris Wallace bungles sexual assault question
- Every presidential debate has ignored in-depth discussions of racial justice
- Trump’s crazy idea for pre-debate drug testing came from the alt-right
- Russia or Putin have been mentioned 45 times more than climate change in the debates so far
- Chris Wallace propaganda aims at cutting Social Security and Medicare
- As world cooks, no questions scheduled on global warming
Justice
- What Obama’s record deportations look like
- Donald Trump’s picks for SCOTUS look to Scalia legacy
- GOP megadonor Adelson has provided 95% of the funds for Nevada’s anti-pot campaign
Reproductive rights
- Trump says woman’s right to choose will be overturned “automatically”
- Trump mistakes C-section for abortion
Top photo: Republican nominee Donald Trump looks on as Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton speaks during the final presidential debate at the Thomas and Mack Center on the campus of the University of Las Vegas in Nevada.
IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT.
What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government.
This is not hyperbole.
Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.
Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.”
The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy.
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
I’M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
Latest Stories
Chilling Dissent
The Short and Ridiculous Trial of a Protester Arrested in an Inflatable Penis Costume
An Alabama cop who confronted the No Kings protester claimed she posed a risk to public safety. The judge was unconvinced.
Targeting Iran
Pentagon Erases Wounded U.S. Troops From Iran War Casualty List: “Definition of a Cover-up”
The U.S. government altered its tally of American casualties — inexplicably scrubbing 15 wounded-in-action troops from the count.
U.S. Personnel Who Died in Mexico Were Working for the CIA, Sources Say
Two Americans killed in Mexico, previously identified only as “staff from the United States Embassy,” participated in a raid on a drug lab.